Author Affiliations: Iowa Methodist Medical Center, UnityPoint Health, Des Moines, IA (Mr Vazquez, Dr Calhoun, Ms Fuchsen, and Drs Capella, Vaudt, Sidwell, Smith, Pelaez); University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA (Mr Vazquez); and The Iowa Clinic, Des Moines, IA (Drs Capella, Dr Sidwell and Dr Pelaez).
J Trauma Nurs. 2024;31(5):242-248. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000808. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
Needle thoracostomy is a potentially life-saving intervention for tension pneumothorax but may be overused, potentially leading to unnecessary morbidity.
To review prehospital needle thoracostomy indications, effectiveness, and adverse outcomes.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on registry data for a United States Midwestern Level I trauma center for a 7.5-year period (January 2015 to May 2022). Included were patients who received prehospital needle thoracostomy and trauma activation before hospital arrival. The primary outcomes were correct indications and improvement in vital signs. Secondary outcomes were the need for chest tubes, correct needle placement, complications, and survival.
A total of n = 67 patients were reviewed, of which n = 63 (94%) received a prehospital thoracostomy. Of the 63 prehospital thoracostomies, 54 (86%) survived to arrival. Of these 54, 44 (n = 81%) had documented reduced/absent breath sounds, 15 (28%) hypotension, and 19 (35%) with difficulty breathing/ventilating. Only four patients met all three prehospital trauma life support criteria: hypotension, difficulty ventilating, and absent breath sounds. There were no significant changes in prehospital vitals before and after receiving needle thoracostomy. In patients receiving imaging (n = 54), there was evidence of 15 (28%) lung lacerations, 6 (11%) of which had a pneumothorax and 3 (5%) near misses of important structures. Review of needle catheters visible on computer tomography imaging found 11 outside the chest and 1 in the abdominal cavity.
The study presents evidence of potential needle thoracostomy overuse and morbidity. Adherence to specific guidelines for needle decompression is needed.
胸腔穿刺针对于张力性气胸是一种潜在的救生干预措施,但可能被过度使用,从而导致不必要的发病率。
审查院前胸腔穿刺针的适应证、效果和不良结果。
对美国中西部一级创伤中心的登记数据进行回顾性队列研究,时间跨度为 7.5 年(2015 年 1 月至 2022 年 5 月)。纳入标准为在到达医院前接受院前胸腔穿刺针和创伤激活的患者。主要结果是正确的适应证和生命体征的改善。次要结果是需要进行胸腔引流管、正确的针置放、并发症和存活率。
共纳入 n = 67 例患者,其中 n = 63(94%)例接受了院前胸腔穿刺术。在 63 例院前胸腔穿刺中,有 54 例(86%)存活至到达医院。在这 54 例中,44 例(n = 81%)有记录到呼吸音减弱/消失,15 例(28%)有低血压,19 例(35%)有呼吸困难/通气困难。只有 4 例患者同时满足院前创伤生命支持的三个标准:低血压、呼吸困难和呼吸音消失。在接受针穿刺术前后,院前生命体征没有明显变化。在接受影像学检查的患者中(n = 54),有 15 例(28%)肺裂伤,其中 6 例(11%)有气胸,3 例(5%)临近重要结构。对计算机断层扫描成像中可见的针导管进行复查,发现 11 例位于胸腔外,1 例位于腹腔内。
本研究提供了潜在的胸腔穿刺针过度使用和发病率的证据。需要遵守特定的针减压指南。