Magnet Ingrid, Stommel Alexandra-Maria, Schriefl Christoph, Mueller Matthias, Poppe Michael, Grafeneder Juergen, Testori Christoph, Janata Andreas, Schober Andreas, Grassmann Daniel, Behringer Wilhelm, Weihs Wolfgang, Holzer Michael, Hoegler Sandra, Ettl Florian
Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Cardiology, Klinik Floridsdorf, Vienna, Austria.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2025 Mar;45(3):476-485. doi: 10.1177/0271678X241281485. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) facilitates resuscitation with immediate and precise temperature control. This study aimed to determine the optimal reperfusion temperature to minimize neurological damage after ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest (VFCA). Twenty-four rats were randomized (n = 8 per group) to normothermia (NT = 37°C), mild hypothermia (MH = 33°C) or moderate hypothermia (MOD = 27°C). The rats were subjected to 10 minutes of VFCA, before 15 minutes of ECPR at their respective target temperature. After ECPR weaning, rats in the MOD group were rapidly rewarmed to 33°C, and temperature maintained at 33°C (MH/MOD) or 37°C (NT) for 12 hours before slow rewarming to normothermia (MH/MOD). The primary outcome was 30-day survival with overall performance category (OPC) 1 or 2 (1 = normal, 2 = slight disability, 3 = severe disability, 4 = comatose, 5 = dead). Secondary outcomes included awakening rate (OPC ≤ 3) and neurological deficit score (NDS, from 0 = normal to 100 = brain dead). The survival rate did not differ between reperfusion temperatures (NT = 25%, MH = 63%, MOD = 38%, p = 0.301). MH had the lowest NDS (NT = 4[IQR 3-4], MH = 2[1-2], MOD = 5[3-5], p = 0.044) and highest awakening rate (NT = 25%, MH = 88%, MOD = 75%, p = 0.024). In conclusion, ECPR with 33°C reperfusion did not statistically significantly improve survival after VFCA when compared with 37°C or 27°C reperfusion but was neuroprotective as measured by awakening rate and neurological function.
体外心肺复苏(ECPR)有助于进行复苏,并能实现即时且精确的温度控制。本研究旨在确定在心室颤动心脏骤停(VFCA)后使神经损伤最小化的最佳再灌注温度。将24只大鼠随机分组(每组n = 8只),分别置于正常体温组(NT = 37°C)、轻度低温组(MH = 33°C)或中度低温组(MOD = 27°C)。大鼠先经历10分钟的VFCA,然后在各自的目标温度下进行15分钟的ECPR。在ECPR撤机后,MOD组的大鼠迅速复温至33°C,并在缓慢复温至正常体温(MH/MOD)之前,将温度维持在33°C(MH/MOD)或37°C(NT)12小时。主要结局指标是30天生存率及总体表现类别(OPC)为1或2(1 = 正常,2 = 轻度残疾,3 = 重度残疾,4 = 昏迷,5 = 死亡)。次要结局指标包括苏醒率(OPC≤3)和神经功能缺损评分(NDS,从0 = 正常到100 = 脑死亡)。不同再灌注温度下的生存率无差异(NT = 25%,MH = 63%,MOD = 38%,p = 0.301)。MH组的NDS最低(NT = 4[四分位间距3 - 4],MH = 2[1 - 2],MOD = 5[3 - 5],p = 0.044),苏醒率最高(NT = 25%,MH = 88%,MOD = 75%,p = 0.024)。总之,与37°C或27°C再灌注相比,33°C再灌注的ECPR在VFCA后并未在统计学上显著提高生存率,但从苏醒率和神经功能方面衡量具有神经保护作用。