• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用可穿戴加速度计进行上肢双侧协同协调的时间定位。

Temporal localization of upper extremity bilateral synergistic coordination using wearable accelerometers.

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States of America.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2024 Sep 3;12:e17858. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17858. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.17858
PMID:39247546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11378761/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The human upper extremity is characterized by inherent motor abundance, allowing a diverse array of tasks with agility and adaptability. Upper extremity functional limitations are a common sequela to Stroke, resulting in pronounced motor and sensory impairments in the contralesional arm. While many therapeutic interventions focus on rehabilitating the weaker arm, it is increasingly evident that it is necessary to consider bimanual coordination and motor control.

METHODS

Participants were recruited to two groups differing in age (Group 1 ( = 10): 23.4 ± 2.9 years, Group 2 ( = 10): 55.9 ± 10.6 years) for an exploratory study on the use of accelerometry to quantify bilateral coordination. Three tasks featuring coordinated reaching were selected to investigate the acceleration of the upper arm, forearm, and hand during activities of daily living (ADLs). Subjects were equipped with acceleration and inclination sensors on each upper arm, each forearm, and each hand. Data was segmented in MATLAB to assess inter-limb and intra-limb coordination. Inter-limb coordination was indicated through dissimilarity indices and temporal locations of congruous movement between upper arm, forearm, or hand segments of the right and left limbs. Intra-limb coordination was likewise assessed between upper arm-forearm, upper arm-hand, and forearm-hand segment pairs of the dominant limb.

FINDINGS

Acceleration data revealed task-specific movement features during the three distinct tasks. Groups demonstrated diminished similarity as task complexity increased. Groups differed significantly in the hand segments during the buttoning task, with Group 1 showing no coordination in the hand segments during buttoning, and strong coordination in reaching each button with the upper arm and forearm guiding extension. Group 2's dissimilarity scores and percentages of similarity indicated longer periods of inter-limb coordination, particularly towards movement completion. Group 1's dissimilarity scores and percentages of similarity indicated longer periods of intra-limb coordination, particularly in the coordination of the upper arm and forearm segments.

INTERPRETATION

The Expanding Procrustes methodology can be applied to compute objective coordination scores using accessible and highly accurate wearable acceleration sensors. The findings of task duration, angular velocity, and peak roll angle are supported by previous studies finding older individuals to present with slower movements, reduced movement stability, and a reduction of laterality between the limbs. The theory of a shift towards ambidexterity with age is supported by the finding of greater inter-limb coordination in the group of subjects above the age of thirty-five. The group below the age of thirty was found to demonstrate longer periods of intra-limb coordination, with upper arm and forearm coordination emerging as a possible explanation for the demonstrated greater stability.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/cd9d2162d331/peerj-12-17858-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/8ebf02612549/peerj-12-17858-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/3120e7ed14b5/peerj-12-17858-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/455d93c47fc0/peerj-12-17858-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/e423bce905a6/peerj-12-17858-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/30e2e6cc0824/peerj-12-17858-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/90c8332dd536/peerj-12-17858-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/b5d30d90df81/peerj-12-17858-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/0b76afaed77b/peerj-12-17858-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/812d782698de/peerj-12-17858-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/3d9969f4320a/peerj-12-17858-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/729f091f968d/peerj-12-17858-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/ca427833496c/peerj-12-17858-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/a79c3ea24548/peerj-12-17858-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/dd08b6203e90/peerj-12-17858-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/b3e5b220ebad/peerj-12-17858-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/cd9d2162d331/peerj-12-17858-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/8ebf02612549/peerj-12-17858-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/3120e7ed14b5/peerj-12-17858-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/455d93c47fc0/peerj-12-17858-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/e423bce905a6/peerj-12-17858-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/30e2e6cc0824/peerj-12-17858-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/90c8332dd536/peerj-12-17858-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/b5d30d90df81/peerj-12-17858-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/0b76afaed77b/peerj-12-17858-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/812d782698de/peerj-12-17858-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/3d9969f4320a/peerj-12-17858-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/729f091f968d/peerj-12-17858-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/ca427833496c/peerj-12-17858-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/a79c3ea24548/peerj-12-17858-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/dd08b6203e90/peerj-12-17858-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/b3e5b220ebad/peerj-12-17858-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4727/11378761/cd9d2162d331/peerj-12-17858-g016.jpg
摘要

背景

人类上肢具有内在的运动丰富性,能够灵活适应各种任务。上肢功能受限是中风的常见后遗症,导致对侧手臂明显的运动和感觉障碍。虽然许多治疗干预措施都集中在康复较弱的手臂上,但越来越明显的是,有必要考虑双手协调和运动控制。

方法

为了进行一项关于使用加速度计来量化双手协调的探索性研究,我们招募了两组年龄不同的参与者(第 1 组(n=10):23.4±2.9 岁,第 2 组(n=10):55.9±10.6 岁)。选择了三个协调的上肢伸展任务,以研究日常生活活动(ADL)中上肢、前臂和手部的加速度。受试者在每个上臂、前臂和每个手上都配备了加速度和倾斜传感器。数据在 MATLAB 中进行了分段,以评估肢体间和肢体内的协调。肢体间协调通过上、下臂、前臂或手部节段之间相似性指数和运动时间来表示。对优势肢体的上臂-前臂、上臂-手部和前臂-手部节段对之间的肢体内协调进行了类似的评估。

