• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版第二部分人格障碍和第三部分人格领域与精神科患者样本临床功能障碍的关联。

A comparison of the associations of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, Section II personality disorders and Section III personality domains with clinical dysfunction in a psychiatric patient sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):322-331. doi: 10.1037/per0000687.

DOI:10.1037/per0000687
PMID:39235916
Abstract

In this study, we compare the incremental predictive capacities of the , Section II personality disorders (SII-PDs) with Section III trait domains of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) in a psychiatric outpatient sample ( = 185). To this end, a series of hierarchical regression analyses was conducted in which the 10 SII-PDs and the five AMPD trait domains served as the predictor variables and five areas of clinical dysfunction as the criterion variables. Two models for each criterion were tested. In Model A, the 10 PDs were entered as a block, followed by the block entry of trait domains; in Model B, the block entry of these predictors was reversed. As the AMPD was designed to address the shortcomings of the SII-PDs, it was hypothesized that the AMPD trait domains would show greater predictive capacity vis-à-vis the latter by (a) explaining more overall variance for each criterion variables when entered first into the model versus when SII-PDs was entered first and (b) explaining more incremental variance than SII-PDs when block was entered second. These hypotheses were partially supported. Overall, the AMPD trait domains predicted more variance than SII-PDs and demonstrated better model fit and more predictive power for three of the criterion variables. Similarly, the AMPD domains predicted a significant but modest incremental increase in variance over that of the SII-PDs for three of the criterion variables. We conclude that more work needs to be done to improve the AMPD, particularly in the assessment of externalizing psychopathology as it relates to clinical dysfunction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

在这项研究中,我们比较了精神病门诊患者样本(n=185)中人格障碍第二部分(SII-PD)的增量预测能力与替代人格障碍模型(AMPD)第三部分特质领域。为此,我们进行了一系列层次回归分析,其中 SII-PD 的 10 种和 AMPD 的 5 种特质领域作为预测变量,5 个临床功能障碍领域作为标准变量。每个标准变量都测试了两种模型。在模型 A 中,首先输入 10 个 PD,然后输入特质领域;在模型 B 中,这些预测器的块输入顺序相反。由于 AMPD 旨在解决 SII-PD 的缺点,因此我们假设,与 SII-PD 相比,AMPD 特质领域将通过以下方式表现出更大的预测能力:(a)当首先输入模型时,与 SII-PD 相比,对每个标准变量的总体方差解释更多;(b)当块输入第二时,比 SII-PD 解释更多的增量方差。这些假设得到了部分支持。总体而言,AMPD 特质领域比 SII-PD 预测更多的方差,并且对三个标准变量的模型拟合度更好,预测能力更强。同样,AMPD 领域对三个标准变量的方差预测比 SII-PD 有显著但适度的增量增加。我们得出结论,需要做更多的工作来改进 AMPD,特别是在评估与临床功能障碍相关的外化精神病理学方面。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the associations of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, Section II personality disorders and Section III personality domains with clinical dysfunction in a psychiatric patient sample.比较《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版第二部分人格障碍和第三部分人格领域与精神科患者样本临床功能障碍的关联。
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):322-331. doi: 10.1037/per0000687.
2
Longitudinal prediction of psychosocial functioning outcomes: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Section-II personality disorders versus alternative model personality dysfunction and traits.纵向预测心理社会功能结局:《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版,第二部分人格障碍与替代模型人格功能障碍和特质。
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):341-351. doi: 10.1037/per0000673. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
3
Comparing the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, personality disorder models scored from the same interview.比较《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版,从相同的访谈中对人格障碍模型进行评分。
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):371-378. doi: 10.1037/per0000663. Epub 2024 May 9.
4
The Incremental Utility of Criteria A and B of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders for Predicting DSM-IV/DSM-5 Section II Personality Disorders.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5)人格障碍替代模型的A标准和B标准在预测DSM-IV/DSM-5第二部分人格障碍方面的增量效用
J Pers Assess. 2023 Jan-Feb;105(1):111-120. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2022.2039166. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
5
Comparing the DSM-5 categorical model of personality disorders and the alternative model of personality disorders regarding clinician judgments of risk and outcome.比较 DSM-5 人格障碍分类模型与人格障碍替代模型在临床医生风险和结果判断方面的差异。
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):315-321. doi: 10.1037/per0000657. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
6
An evaluation of DSM-5 Section III personality disorder Criterion A (impairment) in accounting for psychopathology.DSM-5 第三部分人格障碍标准 A(损害)在解释精神病理学方面的评估。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Oct;31(10):1181-1191. doi: 10.1037/pas0000620.
7
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, personality disorders and the alternative model: Prediction of naturalistically observed behavior, interpersonal functioning, and psychiatric symptoms, 1 year later.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版、人格障碍与替代模型:对一年后自然观察到的行为、人际功能和精神症状的预测
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):361-370. doi: 10.1037/per0000677. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
8
Predicting nonsuicidal self-injury and suicidal risk: A comparison between the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition Section II personality disorder and alternative model of personality disorders dimensions.预测非自杀性自伤和自杀风险:《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版第二部分人格障碍与人格障碍维度替代模型的比较。
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):282-292. doi: 10.1037/per0000658. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
9
Head-to-head comparisons of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, Section II and Section III personality disorder in predicting clinical outcomes.第五版《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第二、三部分人格障碍诊断在预测临床结局方面的头对头比较。
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):275-281. doi: 10.1037/per0000691.
10
Different routes to the same destination? Comparing Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition Section II- and alternative model of personality disorder-defined borderline personality disorder.殊途同归?比较《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版第二编与替代性人格障碍定义的边缘型人格障碍。
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):352-360. doi: 10.1037/per0000676. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The validity, reliability and clinical utility of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) according to DSM-5 revision criteria.根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版修订标准,人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的有效性、可靠性和临床实用性。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Oct;24(3):319-340. doi: 10.1002/wps.21339.