Faustino Marisa, Gusmão Leonor, Amorim António, Kling Daniel, Pinto Nádia
Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto (FCUP), Portugal; Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, Portugal.
DNA Diagnostic Laboratory (LDD), State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2025 Jan;74:103128. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103128. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
The unique features of the X chromosome can be crucial to complement autosomal profiling or to disentangle complex kinship problems, providing in some cases a similar or even greater power than autosomes in paternity/maternity investigations. While theoretical and informatics approaches for pairwise X-linked kinship analyses are well established for euploid individuals, these are still lacking for individuals with an X chromosome aneuploidy. To trigger the fulfilment of this gap, this research presents a mathematical framework that enables the quantification of DNA evidence in pairwise kinship analyses, involving two non-inbred individuals, one of whom with a non-mosaic X chromosome aneuploidy: Trisomy X (47, XXX), Klinefelter (47, XXY) or Turner (45, X0) syndrome. As previously developed for a regular number of chromosomes, this approach relies on the probability of related individuals sharing identical-by-descent (IBD) alleles at one specific locus and it can be applied to any set of independently transmitted markers, with no gametic association in the population. The kinship hypotheses mostly considered in forensic casework are specifically addressed in this work, but the reasoning and procedure can be applied to virtually any pairwise kinship problem under the referred assumptions. Algebraic formulae for joint genotypic probabilities cover all the possible genotypic configurations and pedigrees. Compared with the analyses assuming individuals with a regular number of chromosomes, complicating factors rely on the different possibilities for both the parental origin of the error (either maternal or paternal), and the type of error occurred (either meiotic or post-zygotic mitotic). These imply that a non-inbred female with Triple X or a male with Klinefelter syndrome may carry two IBD alleles at the same locus. Thus, and contrarily to what occurs for the standard case, IBD partitions depend not only on the kinship hypothesis under analysis but also on the genotypic configuration of the analyzed individuals. For some cases, parameters of interest can be inferred, while for others recommended values based on the available literature are provided. This work is the starting point to analyze X-chromosomal data under the scope of kinship problems, involving individuals with aneuploidies, as it will enhance the quantification of the DNA evidence not only in forensics but also in the medical genetics field. We hope it will trigger the development of approaches including other complicating factors, as a greater number of individuals, possibility of the occurrence of mutations and/or silent alleles, as well as the analysis of linked markers.
X染色体的独特特征对于补充常染色体分析或解决复杂的亲属关系问题至关重要,在某些情况下,其在亲子鉴定中提供的效力与常染色体相似甚至更强。虽然针对整倍体个体的成对X连锁亲属关系分析的理论和信息学方法已经成熟,但对于X染色体非整倍体个体仍然缺乏相关研究。为填补这一空白,本研究提出了一个数学框架,用于在成对亲属关系分析中量化DNA证据,涉及两个非近亲个体,其中一个患有非嵌合型X染色体非整倍体:X三体综合征(47, XXX)、克兰费尔特综合征(47, XXY)或特纳综合征(45, X0)。如同先前针对正常染色体数所开发的方法,该方法依赖于相关个体在一个特定基因座上共享同源等位基因(IBD)的概率,并且可以应用于任何一组独立遗传的标记,群体中不存在配子关联。本研究特别探讨了法医案件工作中最常考虑的亲属关系假设,但在所述假设下,推理和程序实际上可应用于任何成对亲属关系问题。联合基因型概率的代数公式涵盖了所有可能的基因型组合和谱系。与假设个体具有正常染色体数的分析相比,复杂因素在于错误的亲本来源(母方或父方)以及发生的错误类型(减数分裂或合子后有丝分裂)存在不同可能性。这意味着患有X三体综合征的非近亲女性或患有克兰费尔特综合征的男性可能在同一基因座携带两个IBD等位基因。因此,与标准情况不同,IBD划分不仅取决于所分析的亲属关系假设,还取决于被分析个体的基因型组合。对于某些情况,可以推断出感兴趣的参数,而对于其他情况,则根据现有文献提供推荐值。这项工作是在亲属关系问题范围内分析涉及非整倍体个体的X染色体数据的起点,因为它不仅将加强法医领域,也将加强医学遗传学领域中DNA证据的量化。我们希望它将引发包括其他复杂因素的方法的发展,例如更多个体、突变和/或沉默等位基因出现的可能性以及连锁标记的分析。