结果

加速度数据揭示了三个不同任务中特定于任务的运动特征。随着任务复杂性的增加,组间的相似性降低。在扣纽扣任务中,两组的手部节段差异显著,第 1 组在扣纽扣时手部节段没有协调,而上臂和前臂引导伸展以达到每个纽扣的协调能力较强。第 2 组的不相似性得分和相似性百分比表明,上肢和前臂的协调时间较长,特别是在运动完成阶段。第 1 组的不相似性得分和相似性百分比表明,上肢和前臂节段的协调时间较长,特别是在协调时。

解释

可以使用可访问且高度准确的可穿戴加速度传感器,应用扩展 Procrustes 方法计算客观的协调得分。任务持续时间、角速度和峰值滚动角度的发现得到了先前研究的支持,这些研究发现老年人的动作较慢,运动稳定性降低,四肢之间的偏侧性降低。年龄增长导致向双手灵巧性转变的理论得到了支持,即 35 岁以上组的肢体间协调程度更高。年龄在 35 岁以下的组被发现具有更长的肢体内协调时间,而上臂和前臂的协调可能是表现出更高稳定性的原因。

相似文献

1
Temporal localization of upper extremity bilateral synergistic coordination using wearable accelerometers.使用可穿戴加速度计进行上肢双侧协同协调的时间定位。
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 3;12:e17858. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17858. eCollection 2024.
2
A novel upper-limb function measure derived from finger-worn sensor data collected in a free-living setting.一种源于在自由生活环境中采集的手指佩戴传感器数据的新型上肢功能测量方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 20;14(3):e0212484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212484. eCollection 2019.
3
Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.通过使用机器人外骨骼进行训练来改变健康受试者上肢关节间的协调性。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Jun 12;14(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0254-x.
4
Inter- and intra-limb coordination in arm tremor.手臂震颤中的肢体间与肢体内部协调
Exp Brain Res. 1996 Aug;110(3):455-64. doi: 10.1007/BF00229145.
5
Synergistic control of forearm based on accelerometer data and artificial neural networks.基于加速度计数据和人工神经网络的前臂协同控制
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2008 May;41(5):389-97. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2008005000019. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
6
Relative accuracy of time and frequency domain features to quantify upper extremity coordination.用于量化上肢协调性的时域和频域特征的相对准确性。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:4958-61. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319504.
7
The Development of Bimanual Coordination Across Toddlerhood.婴幼儿期双手协调性的发展。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Jun;84(2):7-147. doi: 10.1111/mono.12405.
8
Postural context alters the stability of bimanual coordination by modulating the crossed excitability of corticospinal pathways.姿势背景通过调节皮质脊髓通路的交叉兴奋性来改变双手协调的稳定性。
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Mar;97(3):2016-23. doi: 10.1152/jn.00868.2006. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
9
Goal conceptualization has distinct effects on spatial and temporal bimanual coordination after left- and right- hemisphere stroke.目标概念化对左、右半球卒中后空间和时间的双手协调有明显影响。
Hum Mov Sci. 2024 Apr;94:103196. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2024.103196. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
10
The variable relationship between arm and hand use: a rationale for using finger magnetometry to complement wrist accelerometry when measuring daily use of the upper extremity.手臂与手部使用之间的可变关系:在测量上肢日常使用情况时,使用手指磁力测定法补充手腕加速度测定法的基本原理。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:4087-90. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944522.

本文引用的文献

1
Age-related modifications of muscle synergies during daily-living tasks: A scoping review.年龄相关的日常生活任务中肌肉协同作用的变化:范围综述。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2024 Mar;113:106207. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106207. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
Upper extremity kinematics: development of a quantitative measure of impairment severity and dissimilarity after stroke.上肢运动学:脑卒中后损伤严重程度和相似性的定量测量方法的发展。
PeerJ. 2023 Dec 8;11:e16374. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16374. eCollection 2023.
3
Exercise repetition rate measured with simple sensors at home can be used to estimate Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer score after stroke.
在家中使用简单传感器测量的运动重复率可用于估计中风后的上肢Fugl-Meyer评分。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Jun 19;4:1181766. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1181766. eCollection 2023.
4
Aging reduces manual dexterity and force production asymmetries between the hands.衰老会降低手部之间的手动灵活性和力量产生的不对称性。
Laterality. 2023 Jul-Nov;28(4-6):239-253. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2023.2226890. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
5
Attempt to Make the Upper-Limb Item of Objective Fugl-Meyer Assessment Using 9-Axis Motion Sensors.尝试使用九轴运动传感器制作客观 Fugl-Meyer 上肢评估项目。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 30;23(11):5213. doi: 10.3390/s23115213.
6
Present and future of gait assessment in clinical practice: Towards the application of novel trends and technologies.临床实践中步态评估的现状与未来:迈向新趋势和技术的应用
Front Med Technol. 2022 Dec 16;4:901331. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.901331. eCollection 2022.
7
Bimanual motor impairments in older adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人的双手运动障碍:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
EXCLI J. 2022 Aug 16;21:1068-1083. doi: 10.17179/excli2022-5236. eCollection 2022.
8
Age-Related Modifications of Muscle Synergies and Their Temporal Activations for Overground Walking.与年龄相关的肌肉协同作用的变化及其在地面行走中的时程激活。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2022;30:2700-2709. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3206887. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
9
Development and Validation of a Novel Robot-Based Assessment of Upper Limb Sensory Processing in Chronic Stroke.一种基于新型机器人的慢性卒中上肢感觉处理评估方法的开发与验证
Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 29;12(8):1005. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081005.
10
Quantitatively assessing aging effects in rapid motor behaviours: a cross-sectional study.定量评估快速运动行为中的老化效应:一项横断面研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Jul 26;19(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01035-1.