Department of Epileptology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neural Dynamics and Magnetoencephalography, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; MEG-Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Epileptology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neural Dynamics and Magnetoencephalography, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; MEG-Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
J Neurol Sci. 2024 Nov 15;466:123213. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.123213. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
Myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated antibodies (MAAs) are assessed in clinical neurology, serving as a non-invasive tool for the differential diagnosis of autoimmune myopathies. However, the presence of MSAs and MAAs in neurological disorders remains uncertain.
Retrospective analysis was conducted on 878 serum samples from the neurological laboratory of the University Hospital Tübingen, Germany. The EUROLINE Myositis Profil 3 (IgG) Line Blot was used for antibody evaluation (anti-Mi2, -Ku, -PM-Scl100, -PM-Scl75, -Jo1, -SRP, -PL7, -PL12, -EJ, -OJ, and -Ro52). Samples were categorized into 19 disease groups, with consideration for myositis-linked and non-myositis-linked diseases. Then, the distribution of positive findings and the concurrent presence of more than one MAA/MSA were analyzed.
Among 727 included line blots, 84 could be assigned to myositis-linked diseases (thereof 44 positive for MAA/MSA). MAA and MSA taken together were more frequently positive for the main group of myositis-linked disease (52.4 %) compared to the non-myositis-linked group (14.6 %, overall specificity 85.4 %). However, individual antibodies were specific, ranging above 97.5 %. False positive antibody results can also occur in neurological differential diagnoses such as muscle dystrophy or cramp fasciculation syndrome. Furthermore, the concurrent presence of more than one MAA/MSA does not show a significant association with the presence of a myositis-linked disease for antibody-positive samples (p = 0.136).
Testing MSA and MAA simultaneously may not be suitable as a primary screening method for myositis-linked diseases in clinical neurological groups. However, MSAs and MAAs may offer valuable diagnostic support, particularly in cases where myositis is strongly considered.
肌炎特异性抗体(MSA)和肌炎相关抗体(MAA)在临床神经病学中进行评估,作为自身免疫性肌病鉴别诊断的一种非侵入性工具。然而,神经系统疾病中存在 MSA 和 MAA 的情况仍不确定。
对德国图宾根大学医院神经科实验室的 878 份血清样本进行回顾性分析。使用 EUROLINE 肌炎谱 3(IgG)线印迹进行抗体评估(抗 Mi2、-Ku、-PM-Scl100、-PM-Scl75、-Jo1、-SRP、-PL7、-PL12、-EJ、-OJ 和 -Ro52)。根据与肌炎相关和非肌炎相关疾病,将样本分为 19 种疾病组。然后分析阳性发现的分布情况以及同时存在多种 MAA/MSA 的情况。
在 727 份纳入的线印迹中,84 份可归为与肌炎相关的疾病(其中 44 份 MAA/MSA 阳性)。与非肌炎相关组(总体特异性 85.4%)相比,MAA 和 MSA 联合使用时,肌炎相关疾病的主要组更常呈阳性(52.4%)。然而,个别抗体具有高度特异性,均高于 97.5%。在神经学鉴别诊断中,如肌肉营养不良或痉挛性抽搐综合征,也可能出现假阳性抗体结果。此外,对于抗体阳性样本,同时存在多种 MAA/MSA 与肌炎相关疾病的存在并不相关(p=0.136)。
在临床神经科群体中,同时检测 MSA 和 MAA 可能不适合作为肌炎相关疾病的初步筛查方法。然而,MSA 和 MAA 可能提供有价值的诊断支持,特别是在强烈考虑肌炎的情况下。