Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Nov;30(11):1112.e1-1112.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.08.021. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
Febrile neutropenia is a common complication of conditioning chemotherapy for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), but a major barrier for optimal treatment of febrile neutropenia is historical penicillin allergies. Our group recently published a development of a clinical pipeline for delabeling penicillin allergies in adult patients planned to undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). In this retrospective cohort study, we followed patients to evaluate their outcomes during inpatient admission for HSCT. We hypothesized that, among patients planned for HSCT with a self-reported penicillin allergy, completing penicillin allergy testing (amoxicillin ingestion challenge with or without concomitant penicillin skin testing) prior to HSCT admission would be associated with differences in inpatient treatment for febrile neutropenia (including antibiotic selection and timing of antibiotic administration) and improved inpatient resource utilization (including nursing and inpatient physician consults). We identified patients with a self-reported penicillin allergy who answered a penicillin allergy questionnaire and were subsequently admitted to our institution for HSCT. We divided the cohort into 2 groups: patients whose penicillin allergy was evaluated prior to admission (EPTA) and patients whose penicillin allergy was not evaluated prior to admission (NEPTA). We then performed comparison between the 2 groups for general clinical outcomes of HSCT admission (duration of admission, need for ICU transfer, readmission rate, etc.), febrile neutropenia treatment, and inpatient resource utilization. Statistics were calculated using the nonparametric 2-tailed Fisher exact test for categorical outcomes and the nonparametric 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U test for numerical outcomes. Within our cohort, 35 patients completed penicillin allergy testing prior to HSCT admission (EPTA) and 44 patients did not (NEPTA). Demographics were similar between these groups, and there was no significant difference in the rate of febrile neutropenia during HSCT admission (EPTA 64% versus NEPTA 66%, P = 1.00). EPTA patients were significantly more likely to receive standard first-line antibiotics (cefepime or ceftazidime) for febrile neutropenia (EPTA 95% versus NEPTA 65%, P = .015) and time between febrile neutropenia onset and antibiotic administration was shorter (EPTA mean 66 mins versus NEPTA mean 121 mins, P = .0058). No patients in the EPTA group experienced an immediate hypersensitivity reaction (hives, anaphylaxis, etc.) or severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) during HSCT admission. EPTA patients were also significantly less likely to require 1:1 nursing for antibiotic test doses, challenges, and desensitizations (EPTA 0% versus NEPTA 49%, P < .0001); less likely to require inpatient allergy consult (EPTA 0% versus NEPTA 12%, P = .031); and less likely to require inpatient antimicrobial stewardship consult (EPTA 0% versus NEPTA 13%, P = .013) during their HSCT admission. In summary, patients who completed penicillin allergy testing prior to HSCT admission were more likely to receive first-line antibiotics and received antibiotics more rapidly for treatment of febrile neutropenia. Furthermore, patients who completed penicillin allergy testing prior to HSCT admission were less likely to require 1:1 nursing, inpatient allergy consults, and inpatient antimicrobial stewardship consults during HSCT admission.
发热性中性粒细胞减少症是造血干细胞移植(HSCT)条件化疗的常见并发症,但发热性中性粒细胞减少症的最佳治疗的主要障碍是历史青霉素过敏。我们小组最近发表了为计划接受造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的成年患者制定的消除青霉素过敏标签的临床方案。在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们对患者进行随访,以评估他们在 HSCT 入院期间的住院治疗结果。我们假设,在计划接受 HSCT 且自述有青霉素过敏史的患者中,在 HSCT 入院前进行青霉素过敏测试(阿莫西林摄入挑战,伴或不伴同时进行青霉素皮肤测试),与发热性中性粒细胞减少症的住院治疗(包括抗生素选择和抗生素给药时间)以及改善住院资源利用(包括护理和住院医师咨询)方面存在差异。我们确定了有自我报告的青霉素过敏史且回答了青霉素过敏问卷的患者,并随后被收治到我们机构进行 HSCT。我们将队列分为两组:在入院前评估青霉素过敏的患者(EPTA)和在入院前未评估青霉素过敏的患者(NEPTA)。然后,我们比较了两组 HSCT 入院的一般临床结果(住院时间、是否需要 ICU 转移、再入院率等)、发热性中性粒细胞减少症的治疗和住院资源利用。使用非参数 2 尾 Fisher 精确检验对分类结果和非参数 2 尾 Mann-Whitney U 检验对数值结果进行统计分析。在我们的队列中,有 35 名患者在 HSCT 入院前完成了青霉素过敏测试(EPTA),44 名患者未完成(NEPTA)。这些组之间的人口统计学特征相似,HSCT 入院期间发热性中性粒细胞减少症的发生率无显著差异(EPTA 为 64%,NEPTA 为 66%,P=1.00)。EPTA 患者更有可能接受发热性中性粒细胞减少症的标准一线抗生素(头孢吡肟或头孢他啶)(EPTA 为 95%,NEPTA 为 65%,P=0.015),且抗生素给药时间更短(EPTA 平均为 66 分钟,NEPTA 平均为 121 分钟,P=0.0058)。EPTA 组患者在 HSCT 入院期间均未发生速发型过敏反应(荨麻疹、过敏反应等)或严重皮肤不良反应(SCAR)。EPTA 患者也不太需要 1:1 护理用于抗生素测试剂量、挑战和脱敏(EPTA 为 0%,NEPTA 为 49%,P<0.0001);不太需要住院过敏咨询(EPTA 为 0%,NEPTA 为 12%,P=0.031);和不太需要住院抗菌药物管理咨询(EPTA 为 0%,NEPTA 为 13%,P=0.013)。总之,在 HSCT 入院前完成青霉素过敏测试的患者更有可能接受一线抗生素治疗,并更快地接受抗生素治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少症。此外,在 HSCT 入院期间,完成青霉素过敏测试的患者不太需要 1:1 护理、住院过敏咨询和住院抗菌药物管理咨询。