Suppr超能文献

骶管硬膜外类固醇注射治疗慢性下腰痛或神经根性疼痛有效性的系统评价

Systematic review of the effectiveness of caudal epidural steroid injections in the treatment of chronic low back or radicular pain.

作者信息

Nagpal Ameet S, Vu To-Nhu, Gill Benjamin, Conger Aaron, McCormick Zachary L, Duszynski Belinda, Boies Brian T

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics & Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.

出版信息

Interv Pain Med. 2022 Oct 3;1(4):100149. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100149. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Determine the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of fluoroscopically- or ultrasound-guided caudal epidural steroid injections (ESIs) with or without catheter placement for the treatment of chronic low back (CLBP), radicular pain, and/or chronic post-surgical back pain (CPSBP).

DESIGN

Systematic review.

POPULATION

Adults ≥18 years with CLBP, radicular pain, or CPSBP ≥3 months.

INTERVENTION

Fluoroscopically- or ultrasound-guided caudal ESI with or without a catheter including epidural neuroplasty.

COMPARISON

Sham, placebo procedure, active standard care treatment, or none.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with reduction of pain by ​≥ ​50%. Secondary outcomes included functional improvement, analgesic use, subsequent spinal surgery, healthcare utilization, and mean improvement in pain. Reported adverse events were also cataloged.

METHODS

Four reviewers independently assessed publications before January 2, 2022 in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

RESULTS

Of 364 records screened, 23 publications met inclusion criteria. The success rates for the primary outcome could only be extrapolated from one study. Another study used a composite improvement scale that included pain and functional outcomes. The reported success rates in these two studies ranged from 40 to 58% at three months, 25%-67% at six months, and 58%-61% at one year. Data on secondary outcomes were limited; however, rates of functional improvement as measured by mean improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ranged from 2% to 55%.

CONCLUSION

There is moderate-quality evidence that caudal ESIs using an in-dwelling catheter for two days is an effective treatment for pain and dysfunction associated with disc herniation with radicular pain and for CPSBP at three, six, and 12 months. There is low-quality evidence supporting the effectiveness of other caudal ESI techniques for pain and dysfunction associated with central lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication, discogenic CLBP, and CLBP without disc herniation or radiculitis.

摘要

目的

确定在有或没有放置导管的情况下,透视引导或超声引导的骶管硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)治疗慢性下腰痛(CLBP)、神经根性疼痛和/或慢性术后背痛(CPSBP)的疗效、有效性和安全性。

设计

系统评价。

研究对象

年龄≥18岁、患有CLBP、神经根性疼痛或CPSBP且病程≥3个月的成年人。

干预措施

透视引导或超声引导的骶管ESI,有或没有导管,包括硬膜外神经成形术。

对照

假手术、安慰剂治疗、积极的标准护理治疗或不进行治疗。

观察指标

主要观察指标是疼痛减轻≥50%的个体比例。次要观察指标包括功能改善、镇痛药物使用、后续脊柱手术、医疗资源利用以及疼痛的平均改善情况。报告的不良事件也进行了分类记录。

方法

四位评审员独立评估了截至2022年1月2日在PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE和Scopus数据库中的出版物。使用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)框架评估证据质量。

结果

在筛选的364条记录中,23篇出版物符合纳入标准。主要观察指标的成功率只能从一项研究中推断得出。另一项研究使用了包括疼痛和功能结果的综合改善量表。这两项研究报告的三个月成功率为40%至58%,六个月为25%至67%,一年为58%至61%。关于次要观察指标的数据有限;然而,根据Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)平均改善情况衡量的功能改善率在2%至55%之间。

结论

有中等质量的证据表明,使用留置导管进行两天的骶管ESI是治疗与神经根性疼痛的椎间盘突出症相关的疼痛和功能障碍以及CPSBP在3个月、6个月和12个月时的有效治疗方法。有低质量的证据支持其他骶管ESI技术对与神经源性间歇性跛行的中央腰椎管狭窄、椎间盘源性CLBP以及无椎间盘突出或神经根炎的CLBP相关的疼痛和功能障碍的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13b5/11373049/3c3f0c66c375/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验