von Schrottenberg Victoria, Kerber André, Sterner Philipp, Teusen Clara, Beigel Pauline, Linde Klaus, Henningsen Peter, Herpertz Sabine C, Gensichen Jochen, Schneider Antonius
Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Psychopathology. 2025;58(1):1-12. doi: 10.1159/000540161. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
According to ICD-11, personality disorders (PDs) are defined by the severity of self and interpersonal dysfunction in terms of personality functioning (PF) and an optional assessment of specific maladaptive personality trait expressions. Also, somatoform disorders are replaced by somatic symptom disorder (SSD). This study examines associations using the novel diagnostic criteria of SSD in an unselected primary care sample, PF, and maladaptive traits in patients with and without SSD.
An anonymized cross-sectional study was conducted. A questionnaire including SSD-12 (Somatic Symptom Disorder B Criteria Scale-12) and PHQ-15 (Patient Health Questionnaire-15), LPFS-BF 2.0 (Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form) and PID-5BF+M (Modified Personality Inventory for DSM-5 - Brief Form Plus) was used. A bifactor (S-1) model was calculated with PF (reference for general factor) and personality traits (specific factors) to estimate associations between PF, specific maladaptive personality traits, and SSD. Differences in personality scales between SSD and non-SSD patients were calculated with the Mann-Whitney U test.
A total of 624 patients in six general practices participated (mean age 47 years; 60.4% female). SSD-12 and PHQ-15, respectively, showed significant associations with PF (γ = 0.51; γ = 0.48; p < 0.001), negative affectivity (γ = 0.50; γ = 0.38, p < 0.001) and psychoticism (γ = 0.29; γ = 0.28; p < 0.010). Besides, SSD-12 was significantly associated with disinhibition (γ = -0.38; p < 0.010) and anankastia (γ = -0.16; p < 0.010). Patients with SSD showed significantly impaired PF and maladaptive traits in all scales (p < 0.001).
Impaired PF explains moderate to large amounts of the SSD symptoms and maladaptive personality traits negative affectivity, psychoticism, disinhibition, and anankastia show specific associations beyond PF. An in-depth understanding of these relations might be helpful to improve doctor-patient communication and treatment in SSD.
根据《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11),人格障碍(PDs)是根据人格功能(PF)方面自我和人际功能障碍的严重程度以及对特定适应不良人格特质表现的可选评估来定义的。此外,躯体形式障碍已被躯体症状障碍(SSD)所取代。本研究在一个未经选择的初级保健样本中,使用SSD的新诊断标准,研究SSD患者与非SSD患者的PF及适应不良特质之间的关联。
进行了一项匿名横断面研究。使用了一份问卷,包括SSD - 12(躯体症状障碍B类标准量表 - 12)、PHQ - 15(患者健康问卷 - 15)、LPFS - BF 2.0(人格功能水平量表 - 简表)和PID - 5BF + M(修订版DSM - 5人格问卷 - 简表加)。计算了一个双因素(S - 1)模型,其中PF(作为一般因素的参照)和人格特质(特定因素)用于估计PF、特定适应不良人格特质与SSD之间的关联。使用曼 - 惠特尼U检验计算SSD患者与非SSD患者在人格量表上的差异。
共有来自六个普通诊所的624名患者参与(平均年龄47岁;女性占60.4%)。SSD - 12和PHQ - 15分别与PF(γ = 0.51;γ = 0.48;p < 0.001)、消极情感性(γ = 0.50;γ = 0.38,p < 0.001)和精神病性(γ = 0.29;γ = 0.28;p < 0.010)显示出显著关联。此外,SSD - 12与抑制不足(γ = -0.38;p < 0.010)和强迫性(γ = -0.16;p < 0.010)显著相关。SSD患者在所有量表上的PF和适应不良特质均显著受损(p < 0.001)。
受损的PF解释了SSD症状的中到大量部分,适应不良人格特质消极情感性、精神病性、抑制不足和强迫性在PF之外显示出特定关联。深入理解这些关系可能有助于改善SSD中的医患沟通和治疗。