Suppr超能文献

对儿科住院医师临床能力委员会前瞻性委托决策的现实主义评估。

A realist evaluation of prospective entrustment decisions in paediatric residency clinical competency committees.

作者信息

Schumacher Daniel J, Martini Abigail, Michelson Catherine, Turner David A, Winn Ariel S, Kinnear Benjamin

机构信息

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2025 Mar;59(3):292-301. doi: 10.1111/medu.15530. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Making entrustment decisions (granting more responsibility, advancement and graduation) are important actions in medical training that pose risks to trainees and patients if not done well. A previous realist synthesis of the existing literature revealed that clinical competency committees (CCCs) do not typically make deliberate entrustment decisions, instead defaulting to the promotion and graduation of trainees in the absence of red flags. This study sought further understanding of these areas through empirical data.

METHODS

The authors conducted a realist inquiry to better understand how CCC prospective entrustment decision-making is carried out in paediatric residency programs. They conducted four CCC meeting observations and 18 interviews with CCC members at eight sites in an effort to confirm, disconfirm, and elaborate an existing theory that was based on a literature synthesis.

RESULTS

The literature-based theory held up well against the empiric data collected in this study. Therefore, the authors did not modify that theory and instead developed three new demi-regularities (recurring patterns in data when conducting realist work) that add detail and nuance to their previous understanding of this model. These new demi-regularities focus on (i) expounding on how deliberate actions of CCCs focus more on resident development than on resident entrustment; (ii) elucidating that effortful work is not only about reconciling a paucity of data or incongruent data but also working hard to 'do the right thing' for residents; and (iii) describing how programs consider bias, equity and fairness, with a wide range of intentionality from being reactive to being proactive.

CONCLUSION

This study offers evidence of deliberate CCC efforts to support resident development. Moving forward, a similar focus should be more consistently placed on equitable entrustment and advancement decisions to balance both of these foundational goals.

摘要

目的

做出委托决策(赋予更多责任、晋升和结业)是医学培训中的重要行为,如果做得不好,会给学员和患者带来风险。先前对现有文献的实证主义综合研究表明,临床能力委员会(CCC)通常不会做出深思熟虑的委托决策,而是在没有警示信号的情况下默认学员晋升和结业。本研究旨在通过实证数据进一步了解这些方面。

方法

作者进行了一项实证主义探究,以更好地理解CCC在儿科住院医师培训项目中如何进行前瞻性委托决策。他们在8个地点进行了4次CCC会议观察,并对CCC成员进行了18次访谈,以确认、否定和完善基于文献综合的现有理论。

结果

基于文献的理论与本研究收集的实证数据吻合良好。因此,作者没有修改该理论,而是提出了三个新的半规律(实证主义研究中数据的重复模式),为他们之前对该模型的理解增添了细节和细微差别。这些新的半规律聚焦于:(i)阐述CCC的深思熟虑的行动如何更多地关注住院医师的发展而非委托;(ii)阐明努力工作不仅是为了协调数据匮乏或不一致的数据,也是为住院医师“做正确的事”而努力;(iii)描述各项目如何考虑偏见、公平和平等,其主动性从被动反应到积极主动范围广泛。

结论

本研究提供了CCC为支持住院医师发展而做出深思熟虑努力的证据。展望未来,应更一致地将类似重点放在公平的委托和晋升决策上,以平衡这两个基本目标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验