Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Center for Weight, Eating and Lifestyle Science (WELL Center), Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Sep;57(9):1854-1867. doi: 10.1002/eat.24234. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
Understanding the perspectives of behavioral weight loss (BWL) participants could inform whether, how, and for whom BWL should be offered.
All 126 participants in a clinical trial of BWL for adults with binge-eating disorder (BED) and overweight/obesity were contacted about a qualitative study. 45 participants, 11 of whom had dropped out of the parent study, completed qualitative interviews. The interview guide was developed using data from a survey of providers who offer Health at Every Size and other weight-neutral lifestyle interventions. Questions were phrased to invite even the most negative responses. Questions focused on participants' experiences of weight stigma during treatment, perceptions of BWL's calorie and WL goals, and opinions of BWL and weight-neutral interventions.
We identified four themes using thematic analysis: (1) BWL did not perpetuate weight stigma. (2) Calorie and WL goals did not exacerbate participants' binge eating. (3) Patients should have the right to pursue any treatment that aligns with their personal goals. (4) BWL can improve participants' overall health.
BWL participants with BED and overweight/obesity want others to have access to a program that can reduce both weight and binge eating. Participants emphasized that no treatment works for everyone, and they all agreed that BWL had not perpetuated weight stigma. Fewer than 20% of participants considered the program's calorie and WL goals to be harmful; most participants viewed those goals as achievable and helpful, and many asserted that their participation in BWL had improved their overall health.
We interviewed adults with binge-eating disorder and overweight/obesity who had participated in a behavioral weight loss (BWL) program. Our participants wanted others in their position to have access to BWL because it aims to reduce both weight and binge-eating frequency. Efforts should be made to provide patients, clinicians, and policymakers with the knowledge that supervised, evidence-based BWL is an effective and desired treatment choice for this population.
了解行为体重管理(BWL)参与者的观点,可以为我们提供有关是否、如何以及为谁提供 BWL 的信息。
联系了参与成人暴食障碍(BED)和超重/肥胖行为体重管理临床试验的 126 名参与者,以开展一项定性研究。其中 45 名参与者完成了定性访谈,其中 11 名参与者退出了原始研究。访谈指南是使用为提供健康与体型大小无关的生活方式干预和其他体重中立干预措施的提供者的调查数据开发的。问题的表述方式旨在邀请参与者对治疗期间的体重歧视经历、对 BWL 的热量和 WL 目标的看法以及对 BWL 和体重中立干预措施的看法作出最消极的反应。
使用主题分析方法,我们确定了四个主题:(1)BWL 没有加剧体重歧视。(2)热量和 WL 目标没有加剧参与者的暴食行为。(3)患者应该有权选择任何符合其个人目标的治疗方法。(4)BWL 可以改善参与者的整体健康状况。
患有 BED 和超重/肥胖的 BWL 参与者希望其他人能够获得一种既能减轻体重又能减少暴食的治疗方法。参与者强调,没有一种治疗方法适合所有人,他们都认为 BWL 没有加剧体重歧视。不到 20%的参与者认为该计划的热量和 WL 目标是有害的;大多数参与者认为这些目标是可以实现的,并且有帮助,许多人断言他们参与 BWL 改善了他们的整体健康状况。
我们采访了患有暴食障碍和超重/肥胖的成年人,他们参加了行为体重管理(BWL)计划。我们的参与者希望与他们处境相同的人能够获得 BWL,因为它旨在减轻体重和暴食发作的频率。应该向患者、临床医生和政策制定者提供知识,即经过监督的、基于证据的 BWL 是该人群有效的和期望的治疗选择。