• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过度自信的 CEO 是否会导致企业环境不当行为？来自中国的证据。

Does overconfident CEO lead to corporate environmental misconducts? Evidence from China.

机构信息

School of Business, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha, China.

School of Business, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0309957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309957. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0309957
PMID:39240907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11379234/
Abstract

Enterprises are drawing growing criticism for violating environmental rules. The research examines whether and how top executives' mental bias leads to corporate environmental misconduct (CEI). Drawing on upper echelon theory (UET) and agency theory, we link CEO overconfidence with CEI, and explore the boundary conditions from the perspective of management discretion at the governance level. Using a data set covering the Chinese listed enterprises from 2004 to 2016, the empirical results demonstrate that CEO overconfidence positively and markedly influenced CEI. Moreover, shareholder concentration and CEO duality reinforce the relationship between overconfidence and CEI, whereas board independence is the opposite. The findings clarify ecological outcomes of CEO overconfidence and have remarkable significance in theory and practice.

摘要

企业因违反环境法规而受到越来越多的批评。本研究考察了高管的心理偏见是否以及如何导致企业环境不当行为（CEI）。本研究借鉴高层梯队理论（UET）和代理理论，将 CEO 过度自信与 CEI 联系起来，并从治理层面的管理自由裁量权的角度探讨了边界条件。利用涵盖 2004 年至 2016 年中国上市公司的数据集，实证结果表明，CEO 过度自信显著正向影响 CEI。此外，股东集中和 CEO 双重身份强化了过度自信与 CEI 之间的关系，而董事会独立性则相反。这些发现阐明了 CEO 过度自信的生态后果，在理论和实践上具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/426f/11379234/69ae05335118/pone.0309957.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/426f/11379234/237c0ffbafb9/pone.0309957.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/426f/11379234/187697f1b39b/pone.0309957.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/426f/11379234/69ae05335118/pone.0309957.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/426f/11379234/237c0ffbafb9/pone.0309957.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/426f/11379234/187697f1b39b/pone.0309957.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/426f/11379234/69ae05335118/pone.0309957.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Does overconfident CEO lead to corporate environmental misconducts? Evidence from China.过度自信的 CEO 是否会导致企业环境不当行为？来自中国的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0309957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309957. eCollection 2024.
2
Key Subordinate Executive Governance, CEO Overconfidence, and Accounting Conservatism: From the Perspective of Sustainable Development.关键下属高管治理、首席执行官过度自信与会计稳健性：基于可持续发展视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 2;12:799221. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.799221. eCollection 2021.
3
CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Innovation Outcomes: Evidence From China.首席执行官过度自信与企业创新成果：来自中国的证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 7;13:760102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.760102. eCollection 2022.
4
The Effect of Chief Executive Officer and Board Prior Corporate Social Responsibility Experiences on Their Focal Firm's Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Effect of Chief Executive Officer Overconfidence.首席执行官和董事会先前的企业社会责任经历对其重点企业的企业社会责任的影响：首席执行官过度自信的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:891331. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.891331. eCollection 2022.
5
Assessing Influence Mechanism of Management Overconfidence, Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Corporate Value: The Moderating Effect of Government Environmental Governance and Media Attention.评估管理层过度自信、企业环境责任和企业价值的影响机制：政府环境治理和媒体关注的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):577. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010577.
6
CEO Overconfidence, Corporate Governance, and R&D Smoothing in Technology-Based Entrepreneurial Firms.首席执行官过度自信、公司治理与科技型创业公司的研发平滑
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 13;13:944117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.944117. eCollection 2022.
7
Do Tournament Incentives Matter for CEOs to Be Environmentally Responsible? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies.高管薪酬锦标赛激励对 CEO 环境责任的影响研究——来自中国上市公司的证据
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 1;19(1):470. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010470.
8
Effect of senior executives' overseas experience on corporate green innovation.高管海外工作经验对企业绿色创新的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 May 2;19(5):e0296716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296716. eCollection 2024.
9
CEO discretion and enterprise digital transformation.首席执行官的自由裁量权与企业数字化转型。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 10;10(1):e23468. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23468. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
10
Executives' academic experience and corporate social responsibility: A case study in China.高管的学术经历与企业社会责任：中国的一项案例研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0305813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305813. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Do CEOs with government work experience foster enterprise investment in pollution control?有政府工作经验的首席执行官会促进企业对污染控制的投资吗？
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0317903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317903. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of public environmental concern on environmental pollution: The moderating effect of government environmental regulation.公众环境关注对环境污染的影响：政府环境监管的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0290255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290255. eCollection 2023.
2
Environmental protection tax and green innovation of heavily polluting enterprises: A quasi-natural experiment based on the implementation of China's environmental protection tax law.环境保护税与重污染企业绿色创新：基于中国实施环境保护税法的准自然实验
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 15;18(6):e0286253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286253. eCollection 2023.
3
Financial constraints, government subsidies, and corporate innovation.
财政约束、政府补贴与企业创新。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 10;16(11):e0259642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259642. eCollection 2021.
4
Assessment on the effectiveness of environmental regulation in China-evidence from a panel data analysis.中国环境规制有效性评估——基于面板数据分析的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(30):37363-37376. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08583-w. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
5
The Influence of Top Managers on Environmental Information Disclosure: The Moderating Effect of Company's Environmental Performance.高管影响与环境信息披露——公司环境绩效的调节作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;16(7):1167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071167.
6
Sensitive questions in surveys.调查中的敏感问题。
Psychol Bull. 2007 Sep;133(5):859-83. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859.