Mena Jose, Rodriguez Marc, Sternberg Scot B, Graham Timothy, Fernandez Leonor, Benneyan James, Salant Talya, Pollack Amie, Ricci Dru, Phillips Russell S, Shafiq Umber, Aronson Mark D, Schiff Gordon D, Denker Bradley M
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Am J Med. 2025 Jan;138(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.08.032. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
Community-acquired acute kidney injury (CA-acute kidney injury) is under-recognized in the outpatient setting and is associated with adverse outcomes.
We analyzed the incidence of CA-acute kidney injury in an academic primary care practice and community health center and assessed recognition and follow-up as determined by repeat creatinine measurement (closed-loop). We reviewed 93,259 specimens for 36,593 unique patients from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2021.
There were 220 unique patients with CA-acute kidney injury, defined as a > 75% increase in creatinine from baseline (incidence: 150/100,000; 0.15% per year). One hundred thirty seven patients (62.3%) had repeat serum creatinine performed within 30 days. Chart reviews of the 83 (37.72%) patients with open loops found there was no follow-up creatinine ordered in 69/83 (83.1%) patients. Mean baseline creatinine was higher and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in the closed-loop group (0.92 ± 0.4 mg/dL; 84.45 ± 27.49 mL/min) vs the open-loop group (0.63 ± 0.34 mg/dL; 105.19 ± 26.67 mL/min) (P < .0001). Preexisting chronic kidney disease was more prevalent in closed-loop patients (35/137; 25.6%) compared with those with open loops (3/83; 3.6%). Patients with baseline chronic kidney disease were more likely to have closed loops. Progression to new chronic kidney disease was common among CA-acute kidney injury patients, occurring in 25% of open-loop and 24.1% of closed-loop patients. New baseline eGFR was lower in all groups.
Clinicians frequently overlooked a clinically significant change in eGFR, especially when the baseline creatinine and incident creatinine levels were in the "normal" range.
社区获得性急性肾损伤(CA - 急性肾损伤)在门诊环境中未得到充分认识,且与不良预后相关。
我们分析了一家学术性初级保健机构和社区健康中心中CA - 急性肾损伤的发病率,并通过重复肌酐测量(闭环)评估了其识别情况和随访情况。我们回顾了2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间36593例独特患者的93259份样本。
有220例独特的CA - 急性肾损伤患者,定义为肌酐较基线水平升高>75%(发病率:150/100000;每年0.15%)。137例患者(62.3%)在30天内进行了重复血清肌酐检测。对83例(37.72%)存在开放环的患者进行病历审查发现,69/83例(83.1%)患者未安排后续肌酐检测。闭环组的平均基线肌酐水平较高,估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)较低(0.92±0.4mg/dL;84.45±27.49mL/min),而开放环组分别为(0.63±0.34mg/dL;105.19±26.67mL/min)(P<.0001)。与开放环患者(3/83;3.6%)相比,闭环患者中既往慢性肾脏病更为普遍(35/137;25.6%)。基线存在慢性肾脏病的患者更有可能处于闭环状态。CA - 急性肾损伤患者进展为新的慢性肾脏病很常见,在开放环患者中占25%,在闭环患者中占24.1%。所有组的新基线eGFR均较低。
临床医生经常忽视eGFR的临床显著变化,尤其是当基线肌酐和发病时肌酐水平处于“正常”范围时。