• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A prospective, randomized, controlled, interventional clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the medical monopoint reperfusion system for aspiration thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients (SUMMIT MAX): Trial rationale and design.一项评估急性缺血性卒中患者使用单点位再灌注系统进行抽吸血栓切除术安全性和有效性的前瞻性、随机、对照、干预性临床试验(SUMMIT MAX):试验原理与设计
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 9:15910199241270711. doi: 10.1177/15910199241270711.
2
AXS Vecta 0.071-0.074 Inch Aspiration Catheters for Mechanical Thrombectomy: Case Series and Literature Review.用于机械取栓的AXS Vecta 0.071 - 0.074英寸抽吸导管:病例系列及文献综述
Neurointervention. 2023 Mar;18(1):47-57. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2022.00283. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
3
A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Group Target-Value Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Large Bore Aspiration Catheter System for the Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.一项前瞻性、多中心、单组目标值临床试验,以评估大口径抽吸导管系统用于急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗的安全性和有效性。
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 9;13:864563. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.864563. eCollection 2022.
4
Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2C/Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 3 Reperfusion Should Be the Aim of Mechanical Thrombectomy: Insights From the ASTER Trial (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization).改良溶栓治疗脑梗死 2C/脑梗死 3 再灌注应是机械取栓的目标:来自 ASTER 试验(接触抽吸与支架取栓治疗成功再通的比较)的见解。
Stroke. 2018 May;49(5):1189-1196. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020700. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
5
Combined use of contact aspiration and the stent retriever technique versus stent retriever alone for recanalization in acute cerebral infarction: the randomized ASTER 2 study protocol.接触抽吸与支架取栓术联合应用与单纯支架取栓术治疗急性脑梗死再通的随机对照 ASTER 2 研究方案。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 May;12(5):471-476. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014735. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
SOFIA Aspiration System as first-line Technique (SOFAST): a prospective, multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of the 6 French SOFIA Flow Plus aspiration catheter for endovascular stroke thrombectomy.SOFIA抽吸系统作为一线技术(SOFAST):一项前瞻性、多中心研究,旨在评估6F SOFIA Flow Plus抽吸导管用于血管内卒中血栓切除术的有效性和安全性。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Jun 16;17(7):753-758. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-021811.
7
Prospective evaluation to characterize the real-world performance of the EMBOVAC aspiration catheter for neurothrombectomy: a post-market clinical follow-up trial.用于神经血栓切除术的EMBOVAC抽吸导管真实世界性能特征的前瞻性评估:一项上市后临床随访试验。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Feb 14;17(3):254-260. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-021407.
8
First-line use of contact aspiration for thrombectomy versus a stent retriever for recanalization in acute cerebral infarction: The randomized ASTER study protocol.直接接触抽吸血栓切除术与支架取栓术用于急性脑梗死再通的一线治疗:随机 ASTER 研究方案。
Int J Stroke. 2018 Jan;13(1):87-95. doi: 10.1177/1747493017711948. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
9
Thrombectomy aspiration post-market study in acute stroke with the Q aspiration catheter: the TAPAS study.取栓抽吸术在后市场研究急性脑卒中与 Q 抽吸导管:TAPAS 研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Jul;15(7):674-678. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018649. Epub 2022 May 31.
10
Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With M2 Occlusion in the ASTER Randomized Trial (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization).在 ASTER 随机试验(接触抽吸与支架取栓治疗成功再通的比较)中,急性缺血性脑卒中 M2 闭塞患者的接触抽吸与支架取栓的比较。
Stroke. 2018 Feb;49(2):461-464. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019598. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Trial of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Strokes.大型缺血性卒中血管内血栓切除术试验
N Engl J Med. 2023 Apr 6;388(14):1259-1271. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2214403. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
2
Trial of Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Infarct.大面积梗死急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗试验
N Engl J Med. 2023 Apr 6;388(14):1272-1283. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2213379. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
3
AXS Vecta 0.071-0.074 Inch Aspiration Catheters for Mechanical Thrombectomy: Case Series and Literature Review.用于机械取栓的AXS Vecta 0.071 - 0.074英寸抽吸导管:病例系列及文献综述
Neurointervention. 2023 Mar;18(1):47-57. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2022.00283. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
4
Reperfusion Without Functional Independence in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion.大血管闭塞性晚期卒中患者再灌注后无功能独立性。
Stroke. 2022 Dec;53(12):3594-3604. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039476. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
5
Super large-bore ingestion of clot (SLIC) leads to high first pass effect in thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion.超大口径取栓(SLIC)导致大动脉闭塞取栓中的高首次通过效应。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Jul;15(7):664-668. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018806. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
Aspiration thrombectomy using a novel 088 catheter and specialized delivery catheter.使用新型088导管和专用输送导管进行抽吸血栓切除术。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):1239-1243. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018318. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
7
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990—2019年全球、区域和国家的卒中负担及其风险因素:全球疾病负担研究2019的系统分析
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
8
Epidemiology, Natural History, and Clinical Presentation of Large Vessel Ischemic Stroke.大血管缺血性卒中的流行病学、自然史和临床特征。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Jul 1;85(suppl_1):S4-S8. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz042.
9
Initial Experience in Direct Aspiration Thrombectomy Using a Novel 0.071-Inch Aspiration Catheter.使用新型 0.071 英寸抽吸导管直接抽吸血栓形成术的初步经验。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:272-275. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.055. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
10
Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial.抽吸血栓切除术与支架取栓术作为血管内治疗大动脉闭塞(COMPASS)的一线治疗方法:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、盲法结局、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 9;393(10175):998-1008. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30297-1.

