1Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
2Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Sep 6;41(5):579-588. doi: 10.3171/2024.5.SPINE24325. Print 2024 Nov 1.
Depression and anxiety are associated with poor outcomes following spine surgery. However, the influence of these conditions on achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following lumbar spine surgery, as well as the potential compounding effects of comorbid depression and anxiety, is not well understood. This study explores the impact of comorbid depression and anxiety on long-term clinical outcomes following surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
This study was a retrospective analysis of the multicenter, prospectively collected Quality Outcomes Database (QOD). Patients with surgically treated grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis from 12 centers were included. Preoperative baseline characteristics and comorbidities were recorded, including self-reported depression and/or anxiety. Pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded: the numeric rating scale (NRS) score for back pain (NRS-BP), NRS score for leg pain (NRS-LP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EQ-5D. Patients were grouped into 3 cohorts: no self-reported depression or anxiety (non-SRD/A), self-reported depression or anxiety (SRD/A), or presence of both comorbidities (SRD+A). Changes in PROs over time, satisfaction rates, and rates of MCID were compared. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to establish independent associations.
Of the 608 patients, there were 452 (74.3%) with non-SRD/A, 81 (13.3%) with SRD/A, and 75 (12.3%) with SRD+A. Overall, 91.8% and 80.4% of patients had ≥ 24 and ≥ 60 months of follow-up, respectively. Baseline PROs were universally inferior for the SRD+A cohort. However, at 60-month follow-up, changes in all PROs were greatest for the SRD+A cohort, resulting in nonsignificant differences in absolute NRS-BP, NRS-LP, ODI, and EQ-5D across the 3 groups. MCID was achieved for the SRD+A cohort at similar rates to the non-SRD/A cohort. All groups achieved > 80% satisfaction rates with surgery without significant differences across the cohorts (p = 0.79). On multivariable regression, comorbid depression and anxiety were associated with worse baseline PROs, but they had no impact on 60-month PROs or 60-month achievement of MCIDs.
Despite lower baseline PROs, patients with comorbid depression and anxiety achieved comparable rates of MCID and satisfaction after surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis to those without either condition. This quality-of-life benefit was durable at 5-year follow-up. These data suggest that patients with self-reported comorbid depression and anxiety should not be excluded from consideration of surgical intervention and often substantially benefit from surgery.
抑郁和焦虑与脊柱手术后的不良结局相关。然而,这些情况对腰椎手术后达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)的影响,以及共患抑郁和焦虑的潜在复合效应,尚未得到很好的理解。本研究探讨了共患抑郁和焦虑对退行性腰椎滑脱症手术治疗后长期临床结局的影响。
这是一项对多中心前瞻性收集的质量结果数据库(QOD)的回顾性分析。纳入了 12 个中心接受手术治疗的 1 级腰椎滑脱症患者。记录了术前基线特征和合并症,包括自我报告的抑郁和/或焦虑。记录了术前和术后的患者报告结局(PROs):数字评分量表(NRS)腰痛评分(NRS-BP)、NRS 腿痛评分(NRS-LP)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)和 EQ-5D。患者分为 3 组:无自我报告的抑郁或焦虑(非 SRD/A)、自我报告的抑郁或焦虑(SRD/A)或同时存在两种合并症(SRD+A)。比较了随时间变化的 PROs 变化、满意度和 MCID 达到率。进行了多变量回归分析以确定独立关联。
在 608 名患者中,452 名(74.3%)为非 SRD/A,81 名(13.3%)为 SRD/A,75 名(12.3%)为 SRD+A。总体而言,91.8%和 80.4%的患者分别有≥24 和≥60 个月的随访。SRD+A 队列的基线 PROs 普遍较差。然而,在 60 个月的随访时,SRD+A 队列的所有 PROs 变化最大,导致 3 组之间的绝对 NRS-BP、NRS-LP、ODI 和 EQ-5D 无显著差异。SRD+A 队列达到 MCID 的比例与非 SRD/A 队列相似。所有组的手术满意度均>80%,且组间无显著差异(p=0.79)。多变量回归分析显示,共患抑郁和焦虑与基线 PROs 较差相关,但与 60 个月的 PROs 或 60 个月的 MCID 达到无关。
尽管基线 PROs 较低,但与无任何一种疾病的患者相比,伴发抑郁和焦虑的患者在腰椎滑脱症手术后达到 MCID 和满意度的比例相当。这种生活质量获益在 5 年随访时仍然持久。这些数据表明,不应排除自我报告共患抑郁和焦虑的患者考虑手术干预,且他们通常会从手术中显著获益。