Dahal Prajwal, Parajuli Sabina, Pradhan Prajina
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Grande International Hospital.
Department of Pathology, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Jul 23;86(9):5377-5388. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002398. eCollection 2024 Sep.
With the advent of high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS), more thyroid nodules are being detected than ever before, and they are being identified at an earlier stage. It poses a challenge for radiologists and clinicians in deciding what to do next. Most nodules are benign and require no follow-up and intervention. Even highly suspicious nodules can be followed up, if the size is small. Variations in HRUS interpretation among radiologists are common, with frequent misidentifications between spongiform and solid-cystic lesions, hypoechoic and very hypoechoic nodules, and microcalcification and hyperechoic foci with comet-tail artifacts. Cystic lesions with echogenic contents are often confused with solid nodules, cystic papillary carcinoma thyroid is often confused with colloid cysts. The 2017 ACR TI-RADS (American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System) aims to standardize the interpretation of thyroid nodules and guide further management. Rather than giving specific diagnosis like colloid cyst, adenomatous nodule and papillary carcinoma; ACR TI-RADS classifies nodules from TI-RADS 1 to TI-RADS 5 based on HRUS characteristics and recommends further management. What the authors often read are textual contents that are theoretical, and in practice, the authors get confused while interpreting the characteristics of thyroid nodules. This review offers a detailed visual overview of the 2017 ACR TI-RADS and common thyroid conditions, explaining key features through imaging data and examples for consistent interpretation. Combining textual explanations with visual aids, this article provides practical guidance for interpreting thyroid nodules for radiologists, and clinicians seeking a clear understanding of thyroid imaging and pathology.
随着高分辨率超声检查(HRUS)的出现,甲状腺结节的检出率比以往任何时候都高,而且发现的时间也更早。这给放射科医生和临床医生在决定下一步该怎么做时带来了挑战。大多数结节是良性的,无需随访和干预。即使是高度可疑的结节,如果尺寸较小,也可以进行随访。放射科医生对HRUS的解读存在差异是很常见的,海绵状和实性囊性病变、低回声和极低回声结节、微钙化和伴有彗尾伪像的高回声灶之间经常出现误判。含有回声内容物的囊性病变常与实性结节混淆,甲状腺囊性乳头状癌常与胶样囊肿混淆。2017年美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR TI-RADS)旨在规范甲状腺结节的解读并指导进一步的管理。ACR TI-RADS不是给出诸如胶样囊肿、腺瘤样结节和乳头状癌等具体诊断,而是根据HRUS特征将结节从TI-RADS 1分类到TI-RADS 5,并推荐进一步的管理措施。作者们经常读到的是理论性的文字内容,而在实践中,作者们在解读甲状腺结节的特征时会感到困惑。这篇综述对2017年ACR TI-RADS和常见的甲状腺疾病进行了详细的可视化概述,通过影像数据和实例解释关键特征,以实现一致的解读。本文将文字解释与视觉辅助相结合,为放射科医生以及希望清晰了解甲状腺影像和病理学的临床医生解读甲状腺结节提供了实用指导。