Suppr超能文献

上、下呼吸道感染最佳抗生素治疗疗程的证据基础:一项伞状综述

The evidence base for the optimal antibiotic treatment duration of upper and lower respiratory tract infections: an umbrella review.

作者信息

Kuijpers Suzanne M E, Buis David T P, Ziesemer Kirsten A, van Hest Reinier M, Schade Rogier P, Sigaloff Kim C E, Prins Jan M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 Jan;25(1):94-113. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00456-0. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many trials, reviews, and meta-analyses have been performed on the comparison of short versus long antibiotic treatment in respiratory tract infections, generally supporting shorter treatment. The aim of this umbrella review is to assess the soundness of the current evidence base for optimal antibiotic treatment duration.

METHODS

A search in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection was performed on May 1, 2024, without date and language restrictions. Systematic reviews addressing treatment durations in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), acute sinusitis, and streptococcal pharyngitis, tonsillitis, or pharyngotonsillitis were included. Studies from inpatient and outpatient settings were included; reviews in paediatric populations were excluded. Outcomes of interest were clinical and bacteriological cure, microbiological eradication, mortality, relapse rate, and adverse events. The quality of the reviews was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool, risk of bias of all included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (version 1), and overall quality of evidence according to GRADE.

FINDINGS

We identified 30 systematic reviews meeting the criteria; they were generally of a low to critically low quality. 21 reviews conducted a meta-analysis. For CAP outside the intensive care unit (ICU; 14 reviews, of which eight did a meta-analysis) and AECOPD (eight reviews, of which five did a meta-analysis), there was sufficient evidence supporting a treatment duration of 5 days; evidence for shorter durations is scarce. Evidence on non-ventilator-associated HAP is absent, despite identifying three reviews (of which one did a meta-analysis), since no trials were conducted exclusively in this population. For sinusitis the evidence appears to support a shorter regimen, but more evidence is needed in the population who actually require antibiotic treatment. For pharyngotonsillitis (eight reviews, of which six did a meta-analysis), sufficient evidence exists to support short-course cephalosporin but not short-course penicillin when dosed three times a day.

INTERPRETATION

The available evidence for non-ICU CAP and AECOPD supports a short-course treatment duration of 5 days in patients who have clinically improved. Efforts of the scientific community should be directed at implementing this evidence in daily practice. High-quality RCTs are needed to underpin even shorter treatment durations for CAP and AECOPD, to establish the optimal treatment duration of HAP and acute sinusitis, and to evaluate shorter duration using an optimal penicillin dosing schedule in patients with pharyngotonsillitis.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

针对呼吸道感染中短期与长期抗生素治疗的比较,已经开展了许多试验、综述和荟萃分析,总体上支持较短疗程的治疗。本伞状综述的目的是评估当前关于最佳抗生素治疗疗程的证据基础的可靠性。

方法

于2024年5月1日在Ovid MEDLINE、Embase和科睿唯安科学网核心合集进行检索,无日期和语言限制。纳入了针对社区获得性肺炎(CAP)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)、医院获得性肺炎(HAP)、急性鼻窦炎以及链球菌性咽炎、扁桃体炎或咽扁桃体炎治疗疗程的系统综述。纳入了来自住院和门诊环境的研究;排除了儿科人群的综述。感兴趣的结局包括临床和细菌学治愈、微生物清除、死亡率、复发率和不良事件。使用AMSTAR 2工具评估综述的质量,使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(第1版)评估所有纳入的随机对照试验(RCT)的偏倚风险,并根据GRADE评估总体证据质量。

结果

我们确定了30篇符合标准的系统综述;它们的质量普遍较低至极低。21篇综述进行了荟萃分析。对于重症监护病房(ICU)以外的CAP(14篇综述,其中8篇进行了荟萃分析)和AECOPD(8篇综述,其中5篇进行了荟萃分析),有充分证据支持5天的治疗疗程;疗程更短的证据很少。尽管确定了3篇综述(其中1篇进行了荟萃分析),但由于没有专门针对该人群进行的试验,因此缺乏关于非呼吸机相关性HAP的证据。对于鼻窦炎,证据似乎支持较短的治疗方案,但在实际需要抗生素治疗的人群中还需要更多证据。对于咽扁桃体炎(8篇综述,其中6篇进行了荟萃分析),有充分证据支持短疗程头孢菌素治疗,但每天给药3次时,短疗程青霉素治疗则缺乏充分证据。

解读

对于非ICU的CAP和AECOPD,现有证据支持对临床症状已改善的患者采用5天的短疗程治疗。科学界应致力于在日常实践中应用这一证据。需要高质量的RCT来支持对CAP和AECOPD采用更短的治疗疗程,确定HAP和急性鼻窦炎的最佳治疗疗程,并评估在咽扁桃体炎患者中使用最佳青霉素给药方案的更短疗程。

资金来源

无。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验