Suppr超能文献

rG. 亲子鉴定中的潜在陷阱。

rG. Potential pitfall in parentage testing.

作者信息

Schornack J L, Beattie K M

出版信息

Transfusion. 1985 May-Jun;25(3):270-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1985.25385219913.x.

Abstract

Extensive studies were done on the family of an infant investigated for possible hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN). Fourteen members in four generations were shown to carry the rG gene with r, R1 or R2. If testing had not included anti-CD(G) serum, three false exclusions of paternity and four of maternity might have resulted in this large Caucasian family. The findings also demonstrated that titration of Rh antisera against the red cells of family members could not be relied upon to assess zygosity or dosage.

摘要

对一名因可能患有新生儿溶血病(HDN)而接受调查的婴儿的家族进行了广泛研究。四代中的14名成员被证明携带rG基因,其等位基因有r、R1或R2。在这个庞大的白种人家庭中,如果检测不包括抗CD(G)血清,可能会导致3例假父系排除和4例假母系排除。研究结果还表明,依靠用Rh抗血清滴定家族成员的红细胞来评估合子性或剂量是不可靠的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验