Suppr超能文献

关节镜下肩袖修补术中的肌肉推进作为不可修复性肩袖撕裂的一种治疗选择

Muscle Advancement During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair as a Treatment Option for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.

作者信息

Oh Sang Yun, Kim Yong Tae, Lee Kyung Jae, Kim Sae Hoon

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Sep 4;12(9):23259671241266050. doi: 10.1177/23259671241266050. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears presents a surgical dilemma. However, supraspinatus muscle advancement (MA) could be used to convert irreparable to reparable tears without requiring a graft.

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of patients with an irreparable tear who underwent rotator cuff repair with MA with those with a reparable large to massive cuff tear who underwent rotator cuff repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We enrolled 62 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair for a large to massive tear between January 2020 and May 2022. Among them, 29 patients underwent an MA procedure due to an inability to repair despite releases (MA group), whereas the other 33 patients did not require the procedure (NMA group). At 1 year postoperatively, follow-up assessments including magnetic resonance imaging were performed to evaluate group outcomes.

RESULTS

Despite there being more revision surgery cases and a poorer potential for cuff healing in the MA group, the retear rates in the MA and NMA groups were similar (31.0% vs 21.2%, respectively; = .401), as were clinical outcomes, including the visual analog scale for pain (2.9 vs 1.9; = .076), University of California, Los Angeles (27.0 vs 29.1; = .185), Constant (70.1 vs 74.9; = .063), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (74.5 vs 81.8; = .168) scores. Postoperative muscle power during forward elevation was weaker in the MA group than in the NMA group (35.1 vs 45.8 N; = .052), but external rotation power was comparable (49.3 vs 59.0 N; = .121). Progress in fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus was not significantly different in the 2 groups ( = .43), although the MA group showed a nonsignificant decrease in supraspinatus atrophy ( = .092) due to the lateral shift produced by the procedure.

CONCLUSION

The MA procedure for irreparable tears produced outcomes comparable with reparable tears, offering a valuable perspective on the efficiency of the procedure. The comparable but relatively high retear rates emphasize the need for further studies to compare with other treatment options for irreparable tears.

摘要

背景

不可修复的肩袖撕裂的治疗存在手术难题。然而,冈上肌推进术(MA)可用于将不可修复的撕裂转变为可修复的撕裂,而无需使用移植物。

目的

比较接受MA肩袖修复的不可修复撕裂患者与接受可修复的大至巨大肩袖撕裂肩袖修复患者的疗效。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

我们纳入了2020年1月至2022年5月期间因大至巨大撕裂而接受肩袖修复的62例患者。其中,29例患者因松解后仍无法修复而接受了MA手术(MA组),而其他33例患者不需要该手术(非MA组)。术后1年,进行包括磁共振成像在内的随访评估以评估组间疗效。

结果

尽管MA组的翻修手术病例更多且肩袖愈合潜力较差,但MA组和非MA组的再撕裂率相似(分别为31.0%和21.2%;P = 0.401),临床疗效也相似,包括疼痛视觉模拟量表评分(2.9对1.9;P = 0.076)、加州大学洛杉矶分校评分(27.0对29.1;P = 0.185)、Constant评分(70.1对74.9;P = 0.063)以及美国肩肘外科医师协会评分(74.5对81.8;P = 0.168)。MA组前举时的术后肌肉力量比非MA组弱(35.1对45.8 N;P = 〈0.052〉),但外旋力量相当(49.3对59.0 N;P = 0.121)。两组冈上肌脂肪变性的进展无显著差异(P = 0.43),尽管MA组由于该手术导致的外侧移位,冈上肌萎缩有不显著的减轻(P =〈0.092〉)。

结论

针对不可修复撕裂的MA手术产生的疗效与可修复撕裂相当,为该手术的有效性提供了有价值的观点。相当但相对较高的再撕裂率强调需要进一步研究以与不可修复撕裂的其他治疗选择进行比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4042/11375638/559541987d55/10.1177_23259671241266050-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验