Zaniewski Elizabeth, Skrivankova Veronika Whitesell, Brazier Ellen, Avihingsanon Anchalee, Wagner Cardoso Sandra, Cesar Carina, Chenal Henri, Crabtree-Ramírez Brenda E, Ditangco Rossana A, Ebasone Peter Vanes, Eley Brian, Euvrard Jonathan George, Fatti Geoffrey, Huwa Jacqueline Madalitso, Lelo Patricia, Machado Daisy Maria, Messou Eugene Kouassi, Minga Albert Kla, Muleebwa Joseph, Mundhe Sanjay, Murenzi Gad, Muyindike Winnie R, Nsonde Dominique Mahambou, Obatsa Sarah M, Odhiambo Joseph, Prozesky Hans Walter, Rungmaitree Supattra, Semeere Aggrey Semwendero, Seydi Moussa, Sipambo Nosisa, Sudjaritruk Tavitiya, Technau Karl-Günter, Tiendrebeogo Thierry, Twizere Christelle, Ballif Marie
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.
City University of New York, Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, New York, USA.
AIDS. 2024 Dec 1;38(15):2073-2085. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004007. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
We studied the transition to dolutegravir-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) at HIV treatment clinics within the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA).
Site-level survey conducted in 2020-2021 among HIV clinics in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
We assessed the status of dolutegravir rollout and viral load and drug resistance testing practices for persons on ART switching to dolutegravir-based regimens. We used generalized estimating equations to assess associations between clinic rollout of both first- and second-line dolutegravir-based ART regimens (dual rollout) and site-level factors.
Of 179 surveyed clinics, 175 (98%) participated; 137 (78%) from Africa, 30 (17%) from the Asia-Pacific, and 8 (5%) from Latin America. Most clinics (80%) were in low- or lower-middle-income countries, and there were a mix of primary-, secondary- and tertiary-level clinics. Ninety percent reported rollout of first-line dolutegravir, 59% of second-line, 94% of first- or second-line and 55% of dual rollout. The adjusted odds of dual rollout were higher among tertiary-level [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.00; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39-11.47] and secondary-level clinics (aOR 3.66; 95% CI 2.19-6.11) than in primary-level clinics. Over half (59%) of clinics that introduced first- or second-line dolutegravir-based ART required recent viral load testing before switching to dolutegravir, and 15% performed genotypic resistance testing at switch.
Dolutegravir-based ART was rolled out at nearly all IeDEA clinics in LMICs, yet many switched persons to dolutegravir without recent viral load testing and drug resistance testing was rarely performed. Without such testing, drug resistance among persons switching to dolutegravir may go undetected.
我们在国际艾滋病流行病学数据库(IeDEA)中的艾滋病治疗诊所研究了向含多替拉韦的抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的转换情况。
2020年至2021年期间在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的艾滋病诊所进行的机构层面调查。
我们评估了多替拉韦的推广情况以及转用基于多替拉韦方案的接受抗逆转录病毒治疗者的病毒载量和耐药性检测情况。我们使用广义估计方程来评估一线和二线基于多替拉韦的抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的诊所推广(双重推广)与机构层面因素之间的关联。
在179家接受调查的诊所中,175家(98%)参与;137家(78%)来自非洲,30家(17%)来自亚太地区,8家(5%)来自拉丁美洲。大多数诊所(80%)位于低收入或中低收入国家,且有初级、二级和三级诊所的混合。90%的诊所报告了一线多替拉韦的推广情况,二线为59%,一线或二线为94%,双重推广为55%。三级诊所(调整优势比[aOR] 4.00;95%置信区间[CI] 1.39 - 11.47)和二级诊所(aOR 3.66;95% CI 2.19 - 6.11)双重推广的调整优势比高于初级诊所。引入一线或二线基于多替拉韦的抗逆转录病毒治疗的诊所中,超过一半(59%)要求在转用多替拉韦之前进行近期病毒载量检测,15%在转换时进行基因型耐药性检测。
在低收入和中等收入国家的几乎所有IeDEA诊所都推广了基于多替拉韦的抗逆转录病毒治疗,但许多转用多替拉韦的患者没有进行近期病毒载量检测,耐药性检测也很少进行。没有此类检测,转用多替拉韦的患者中的耐药情况可能无法被发现。