Shin Young In, Lee Jaekyoung, Jeong Yoon, Huh Min Gu, Park Ki Ho, Jeoung Jin Wook
Department of Ophthalmology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 1;142(10):943-950. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.3323.
Although optic disc hemorrhage (DH) is widely recognized as a glaucoma risk factor, its clinical relevance in relation to proximity has not been investigated.
To determine the association of the proximal location of DH with glaucoma progression.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this longitudinal observational cohort study, 146 eyes of 146 patients at Seoul National University Hospital who had had 1 or more DH with at least 5 years of follow-up and had at least 5 reliable visual field examinations were included. These data were analyzed January 10, 2010, through June 27, 2017.
Laminar, marginal, rim, and parapapillary subtypes of DH were identified based on their respective proximal locations. The laminar and marginal subtypes were classified into the cup-type group, while the rim and parapapillary subtypes were classified into the peripapillary-type group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare survival experiences and multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazard model to identify risk factors for glaucoma progression. Regression analyses, both univariate and multivariate, were used to discover significant indicators of mean deviation (MD) loss.
The primary outcome was glaucoma progression. Glaucoma progression was defined either as structural or functional deterioration.
For all of the eyes, the mean follow-up period was 10.9 (3.7) years (range, 5.1-17.8 years), the mean age at which DH was first detected was 55.1 (11.3) years (range, 21-77 years), and 94 participants were female (64.1%). Over the mean follow-up period of 10.9 years, glaucoma progression was detected in 94 eyes (61.4%) with an MD change of -0.48 dB per year. The cup-type group showed a faster rate of MD change relative to the peripapillary-type group (-0.56 vs -0.32 dB per year; difference = -0.24; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.11; P = .01). The cup group showed a higher cumulative probability of progression of glaucoma (80.4%) relative to the peripapillary group (54.4%; difference = 26.0%; 95% CI, 11.4%-40.6%; P < .001) in a life table analysis. The presence of cup hemorrhage was associated with an increased risk of glaucoma progression (hazard ratio, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.12-5.07; P < .001) in the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Cup-type DH was associated to MD loss rate in regression analysis.
This study showed glaucoma progression was higher in cases of DH classified as the cup type. These findings support the potential utility of assessing the proximal location of DH to predict how glaucoma might progress.
尽管视盘出血(DH)被广泛认为是青光眼的一个危险因素,但其与临近区域相关的临床意义尚未得到研究。
确定DH的近端位置与青光眼进展之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:在这项纵向观察性队列研究中,纳入了首尔国立大学医院146例患者的146只眼睛,这些患者有1次或更多次DH,至少随访5年且至少有5次可靠的视野检查。对这些数据的分析时间为2010年1月10日至2017年6月27日。
根据DH各自的近端位置确定其板层、边缘、视盘边缘和视乳头旁亚型。板层和边缘亚型被归类为杯状组,而视盘边缘和视乳头旁亚型被归类为视乳头周围组。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析比较生存经验,并使用Cox比例风险模型进行多变量分析以确定青光眼进展的危险因素。采用单变量和多变量回归分析来发现平均偏差(MD)损失的显著指标。
主要结局是青光眼进展。青光眼进展定义为结构或功能恶化。
所有眼睛的平均随访期为10.9(3.7)年(范围范围为5.1 - 17.8年),首次检测到DH时的平均年龄为55.1(11.3)岁(范围为21 - 77岁),94名参与者为女性(64.1%)。在平均10.9年的随访期内,94只眼睛(61.4%)检测到青光眼进展,MD每年变化-0.48 dB。杯状组相对于视乳头周围组的MD变化率更快(每年-0.56 dB对-0.32 dB;差异=-0.24;95%CI,-0.37至-0.11;P = 0.01)。在生存表分析中,杯状组相对于视乳头周围组的青光眼进展累积概率更高(80.4%对54.4%;差异=26.0%;95%CI,11.4% - 40.6%;P < 0.001)。在多变量Cox比例风险模型中,杯状出血的存在与青光眼进展风险增加相关(风险比,3.28;95%CI,2.12 - 5.07;P < 0.001)。在回归分析中,杯状型DH与MD损失率相关。
本研究表明,归类为杯状型的DH病例中青光眼进展更高。这些发现支持评估DH近端位置以预测青光眼可能如何进展的潜在效用。