Kallet Richard H, Lipnick Michael S
Mr. Kallet and Dr. Lipnick are affiliated with Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco at San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Respir Care. 2025 Apr;70(4):427-433. doi: 10.4187/respcare.12269. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
Mechanical power (MP) applied to the respiratory system (MP) is associated with ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and ARDS mortality. Absent automated ventilator MP measurements, the alternative is clinically unwieldy equations. However, simplified surrogate formulas are now available and accurately reflect values produced by airway pressure-volume curves. This retrospective, observational study examined whether the surrogate pressure -control equation alone could accurately assess mortality risk in subjects with ARDS managed almost exclusively with volume control (VC) ventilation. Nine hundred and forty-eight subjects were studied in whom invasive mechanical ventilation and implementation of ARDS Network ventilator protocols commenced ≤ 24 h after ARDS onset and who survived > 24 h. MP was calculated as 0.098 x breathing frequency x tidal volume x (PEEP + driving pressure). MP was assessed as a risk factor for hospital mortality and compared between non-survivors and survivors across Berlin definition classifications. In addition, mortality was compared across 4 MP thresholds associated with VILI or mortality (ie, 15, 20, 25, and 30 J/min). MP was associated with increased mortality risk: odds ratio (95% CI) of 1.06 (1.04-1.07) J/min ( < .001). Median MP differentiated non-survivors from survivors in mild (24.7 J/min vs 18.5 J/min, respectively, = .034), moderate (25.7 J/min vs 21.3 J/min, respectively, < .001), and severe ARDS (28.7 J/min vs 23.5 J/min, respectively, < .001). Across 4 MP thresholds, mortality increased from 23-29% when MP was ≤ threshold versus 38-51% when MP was > threshold ( < .001). In the > cohort, the odds ratio (95% CI) increased from 2.03 (1.34-3.12) to 2.51 (1.87-3.33). The pressure control surrogate formula is sufficiently accurate to assess mortality in ARDS, even when using VC ventilation. In our subjects when MP exceeds established cutoff values for VILI or mortality risk, we found mortality risk consistently increased by a factor of > 2.0.
施加于呼吸系统的机械功率(MP)与呼吸机诱发的肺损伤(VILI)及急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)死亡率相关。由于缺乏自动测量呼吸机MP的方法,替代方法是临床应用不便的公式。然而,现在已有简化的替代公式,且能准确反映气道压力-容积曲线得出的值。这项回顾性观察性研究探讨了仅使用替代压力控制方程能否准确评估几乎完全采用容量控制(VC)通气治疗的ARDS患者的死亡风险。研究了948例患者,这些患者在ARDS发病后≤24小时开始有创机械通气并实施ARDS网络呼吸机方案,且存活时间>24小时。MP的计算方法为0.098×呼吸频率×潮气量×(呼气末正压+驱动压)。将MP评估为医院死亡率的危险因素,并在柏林定义分类的非幸存者和幸存者之间进行比较。此外,还比较了与VILI或死亡率相关的4个MP阈值(即15、20、25和30焦耳/分钟)下的死亡率。MP与死亡风险增加相关:每增加1.06(1.04 - 1.07)焦耳/分钟,优势比(95%置信区间)为1.06(<0.001)。MP中位数可区分轻度(分别为24.7焦耳/分钟和18.5焦耳/分钟,P = 0.034)、中度(分别为25.7焦耳/分钟和21.3焦耳/分钟,P < <0.001)和重度ARDS(分别为28.7焦耳/分钟和23.5焦耳/分钟,P < <0.001)的非幸存者和幸存者。在4个MP阈值范围内,当MP≤阈值时死亡率为23% - 29%,而当MP>阈值时死亡率为38% - 51%(P < <0.001)。在>队列中,优势比(95%置信区间)从2.03(1.34 - 3.12)增加到2.51(1.87 - 3.33)。压力控制替代公式足以准确评估ARDS患者的死亡率,即使使用VC通气时也是如此。在我们的研究对象中,当MP超过既定的VILI或死亡风险临界值时,我们发现死亡风险持续增加>2.0倍。