Emergency and Critical Care Center, Intensive Care Unit, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.
The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Hangzhou, Hangzhou, 310053, Zhejiang, China.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Sep 7;24(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02710-7.
Postoperative time to extubation plays a role in prognosis after heart valve surgery; however, its exact impact has not been clarified. This study compared the postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery and conventional sternotomy, focusing on early extubation and factors influencing prolonged mechanical ventilation.
Data from 744 patients who underwent heart valve surgery at the Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital between August 2019 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The outcomes in patients who underwent conventional median sternotomy (MS) and minimally invasive (MI) video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Kaplan-Meier curves. Clinical data, including surgical data, postoperative cardiac function, postoperative complications, and intensive care monitoring data, were analyzed.
After propensity score matching and IPTW, 196 cases of conventional MS were compared with 196 cases of MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Compared to patients in the conventional MS group, those in the MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group in the matched cohort had a higher early postoperative extubation rate (P < 0.01), reduced incidence of postoperative pleural effusion (P < 0.05), significantly shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit (P < 0.01), shorter overall length of hospital stay (P < 0.01), and lower total cost of hospitalization (P < 0.01).
Successful early tracheal extubation is important for the intensive care management of patients after heart valve surgery. The advantages of MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery over conventional MS include significant reductions in the duration of use of mechanical ventilation support, reduced length of intensive care unit stay, reduced total length of hospitalization, and a favorable patient recovery rate.
心脏瓣膜手术后的拔管时间对预后有一定影响,但具体影响尚未明确。本研究比较了微创与传统正中开胸手术的术后结果,重点关注早期拔管和影响机械通气延长的因素。
回顾性分析 2019 年 8 月至 2022 年 6 月在浙江省人民医院行心脏瓣膜手术的 744 例患者的资料。采用倾向性评分匹配和逆概率处理加权法(IPTW)及 Kaplan-Meier 曲线比较传统正中开胸(MS)和微创(MI)电视胸腔镜手术患者的术后结果。分析临床资料,包括手术数据、术后心功能、术后并发症及重症监护监测数据。
经倾向性评分匹配和 IPTW 后,196 例传统 MS 与 196 例 MI 电视胸腔镜手术进行比较。与传统 MS 组相比,匹配队列中 MI 电视胸腔镜手术组的早期术后拔管率更高(P<0.01),术后胸腔积液发生率更低(P<0.05),重症监护室停留时间更短(P<0.01),总住院时间更短(P<0.01),住院总费用更低(P<0.01)。
心脏瓣膜手术后成功早期拔管对重症监护管理至关重要。MI 电视胸腔镜手术优于传统 MS 的优势在于显著减少机械通气支持的使用时间、缩短重症监护室停留时间、缩短总住院时间和提高患者康复率。