一项评估急性缺血性卒中患者使用单点位再灌注系统进行抽吸血栓切除术安全性和有效性的前瞻性、随机、对照、干预性临床试验(SUMMIT MAX):试验原理与设计

A prospective, randomized, controlled, interventional clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the medical monopoint reperfusion system for aspiration thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients (SUMMIT MAX): Trial rationale and design.

作者信息

Dabus Guilherme, Puri Ajit S, McGuinness Ben, Priest Ryan A, Rai Ansaar T, Gross Bradley A, Zaidat Osama O, Hanel Ricardo A, Shazam Hussain M, Shaikh Hamza A, English Joey D, Nguyen Thanh N

机构信息

Miami Neuroscience Institute and Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.

University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 9:15910199241270711. doi: 10.1177/15910199241270711.

DOI:10.1177/15910199241270711
PMID:39246132
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11571143/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment of large vessel occlusion (LVO) using mechanical thrombectomy with or without intravenous thrombolysis has demonstrated better outcomes compared to medical treatment alone. Large-bore aspiration catheters have been recently introduced. Their effectiveness and safety have not been demonstrated in a randomized trial. The SUMMIT MAX study is designed to address this question.

METHODS

SUMMIT MAX is a randomized controlled trial where the effectiveness and safety of the large-bore Monopoint Reperfusion system (Route 92 Medical, San Mateo, CA), will be compared to the currently largest available FDA-cleared aspiration thrombectomy device the AXS Vecta Aspiration system (Stryker Neurovascular, Fremont, CA). The study is a multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, interventional, open label clinical trial. The hypothesis is that the effectiveness measured by the recanalization rate (modified thrombolysis in cerebrovascular infarction - mTICI) and safety measured by symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate (sICH) of the medical monopoint reperfusion system is non-inferior to the AXS Vecta Aspiration system.

RESULTS

Up to 250 subjects are enrolled with at least 50% of subjects enrolled by US sites. The primary effectiveness endpoint is successful arterial revascularization defined as an mTICI score ≥ 2b after use of the assigned device adjudicated by an independent core lab. The primary safety endpoint is defined as sICH within 24 h (-8/+24) post-procedure. Secondary endpoints include successful arterial revascularization defined as a mTICI score ≥ 2b after use of the assigned device with or without adjunctive therapy; device-related serious adverse events; all asymptomatic hemorrhages; time from groin puncture to final angiogram; and rate of first pass effect defined as mTICI 2b after first pass with the assigned device stratified by age (≤85, ≥ 86).

CONCLUSION

SUMMIT MAX is a randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of a new large bore class of aspiration devices to the currently largest FDA-cleared aspiration device available.

摘要

背景

与单纯药物治疗相比,采用机械取栓联合或不联合静脉溶栓治疗大血管闭塞(LVO)已显示出更好的疗效。大口径抽吸导管最近已被引入。其有效性和安全性尚未在随机试验中得到证实。SUMMIT MAX研究旨在解决这一问题。

方法

SUMMIT MAX是一项随机对照试验,将大口径单点再灌注系统(Route 92 Medical,加利福尼亚州圣马特奥)的有效性和安全性与目前美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的最大的抽吸取栓装置AXS Vecta抽吸系统(Stryker Neurovascular,加利福尼亚州弗里蒙特)进行比较。该研究是一项多中心、前瞻性、随机、对照、干预性、开放标签的临床试验。假设是通过再通率(改良的脑血管梗死溶栓 - mTICI)衡量的医疗单点再灌注系统的有效性以及通过症状性颅内出血率(sICH)衡量的安全性不劣于AXS Vecta抽吸系统。

结果

招募了多达250名受试者,其中至少50%的受试者由美国的研究点招募。主要有效性终点是成功的动脉血管再通,定义为在使用指定装置后由独立核心实验室判定的mTICI评分≥2b。主要安全性终点定义为术后24小时内(-8/+24)发生的sICH。次要终点包括在使用指定装置联合或不联合辅助治疗后定义为mTICI评分≥2b的成功动脉血管再通;与装置相关的严重不良事件;所有无症状出血;从腹股沟穿刺到最终血管造影的时间;以及首次通过效应率,定义为使用指定装置首次通过后mTICI 2b,并按年龄分层(≤85岁,≥86岁)。

结论

SUMMIT MAX是一项随机对照试验,比较了一种新型大口径抽吸装置与目前FDA批准的最大抽吸装置的有效性和安全性。