Suppr超能文献

关节镜下部分修复治疗巨大肩袖撕裂:有效吗?一项系统评价。

Arthroscopic partial repair for massive rotator cuff tears: does it work? A systematic review.

作者信息

Malahias Michael-Alexander, Kostretzis Lazaros, Chronopoulos Efstathios, Brilakis Emmanouil, Avramidis Grigorios, Antonogiannakis Emmanouil

机构信息

3rd Orthopaedic Department, Hygeia Hospital, Erythrou Stavrou 4, 151 23, Marousi, Athens, Greece.

HKF Zentrum, ATOS Klinik, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Sports Med Open. 2019 Apr 11;5(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40798-019-0186-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While arthroscopic complete repair of massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT) back to their anatomic footprint is preferential, there are cases where this type of repair is not applicable due to the contraction of the torn tendons. In such cases, a non-anatomic incomplete or partial repair can be performed. A number of clinical studies have investigated the clinical and functional outcomes of arthroscopic partial repair for irreparable MRCT. To our knowledge, no systematic review has been published yet to synthetically evaluate these results.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently conducted the search in a PRISMA-compliant systematic way using the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. These databases were queried with the terms "arthroscopy"[MeSH Terms] OR arthroscopic surgical procedure [Text Word (tw)] AND massive rotator cuff tears [tw] AND arthroscopic partial repair [tw].

RESULTS

From the 55 initial studies, we finally chose 11 clinical studies which were eligible to our inclusion-exclusion criteria. The mean modified methodology Coleman score was 58/100, whereas it ranged from 41/100 to 78/100. In total, 643 patients were included in this review. All postoperative mean clinical and functional subjective scores, as well as muscle strength of patients treated with arthroscopic partial repair, were found significantly improved, when compared with the respective mean preoperative values. The rate of structural failure of the partial repair, as it was estimated by postoperative imaging modalities, was 48.9%. The overall reoperations' rate was 2.9% regarding the patients who were treated with partial repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic partial repair might be a safe and effective alternative treatment for irreparable contracted MRCT, where a complete repair cannot be performed. The methodological quality of the relevant, available literature is low to moderate; therefore, further studies of higher quality are required to confirm these results.

摘要

背景

虽然关节镜下将巨大肩袖撕裂(MRCT)完全修复至其解剖足迹是首选方法,但在某些情况下,由于撕裂肌腱的挛缩,这种修复方式并不适用。在这种情况下,可以进行非解剖性不完全或部分修复。许多临床研究调查了关节镜下对不可修复的MRCT进行部分修复的临床和功能结果。据我们所知,尚未发表系统评价来综合评估这些结果。

方法

两名研究者以符合PRISMA的系统方式,独立使用MEDLINE/PubMed数据库和Cochrane系统评价数据库进行检索。在这些数据库中查询的关键词为“关节镜检查”[医学主题词(MeSH)]或关节镜手术操作[文本词(tw)]以及巨大肩袖撕裂[tw]和关节镜下部分修复[tw]。

结果

从55项初始研究中,我们最终选择了11项符合纳入排除标准的临床研究。改良方法科尔曼评分的平均值为58/100,范围为41/100至78/100。本评价共纳入643例患者。与各自术前平均值相比,发现所有接受关节镜下部分修复患者的术后平均临床和功能主观评分以及肌肉力量均有显著改善。通过术后影像学检查估计的部分修复结构失败率为48.9%。接受部分修复治疗的患者总体再次手术率为2.9%。

结论

对于无法进行完全修复的不可修复挛缩性MRCT,关节镜下部分修复可能是一种安全有效的替代治疗方法。相关现有文献的方法学质量为低到中等;因此,需要进一步开展更高质量的研究来证实这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21e3/6459454/f02389e891c0/40798_2019_186_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验