Grilo Carlos M, Pittman Brian
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Dec;57(12):2475-2481. doi: 10.1002/eat.24288. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
To explore dietary-restraint as a mediator of binge eating and weight-loss outcomes within a randomized controlled trial comparing cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and behavioral weight loss (BWL) for binge-eating disorder (BED) with obesity.
Ninety participants were randomly assigned to CBT or BWL and assessed by evaluators blinded to conditions at pretreatment, throughout-, and post-treatment (6 months). Three dietary-restraint measures (Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire [EDE-Q]-Restraint, Three-Factor Flexible-Restraint and Rigid-Restraint) were administered at pretreatment and after 2 months of treatment. Regression models examined whether changes at 2-months in the restraint scales mediated the effects of treatment (CBT versus BWL) on binge eating and weight-loss outcomes at post-treatment.
CBT and BWL had similar binge-eating outcomes and similar changes in EDE-Q-restraint and flexible-restraint. BWL had greater 2-month increases in rigid-restraint and greater weight-loss at posttreatment than CBT, with results suggesting 2-month changes in rigid-restraint mediated the greater difference (>7 pounds) in weight-loss. The observed mediation effect of 2.92 suggests 39% of total treatment-effect on weight-loss was mediated through 2-month increases in rigid-restraint.
This secondary analysis within a trial comparing CBT and BWL for BED suggests early-change in rigid-restraint has a mediating effect of BWL on weight-loss. Findings indicate that BWL improves binge eating and challenge views that dietary-restraint might exacerbate binge eating in BED with obesity. Findings require confirmation using hypothesis-testing in future trials.
Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00537758 ("Treatment for Obesity and Binge Eating Disorder").
在一项随机对照试验中,探讨饮食限制作为暴饮暴食和减肥结果的中介因素,该试验比较了针对伴有肥胖症的暴饮暴食症(BED)的认知行为疗法(CBT)和行为减肥法(BWL)。
90名参与者被随机分配到CBT组或BWL组,并由对治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后(6个月)情况不知情的评估人员进行评估。在治疗前和治疗2个月后,采用了三种饮食限制测量方法(饮食失调检查问卷[EDE-Q]中的限制量表、三因素灵活限制量表和严格限制量表)。回归模型检验了限制量表在2个月时的变化是否介导了治疗(CBT与BWL)对治疗后暴饮暴食和减肥结果的影响。
CBT和BWL在暴饮暴食结果以及EDE-Q限制量表和灵活限制量表的变化方面相似。BWL在2个月时的严格限制增加幅度更大,且治疗后的体重减轻幅度比CBT更大,结果表明严格限制在2个月时的变化介导了体重减轻方面更大的差异(超过7磅)。观察到的2.92的中介效应表明,治疗对体重减轻的总效应中有39%是通过严格限制在2个月时的增加来介导的。
这项在比较CBT和BWL治疗BED的试验中的二次分析表明,严格限制的早期变化对BWL的减肥有中介作用。研究结果表明,BWL改善了暴饮暴食情况,并挑战了饮食限制可能会加剧伴有肥胖症的BED患者暴饮暴食的观点。研究结果需要在未来的试验中通过假设检验来证实。
Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT00537758(“肥胖症和暴饮暴食症的治疗”)