Vaynrub Max, Healey John H, Morris Carol D, Shahzad Farooq
From the Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (Vaynrub, Healey, and Morris), Department of Surgery, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (Shahzad).
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025 Feb 1;33(3):e124-e135. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00502. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
Internal hemipelvectomy is preferred to hindquarter amputation for pelvic tumor resection if a functional lower extremity can be obtained without compromising oncologic principles; multidisciplinary advances in orthopaedic and plastic surgery reconstruction have made this possible. The goals of skeletal reconstruction are restoration of pelvic and spinopelvic skeletal continuity, maintenance of limb length, and creation of a functional hip joint. The goals of soft-tissue reconstruction are stable coverage of skeletal, prosthetic, and neurovascular structures, elimination of dead space, and prevention of herniation. Pelvic resections are divided into four types: type I (ilium), type II (acetabulum), type III (ischiopubic rami), and type IV (sacrum). Type I and IV resections resulting in pelvic discontinuity are often reconstructed with vascularized bone flaps and instrumentation. Type II resections, which traditionally result in the greatest functional morbidity, are often reconstructed with hip transposition, allograft, prosthesis, and allograft-prosthetic composites. Type III resections require soft-tissue repair, sometimes with flaps and mesh, but generally no skeletal reconstruction. Extension of resection into the sacrum can result in additional skeletal instability, neurologic deficit, and soft-tissue insufficiency, necessitating a robust reconstructive strategy. Internal hemipelvectomy creates complex deficits that often require advanced multidisciplinary reconstructions to optimize outcomes and minimize complications.
如果在不违背肿瘤学原则的情况下能够保留功能正常的下肢,那么对于骨盆肿瘤切除而言,半骨盆切除术比后半骨盆截肢术更为可取;骨科和整形外科重建技术的多学科进展使得这成为可能。骨骼重建的目标是恢复骨盆和脊柱骨盆的骨骼连续性、维持肢体长度以及创建一个功能正常的髋关节。软组织重建的目标是稳定覆盖骨骼、假体和神经血管结构、消除死腔以及防止疝形成。骨盆切除术分为四种类型:I型(髂骨)、II型(髋臼)、III型(坐骨耻骨支)和IV型(骶骨)。导致骨盆不连续的I型和IV型切除术通常采用带血管蒂骨瓣和内固定进行重建。传统上导致最大功能障碍的II型切除术通常采用髋关节移位、同种异体骨移植、假体以及同种异体骨 - 假体复合物进行重建。III型切除术需要软组织修复,有时采用皮瓣和补片,但一般不需要骨骼重建。切除范围扩展至骶骨会导致额外的骨骼不稳定、神经功能缺损和软组织不足,因此需要强有力的重建策略。半骨盆切除术会造成复杂的缺损,通常需要先进的多学科重建来优化治疗效果并减少并发症。