Acad Med. 2024 Nov 1;99(11):1286-1297. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005858. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
With the introduction of physician assistants and nurse practitioners (i.e., advanced practice clinicians [APCs]), the landscape of graduate medical education (GME) has fundamentally changed. Whereas APCs' role in GME settings has been mainly described as substitutes for postgraduate medical trainees, APCs are increasingly considered integrated and collaborative team members. However, APCs' contributions to trainees' education and learning remain underexplored. This critical review synthesized the literature available on how APCs contribute to trainees' workplace learning and how these contributions are enabled.
The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from database inception dates to April 2023 for published articles reporting on educational or guiding behaviors of APCs in GME contexts, resulting in 1,830 articles for possible inclusion. Using a critical review approach, the analysis was informed by a previously published framework describing workplace guidance behaviors and the authors' clinical and research expertise.
A total of 58 articles were included in the study. Advanced practice clinicians contribute to trainees' workplace learning through a variety of guidance behaviors, including learning from patient care, demonstrating, support, socialization, feedback, involvement in evaluations, and other unspecified contributions. Thematic analysis indicated that APCs' contributions were enabled by their close working relationships with trainees, their unique perspective within the workplace, and the extent to which they were formally incorporated within workplace learning.
This critical review offers a concrete description of ways APCs are contributing to trainees' learning and education in the GME workplace across the literature. These results suggest that APCs could be a potentially untapped source for further optimizing workplace learning. However, unlocking this potential will require a shift in the conceptualization of APCs' role in the workplace. Opportunities for APC professional development and formalization of APCs' educational role should be considered.
随着医师助理和护士从业者(即高级实践临床医生[APCs])的引入,研究生医学教育(GME)的格局发生了根本性的变化。虽然 APC 在 GME 环境中的作用主要被描述为替代住院医师培训生,但 APC 越来越被认为是综合和协作的团队成员。然而,APC 对培训生教育和学习的贡献仍未得到充分探索。本批判性综述综合了现有文献,探讨了 APC 如何促进培训生的工作场所学习,以及这些贡献是如何实现的。
作者从数据库建立日期到 2023 年 4 月,在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO 上搜索了关于 APC 在 GME 背景下的教育或指导行为的已发表文章,共检索到 1830 篇可能纳入的文章。该分析采用了批判性综述方法,该方法的理论依据是一个先前发表的框架,描述了工作场所指导行为和作者的临床和研究专业知识。
共有 58 篇文章被纳入研究。高级实践临床医生通过各种指导行为促进培训生的工作场所学习,包括从患者护理中学习、示范、支持、社会化、反馈、参与评估和其他未指定的贡献。主题分析表明,APC 的贡献是通过他们与培训生的密切工作关系、他们在工作场所的独特视角以及他们在工作场所学习中被正式纳入的程度来实现的。
本批判性综述提供了文献中关于 APC 如何促进 GME 工作场所培训生学习和教育的具体描述。这些结果表明,APC 可能是进一步优化工作场所学习的潜在未开发资源。然而,要实现这一潜力,需要改变对 APC 在工作场所角色的概念化。应该考虑为 APC 提供专业发展机会和正式确定 APC 的教育角色。