Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany and Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Plant Conservation and Utilization in Southern China, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xingke Road 723, Guangzhou, 510650, China.
Sichuan University of Arts and Science, Tashi Road 519, Dazhou, 635000, China.
New Phytol. 2024 Dec;244(5):2024-2035. doi: 10.1111/nph.20097. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
It is well-known that the mycorrhizal type of plants correlates with different modes of nutrient cycling and availability. However, the differences in drought tolerance between arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (EcM) plants remains poorly characterized. We synthesized a global dataset of four hydraulic traits associated with drought tolerance of 1457 woody species (1139 AM and 318 EcM species) at 308 field sites. We compared these traits between AM and EcM species, with evolutionary history (i.e. angiosperms vs gymnosperms), water availability (i.e. aridity index) and biomes considered as additional factors. Overall, we found that evolutionary history and biogeography influenced differences in hydraulic traits between mycorrhizal types. Specifically, we found that (1) AM angiosperms are less drought-tolerant than EcM angiosperms in wet regions or biomes, but AM gymnosperms are more drought-tolerant than EcM gymnosperms in dry regions or biomes, and (2) in both angiosperms and gymnosperms, variation in hydraulic traits as well as their sensitivity to water availability were higher in AM species than in EcM species. Our results suggest that global shifts in water availability (especially drought) may alter the biogeographic distribution and abundance of AM and EcM plants, with consequences for ecosystem element cycling and ultimately, the land carbon sink.
众所周知,菌根植物的类型与不同的养分循环和养分有效性模式相关。然而,丛枝菌根(AM)和外生菌根(EcM)植物的耐旱性差异仍未得到充分描述。我们综合了全球范围内 1457 种木本植物(1139 种 AM 和 318 种 EcM 植物)的 4 个与耐旱性相关的水力特性的数据集,这些特性在 308 个野外地点进行了研究。我们比较了 AM 和 EcM 植物之间的这些特性,同时考虑了进化历史(即被子植物与裸子植物)、水分可用性(即干旱指数)和生物群落等附加因素。总体而言,我们发现进化历史和生物地理学影响了菌根类型之间水力特性的差异。具体而言,我们发现:(1)在湿润地区或生物群落中,AM 被子植物比 EcM 被子植物更不耐旱,但在干旱地区或生物群落中,AM 裸子植物比 EcM 裸子植物更耐旱;(2)在被子植物和裸子植物中,AM 植物的水力特性及其对水分可用性的敏感性的变异性均高于 EcM 植物。我们的研究结果表明,全球水分可用性(特别是干旱)的变化可能会改变 AM 和 EcM 植物的生物地理分布和丰度,进而影响生态系统元素循环,并最终影响陆地碳汇。