Duke Clinical Research Institute; Department of Medicine.
Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Nov 15;231:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.09.006. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
The role of lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) in the development of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and high-risk plaque (HRP) in primary prevention patients with stable chest pain is unknown. We sought to evaluate the relation of Lp(a), independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), with the presence of obstructive CAD and HRP to improve understanding of the residual risk imparted by Lp(a) on CAD. We performed a secondary analysis in Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) Trial participants who had coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) performed and Lp(a) data available. Lp(a) concentration was analyzed as a binary variable, with elevated Lp(a) defined as ≥50 mg/100 ml. "Stenosis ≥50%" was defined as ≥50% coronary artery stenosis in any epicardial vessel, and "stenosis ≥70%" was defined as ≥70% coronary artery stenosis in any epicardial vessel and/or ≥50% left main coronary artery stenosis. HRP was defined as presence of plaque on CTA imaging with evidence of positive remodeling, low computed tomography attenuation, or napkin-ring sign. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the association between Lp(a) and the outcomes of obstructive CAD and HRP stratified by LDL-C ≥100 versus <100 mg/100 ml. Of the 1,815 patients who underwent CTA and had Lp(a) data available, those with elevated Lp(a) were more commonly women and Black than those with lower Lp(a). Elevated Lp(a) was associated with stenosis ≥50% (odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 2.15, p = 0.005) and stenosis ≥70% (odds ratio 2.05, 95% confidence interval 1.34 to 3.11, p = 0.0008) in the multivariate models, and this relation was not modified by LDL-C ≥100 versus <100 mg/100 ml (interaction p >0.4). Elevated Lp(a) was not associated with HRP when adjusted for obstructive CAD. This study of patients without known CAD found that elevated Lp(a) ≥50 mg/100 ml was independently associated with the presence of obstructive CAD regardless of controlled versus uncontrolled LDL-C but was not independently associated with HRP when stenosis ≥50% or ≥70% was accounted for. Further research is warranted to delineate the role of Lp(a) in the residual risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease that patients may have despite optimal LDL-C lowering.
脂蛋白(a)(Lp[a])在稳定型胸痛的原发性预防患者中阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)和高危斑块(HRP)的发展中的作用尚不清楚。我们旨在评估 Lp(a)与阻塞性 CAD 和 HRP 的存在之间的关系,独立于低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C),以更好地了解 Lp(a)对 CAD 带来的剩余风险。我们对进行了前瞻性多中心成像研究以评估胸痛(PROMISE)试验的参与者进行了冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)检查和 Lp(a)数据的二次分析。将 Lp(a)浓度分析为二分类变量,升高的 Lp(a)定义为≥50mg/100ml。“狭窄≥50%”定义为任何心外膜血管的≥50%冠状动脉狭窄,“狭窄≥70%”定义为任何心外膜血管和/或≥50%左主干冠状动脉狭窄的≥70%冠状动脉狭窄。HRP 定义为 CTA 成像存在斑块,并伴有正性重构、计算机断层扫描衰减低或餐巾环征。构建多变量逻辑回归模型,以评估 LDL-C≥100 与<100mg/100ml 分层时 Lp(a)与阻塞性 CAD 和 HRP 结局之间的关联。在接受 CTA 检查并可获得 Lp(a)数据的 1815 名患者中,Lp(a)升高的患者比 Lp(a)较低的患者更常见为女性和黑人。在多变量模型中,升高的 Lp(a)与狭窄≥50%(比值比 1.57,95%置信区间 1.14 至 2.15,p=0.005)和狭窄≥70%(比值比 2.05,95%置信区间 1.34 至 3.11,p=0.0008)相关,而这种关系不受 LDL-C≥100 与<100mg/100ml 分层的影响(交互作用 p>0.4)。在调整了阻塞性 CAD 后,升高的 Lp(a)与 HRP 无关。这项针对无已知 CAD 患者的研究发现,升高的 Lp(a)≥50mg/100ml 与阻塞性 CAD 的存在独立相关,无论 LDL-C 是否得到控制,但在考虑狭窄≥50%或≥70%时,与 HRP 无关。需要进一步研究以阐明 Lp(a)在尽管 LDL-C 降低最佳但患者仍存在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病残余风险中的作用。