• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者且无标准可调节危险因素的临床转归和冠状动脉病变特征。

Clinical outcomes and coronary artery lesion characteristics of young patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction and no standard modifiable risk factors.

机构信息

Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Department of Cardiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Oct;104(4):714-722. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31205. Epub 2024 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.31205
PMID:39248198
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, those with no standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking) have higher 30-day mortality than those with SMuRFs. Differences in coronary lesion characteristics remain unclear.

METHODS

Data from STEMI patients aged ≤60 years from the Asia Pacific Evaluation of Cardiovascular Therapies Network (Australia, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam) was retrospectively analysed. Exclusion criteria included incomplete SMuRF data, prior myocardial infarction, or prior coronary revascularisation. Lesion type was defined using the American College of Cardiology criteria. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as peri-procedural myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass surgery, cerebrovascular event, or mortality. Multiple logistic regressions were used.

RESULTS

Of 4404 patients, 767 (17.4%) were SMuRFless. SMuRFless patients were more frequently younger (median age 51 vs. 53 years; p < 0.001), female (22.6% vs. 15.5%; p < 0.001), thrombolysed (20.1% vs. 12.5%; p < 0.001), and in cardiogenic shock (11.2% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.020). SMuRFless patients had significantly higher in-hospital MACE (7.2% vs. 4.3%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-4.08; p = 0.008) but 1-year mortality was not significantly different (3.6% vs. 5.7%, aOR 0.58; 95% CI 0.06-6.12; p = 0.549). Compared with patients with SMuRFs (4918 lesions), the SMuRFless (940 lesions) had fewer type B2/C lesions (60.8% vs. 65.6%; p = 0.020) and fewer lesions ≥20 mm (51.1% vs. 57.1%; p = 0.002) but more procedural complications (5.1% vs. 2.7%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among young STEMI patients, the SMuRFless have shorter and less complex lesions, but worse procedural and short-term MACE outcomes.

摘要

背景

在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,无标准可修正风险因素(SMuRFs:高血压、糖尿病、高脂血症和吸烟)的患者 30 天死亡率高于有 SMuRFs 的患者。冠状动脉病变特征的差异仍不清楚。

方法

回顾性分析来自亚太心血管治疗评估网络(澳大利亚、中国香港、马来西亚、新加坡和越南)的年龄≤60 岁 STEMI 患者的数据。排除标准包括 SMuRF 数据不完整、既往心肌梗死或冠状动脉血运重建。病变类型采用美国心脏病学会标准定义。主要不良心血管事件(MACE)定义为围手术期心肌梗死、紧急冠状动脉旁路移植术、脑血管事件或死亡。采用多变量逻辑回归。

结果

在 4404 例患者中,767 例(17.4%)为 SMuRFless。SMuRFless 患者更年轻(中位数年龄 51 岁 vs. 53 岁;p<0.001)、女性(22.6% vs. 15.5%;p<0.001)、溶栓(20.1% vs. 12.5%;p<0.001)和心源性休克(11.2% vs. 8.6%;p=0.020)的发生率更高。SMuRFless 患者院内 MACE 发生率显著更高(7.2% vs. 4.3%;调整后的优势比 [aOR] 2.25;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.24-4.08;p=0.008),但 1 年死亡率无显著差异(3.6% vs. 5.7%,aOR 0.58;95%CI 0.06-6.12;p=0.549)。与有 SMuRFs 的患者(4918 个病变)相比,SMuRFless 的患者(940 个病变)B2/C 型病变更少(60.8% vs. 65.6%;p=0.020),病变长度≥20mm 的病变更少(51.1% vs. 57.1%;p=0.002),但手术并发症更多(5.1% vs. 2.7%;p<0.001)。

结论

在年轻的 STEMI 患者中,SMuRFless 患者的病变更短、更简单,但手术和短期 MACE 结局更差。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes and coronary artery lesion characteristics of young patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction and no standard modifiable risk factors.年轻 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者且无标准可调节危险因素的临床转归和冠状动脉病变特征。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Oct;104(4):714-722. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31205. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
2
Increasing proportion of ST elevation myocardial infarction patients with coronary atherosclerosis poorly explained by standard modifiable risk factors.越来越多的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的冠状动脉粥样硬化程度不能用标准的可改变的危险因素来很好地解释。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Nov;24(17):1824-1830. doi: 10.1177/2047487317720287. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
3
Trends and Outcomes of ST-Segment-Elevation MI in Hospitalized Patients Without Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors.无标准可调节心血管风险因素的住院 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的趋势和结局。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Sep;47(9):101271. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101271. Epub 2022 May 26.
4
Ethnic Disparities in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Outcomes and Processes of Care in Patients With and Without Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Nationwide Cohort Study.伴有和不伴有标准可改变心血管危险因素的患者在ST段抬高型心肌梗死结局及医疗过程中的种族差异:一项全国性队列研究
Angiology. 2024 Sep;75(8):742-753. doi: 10.1177/00033197231182555. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
Mortality in STEMI patients without standard modifiable risk factors: a sex-disaggregated analysis of SWEDEHEART registry data.非标准可调节风险因素的 STEMI 患者的死亡率:SWEDEHEART 注册研究数据的性别细分分析。
Lancet. 2021 Mar 20;397(10279):1085-1094. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00272-5. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
6
Correlation of Admission Heart Rate With Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Right Coronary Artery ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: HORIZONS-AMI (The Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) Trial.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的右冠状动脉ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者入院心率与血管造影及临床结局的相关性:HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死血管重建和支架置入的协调结局)试验
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 19;6(7):e006181. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006181.
7
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes of proximal versus nonproximal lesion location in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: The PROXIMITI study.比较直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的近端病变与非近端病变位置的短期临床结局:PROXIMITI 研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 1;93(1):32-40. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27665. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
8
Characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of female patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.无标准可调节心血管风险因素的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死女性患者的特征和住院结局。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Dec;49(12):102830. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102830. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
9
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者药物介入策略与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的倾向评分匹配分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003508.
10
Clinical outcomes following ST-elevation myocardial infarction secondary to stent thrombosis treated by percutaneous coronary intervention.支架血栓形成导致 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的临床结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 1;96(4):E406-E415. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28802. Epub 2020 Feb 22.