Chen Hsiao-Tien, Tung Chien-Hsueh, Yu Ben-Hui, Chen Yi-Chun
Department of Chinese Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 22;15:1297854. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1297854. eCollection 2024.
A causal connection between oxidative stress and inflammation in diabetes, along with its associated renal and cardiovascular complications, has been established. Sixteen prescribed potentially renoprotective Chinese herbal medicines for diabetic kidney disease (PRCHMDKD), which are scientific Chinese medicine (botanical drug) and categorized into five classes (clearing heat, nourishing yin, dampness dispelling, tonifying qi, and harmonizing formulas), exhibit shared antioxidative properties and target multiple oxidative stress pathways. However, the time-response, cumulative effects, and safety (hyperkalemia risk) of these sixteen PRCHMDKD on cardiorenal and survival outcomes in patients with overall and advanced DKD remain unresolved.
This retrospective cohort study analyzed national health insurance claims data in 2000-2017. Four statistical methods, including Cox proportional hazards models, complementary restricted mean survival time (RMST), propensity score matching, and competing risk analysis for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), were employed to investigate this relationship. The study included 43,480 PRCHMDKD users and an equal number of matched nonusers within the overall DKD patient population. For advanced DKD patients, the cohort comprised 1,422 PRCHMDKD users and an equivalent number of matched nonusers.
PRCHMDKD use in overall and advanced, respectively, DKD patients was associated with time-dependent reductions in adjusted hazard ratios for ESRD (0.66; 95% CI, 0.61-0.70 vs. 0.81; 0.65-0.99), all-cause mortality (0.48; 0.47-0.49 vs. 0.59; 0.50-0.70), and cardiovascular mortality (0.50; 0.48-0.53 vs. 0.61; 0.45-0.82). Significant differences in RMST were observed in overall and advanced, respectively, DKD patients, favoring PRCHMDKD use: 0.31 years (95% CI, 0.24-0.38) vs. 0.61 years (0.13-1.10) for ESRD, 2.71 years (2.60-2.82) vs. 1.50 years (1.03-1.98) for all-cause mortality, and 1.18 years (1.09-1.28) vs. 0.59 years (0.22-0.95) for cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, hyperkalemia risk did not increase. These findings remained consistent despite multiple sensitivity analyses. Notably, the cumulative effects of utilizing at least four or five classes and multiple botanical drugs from the sixteen PRCHMDKD provided enhanced renoprotection for patients with both overall and advanced DKD. This suggests that there is involvement of multiple targets within the oxidative stress pathways associated with DKD.
This real-world study suggests that using these sixteen PRCHMDKD provides time-dependent cardiorenal and survival benefits while ensuring safety for DKD patients.
糖尿病中的氧化应激与炎症及其相关的肾脏和心血管并发症之间的因果关系已得到证实。16种用于糖尿病肾病的已获批潜在肾脏保护作用的中药(PRCHMDKD),这些是科学的中药(植物药),分为五类(清热、滋阴、祛湿、补气和调和方剂),具有共同的抗氧化特性,并针对多种氧化应激途径。然而,这16种PRCHMDKD对整体和晚期糖尿病肾病患者的心肾和生存结局的时间反应、累积效应及安全性(高钾血症风险)仍未明确。
这项回顾性队列研究分析了2000 - 2017年的国家医疗保险理赔数据。采用四种统计方法,包括Cox比例风险模型、互补受限平均生存时间(RMST)、倾向评分匹配以及终末期肾病(ESRD)的竞争风险分析,来研究这种关系。该研究纳入了43480名PRCHMDKD使用者以及在整体糖尿病肾病患者群体中数量相等的匹配非使用者。对于晚期糖尿病肾病患者,队列包括1422名PRCHMDKD使用者和数量相当的匹配非使用者。
在整体和晚期糖尿病肾病患者中,使用PRCHMDKD分别与ESRD调整后风险比的时间依赖性降低相关(0.66;95%置信区间,0.61 - 0.70对比0.81;0.65 - 0.99)、全因死亡率(0.48;0.47 - 0.49对比0.59;0.50 - 0.70)以及心血管死亡率(0.50;0.48 - 0.53对比0.61;0.45 - 0.82)。在整体和晚期糖尿病肾病患者中分别观察到RMST的显著差异,支持使用PRCHMDKD:ESRD方面为0.31年(95%置信区间,0.24 - 0.38)对比0.61年(0.13 - 1.10),全因死亡率方面为2.71年(2.60 - 2.82)对比1.50年(1.03 - 1.98),心血管死亡率方面为1.18年(1.09 - 1.28)对比0.59年(0.22 - 0.95)。此外,高钾血症风险并未增加。尽管进行了多次敏感性分析,这些发现仍然一致。值得注意的是,使用16种PRCHMDKD中至少四类和多种植物药的累积效应为整体和晚期糖尿病肾病患者提供了增强的肾脏保护作用。这表明在与糖尿病肾病相关的氧化应激途径中存在多个靶点的参与。
这项真实世界研究表明,使用这16种PRCHMDKD可为糖尿病肾病患者提供时间依赖性的心肾和生存益处,同时确保安全性。