Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive care, and Emergency medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Department of Anaesthetics and Critical Care, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, Cornwall, UK.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Sep 6;24(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02692-6.
Mentorship is crucial to career advancement, medical education, and psychosocial support, especially for women and minorities. Although anesthesia mentoring programs have shown promise, there are no survey data regarding mentor-mentee relationship dynamics. This study aimed to explore the dynamics of the anesthesia mentor/mentee relationship.
A open cross-sectional web-based survey was distributed by the European Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care and European Society of Regional Anesthesia to European anesthesiologists. Participation was anonymous and consent was obtained. The study evaluated responses relating to preferences, facilitators, and barriers to mentorship relationships along with sociodemographic information.
In total, 543 anesthesiologists responded to the survey, and 406 (111 mentees, 49 mentors, 193 both, 53 neither) responded to questions regarding mentorship. 184 anesthesiologists identified as woman and 22 as other genders (non-binary, transgender, gender-fluid, and self-described gender). Moreover, 250 anesthesiologists identified as white. Both mentors and mentees indicated that personal compatibility was the most important factor for successful mentorship. Barriers to mentorship included time consumption and perceived lack of interest from the mentor and mentee. Both mentors and mentees benefited from this relationship. The former reported feeling helpful, and the latter supported the development of clinical skills. The mentors indicated that their participation was important for protecting against burnout/exhaustion and impostor syndrome. Participants reported a preference for mentorship programs organized at the departmental level, offered at the start of the anesthesiology education curricula. Women were more likely to feel a 'lack of interest' in mentoring them as a barrier (OR = 2.49, P = 0.033). Gender was a barrier for mentors of other genders (OR = 23.9, P = 0.0027) and ethnicity (OR = 48.0, P = 0.0023). White mentees found gender (OR = 0.14, P = 0.021) and ethnicity (OR = 0.11, P = 0.048) to be less important barriers to successful mentorship relationship.
When possible, programs should prioritize matching mentors and mentees based on personal compatibility and experience in the mentee's area of interest. Addressing the perceived lack of interest in mentoring is essential for promoting diversity, equality, and inclusion within anesthesiology, as well as and uplifting women and minorities.
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05968339, First posted (01/08/2023).
指导对于职业发展、医学教育和心理社会支持至关重要,尤其是对女性和少数族裔而言。尽管麻醉指导计划已经显示出了前景,但目前还没有关于导师-学员关系动态的调查数据。本研究旨在探讨麻醉导师/学员关系的动态。
通过欧洲麻醉学会和重症监护学会以及欧洲区域麻醉学会向欧洲麻醉师分发了一份开放式横断面网络调查。参与是匿名的,并且获得了同意。该研究评估了与指导关系相关的偏好、促进因素和障碍的反应,以及社会人口统计学信息。
共有 543 名麻醉师对该调查做出了回应,其中 406 名(111 名学员、49 名导师、193 名两者兼有、53 名两者都没有)对有关指导的问题做出了回应。184 名麻醉师认为自己是女性,22 名认为自己是其他性别(非二元性别、跨性别、性别流动和自我描述的性别)。此外,250 名麻醉师认为自己是白人。导师和学员都表示,个人兼容性是成功指导的最重要因素。指导关系的障碍包括时间消耗以及导师和学员感知到的缺乏兴趣。导师和学员都从这种关系中受益。前者表示感到有帮助,后者则支持临床技能的发展。导师表示,他们的参与对于防止倦怠/疲惫和冒名顶替综合征很重要。参与者表示,他们更喜欢在部门层面组织、在麻醉学教育课程开始时提供的指导计划。女性更有可能认为缺乏指导她们的兴趣是一个障碍(OR=2.49,P=0.033)。性别是其他性别导师的障碍(OR=23.9,P=0.0027)和种族(OR=48.0,P=0.0023)。白人学员发现性别(OR=0.14,P=0.021)和种族(OR=0.11,P=0.048)是成功指导关系的较少障碍。
在可能的情况下,计划应优先根据个人兼容性和学员感兴趣领域的经验来匹配导师和学员。解决缺乏指导兴趣的问题对于促进麻醉学中的多样性、平等和包容,以及提升女性和少数族裔的地位至关重要。
Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT05968339,首次发布(2023 年 1 月 8 日)。