• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Disclosing the fates of rejected papers: A possible measure to enhance review ability.

作者信息

Matsubara Shigeki, Matsubara Daisuke

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koga Red Cross Hospital, Koga, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Feb;168(2):840-842. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15902. Epub 2024 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15902
PMID:39244706
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Disclosing the fates of rejected papers: A possible measure to enhance review ability.披露被拒稿件的去向：提高审稿能力的一项可行措施。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Feb;168(2):840-842. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15902. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
2
Do peer reviewers comment on reporting items as instructed by the journal? A secondary analysis of two randomized trials.同行评审员是否按照期刊的要求对报告项目进行评论？两项随机试验的二次分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May 8;183:111818. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111818.
3
Effect of Monetary Incentives on Peer Review Acceptance and Completion: A Quasi-Randomized Interventional Trial.金钱激励对同行评审接受率和完成率的影响：一项准随机干预试验。
Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun 1;53(6):e1181-e1189. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006637. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
4
Artificial intelligence as author: Can scientific reviewers recognize GPT-4o-generated manuscripts?人工智能作为作者：科学评审人员能识别由GPT-4o生成的稿件吗？
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 30;97:216-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.07.034.
5
Disclosing to parents newborn carrier status identified by routine blood spot screening.向父母披露通过常规血斑筛查确定的新生儿携带者状态。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD003859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003859.pub2.
6
Assessment of whether use of a professional medical writer is associated with time to publication of papers reporting phase III oncology clinical trials in two high-impact general medicine journals.评估在两家高影响力的普通医学期刊上，使用专业医学撰写人员是否与报告肿瘤学III期临床试验的论文发表时间相关。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2025 May;41(5):887-893. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2025.2505697. Epub 2025 May 23.
7
Silver alloy vs. uncoated urinary catheters: a systematic review of the literature.银合金与未涂层导尿管的比较：文献系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Aug;20(15-16):2098-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03561.x. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
8
How do authors' perceptions of their papers compare with co-authors' perceptions and peer-review decisions?作者对其论文的看法与合著者的看法和同行评审决定相比如何？
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 10;19(4):e0300710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300710. eCollection 2024.
9
Development and evaluation of a survey instrument to assess veterinary medical record suitability for multi-center research studies.一种用于评估兽医学记录对多中心研究适用性的调查工具的开发与评估。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Aug 5;9:941036. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.941036. eCollection 2022.
10
Effects of Experimental Interventions to Improve the Biomedical Peer-Review Process: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.实验干预措施对改善生物医学同行评审过程的影响：系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e019903. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019903. Epub 2021 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Letter to the Editor: The Fate of Individual Tone in the Age of AI Writing.致编辑的信：人工智能写作时代中个体风格的命运
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;32(4):2419-2420. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16678-8. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
ChatGPT use in daily obstetrics and gynecology practice: clarification and recommendations.ChatGPT在日常妇产科实践中的应用：说明与建议。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Oct;310(4):2295-2296. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07717-6. Epub 2024 Aug 30.