Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Sep 6;316(8):608. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03344-y.
Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) is a new technology for skin cancer diagnostics. However, the interobserver agreement (IOA) of known image markers of keratinocyte carcinomas (KC), including basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), as well as precursors, SCC in situ (CIS) and actinic keratosis (AK), remains unexplored. This study determined IOA on the presence or absence of 10 key LC-OCT image markers of KC and precursors, among evaluators new to LC-OCT with different levels of dermatologic imaging experience. Secondly, the frequency and association between reported image markers and lesion types, was determined. Six evaluators blinded to histopathologic diagnoses, assessed 75 LC-OCT images of KC (21 SCC; 21 BCC), CIS (12), and AK (21). For each image, evaluators independently reported the presence or absence of 10 predefined key image markers of KCs and precursors described in an LC-OCT literature review. Evaluators were stratified by experience-level as experienced (3) or novices (3) based on previous OCT and reflectance confocal microscopy usage. IOA was tested for all groups, using Conger's kappa coefficient (κ). The frequency of reported image marker and their association with lesion-types, were calculated as proportions and odds ratios (OR), respectively. Overall IOA was highest for the image markers lobules (κ = 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57;0.78) and clefting (κ = 0.63, CI 0.52;0.74), typically seen in BCC (94%;OR 143.2 and 158.7, respectively, p < 0.001), followed by severe dysplasia (κ = 0.42, CI 0.31;0.53), observed primarily in CIS (79%;OR 7.1, p < 0.001). The remaining seven image-markers had lower IOA (κ = 0.06-0.32) and were more evenly observed across lesion types. The lowest IOA was noted for a well-defined (κ = 0.07, CI 0;0.15) and interrupted dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) (κ = 0.06, CI -0.002;0.13). IOA was higher for all image markers among experienced evaluators versus novices. This study shows varying IOA for 10 key image markers of KC and precursors in LC-OCT images among evaluators new to the technology. IOA was highest for the assessments of lobules, clefting, and severe dysplasia while lowest for the assessment of the DEJ integrity.
线场共焦光学相干断层扫描(LC-OCT)是一种用于皮肤癌诊断的新技术。然而,角化细胞癌(KC)的已知图像标志物(包括基底细胞癌(BCC)和鳞状细胞癌(SCC)以及前体、原位鳞状细胞癌(CIS)和光化性角化病(AK))的观察者间一致性(IOA)仍未得到探索。本研究旨在确定在具有不同皮肤科成像经验水平的新评估者中,对于 10 个关键的 LC-OCT KC 和前体图像标志物的存在或缺失,评估者之间的 IOA。其次,确定报告的图像标志物与病变类型之间的频率和关联。六名评估者对 75 张 KC(21 个 SCC;21 个 BCC)、CIS(12 个)和 AK(21 个)的 LC-OCT 图像进行了盲法评估。对于每张图像,评估者独立报告了在 LC-OCT 文献综述中描述的 10 个预先定义的 KC 和前体的关键图像标志物的存在或缺失。评估者根据以前 OCT 和反射共聚焦显微镜的使用经验分为经验丰富(3 人)和新手(3 人)。使用 Conger's kappa 系数(κ)测试所有组别的 IOA。报告的图像标记物的频率及其与病变类型的关联分别以比例和比值比(OR)表示。对于通常见于 BCC 的图像标记物小叶(κ=0.68,95%置信区间(CI)0.57;0.78)和裂隙(κ=0.63,CI 0.52;0.74),总体 IOA 最高(94%;OR 143.2 和 158.7,分别,p<0.001),其次是严重发育不良(κ=0.42,CI 0.31;0.53),主要见于 CIS(79%;OR 7.1,p<0.001)。其余七个图像标记物的 IOA 较低(κ=0.06-0.32),并且在病变类型之间更均匀地观察到。最明确的(κ=0.07,CI 0;0.15)和中断的表皮-真皮交界处(DEJ)(κ=0.06,CI -0.002;0.13)具有最低的 IOA。在经验丰富的评估者中,所有图像标记物的 IOA 均高于新手。本研究表明,在新技术中,10 个 KC 和前体的关键图像标记物在 LC-OCT 图像中具有不同的 IOA。小叶、裂隙和严重发育不良的评估具有最高的 IOA,而 DEJ 完整性的评估则具有最低的 IOA。