Suppr超能文献

[心室和心房刺激方法在心动过速评估中的诊断价值]

[Diagnostic value of methods of ventricular and auricular stimulation in the evaluation of tachycardia].

作者信息

Perrot B, Thiel B, Clozel J P, Rizk J, Bara B, Cherrier F, Faivre G

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1985 Apr;78(4):569-77.

PMID:3923984
Abstract

The diagnostic value of programmed pacing in the investigation of tachycardia (greater than 5 premature complexes) was studied in 155 patients admitted for evaluation of dizzy attacks and/or tachycardia by determining a relationship between the induction of tachycardia by endocavitary pacing and the presence of spontaneous attacks on ECG and/or 24 hour Holter monitoring. Right atrial and ventricular programmed pacing comprised: an extrastimulus during sinus rhythm (method I), during paced rhythm (method II), 2 extrastimuli during sinus rhythm (method III) and paced rhythm (method IV). The protocol was applied in 20 cases of spontaneous atrial tachycardia (AT) and 40 patients without tachycardia, and in 20 cases of spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia (VTS) (Group A), 15 cases of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VTNS) (Group B), 20 cases of ventricular doublets or triplets on Holter monitoring (Group C) and 40 patients without ventricular arrhythmias. The following results were obtained: At atrial level, method I was associated with a 75% sensitivity and a 62.5 p. 100 specificity when the triggering of atrial echos was considered. It was difficult to induce AT with methods I, II and III (sensitivity 15, 20 and 45 p. 100 - but they were very specific (greater than 90 p. 100). The induction of echos with methods II, III and IV was very sensitive but not specific and could not be retained as a pathological criterion. Using method IV, only the triggering of sustained AT could be considered to have a good specificity (90 p. 100), but sensitivity remained low (30 p. 100). At ventricular level, more aggressive methods were needed to induce an arrhythmia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

通过确定心腔内起搏诱发心动过速与心电图和/或24小时动态心电图监测中自发发作之间的关系,对155例因眩晕发作和/或心动过速入院评估的患者进行了程控起搏在心动过速(超过5个早搏)检查中的诊断价值研究。右心房和心室程控起搏包括:窦性心律时的一个期外刺激(方法I)、起搏心律时的一个期外刺激(方法II)、窦性心律时的两个期外刺激(方法III)和起搏心律时的两个期外刺激(方法IV)。该方案应用于20例自发房性心动过速(AT)患者、40例无心动过速患者、20例自发持续性室性心动过速(VTS)患者(A组)、15例非持续性室性心动过速(VTNS)患者(B组)、20例动态心电图监测发现室性二联律或三联律患者(C组)以及40例无室性心律失常患者。结果如下:在心房水平,当考虑心房回波的触发时,方法I的敏感性为75%,特异性为62.5%。用方法I、II和III难以诱发AT(敏感性分别为15%、20%和45%,但特异性很高(大于90%)。方法II、III和IV诱发回波非常敏感但不特异,不能作为病理标准。使用方法IV,只有持续性AT的触发可认为具有良好的特异性(90%),但敏感性仍然较低(30%)。在心室水平,需要更积极的方法来诱发心律失常。(摘要截取自250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验