• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A柱盲区对驾驶员在路口车辆转弯时行人可见性的影响。

Effect of A-Pillar Blind Spots on a Driver's Pedestrian Visibility during Vehicle Turns at an Intersection.

作者信息

Matsui Yasuhiro, Oikawa Shoko

机构信息

National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan.

Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan.

出版信息

Stapp Car Crash J. 2024 Dec;68:14-30. doi: 10.4271/2024-22-0002. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

DOI:10.4271/2024-22-0002
PMID:39250776
Abstract

This study aims to elucidate the impact of A-pillar blind spots on drivers' visibility of pedestrians during left and right turns at an intersection. An experiment was conducted using a sedan and a truck, with a professional test driver participating. The driver was instructed to maintain sole focus on a designated pedestrian model from the moment it was first sighted during each drive. The experimental results revealed how the blind spots caused by A-pillars occur and clarified the relationship between the pedestrian visible trajectory distance and specific vehicle windows. The results indicated that the shortest trajectory distance over which a pedestrian remained visible in the sedan was 17.6 m for a far-side pedestrian model during a right turn, where visibility was exclusively through the windshield. For the truck, this distance was 20.9 m for a near-side pedestrian model during a left turn, with visibility through the windshield of 9.5 m (45.5% of 20.9 m) and through the passenger-side window of 11.4 m (54.5% of 20.9 m). Additionally, we quantified the trajectory distances where pedestrians became invisible when the driver's view was obstructed by A-pillars. The sedan exhibited the highest invisibility rate at 46.1% for a far-side pedestrian model during a right turn, followed by the truck at 17.8% for the same model. These findings will be instrumental in developing new driving support systems aimed at enhancing visibility in situations where pedestrians are obscured by A-pillars.

摘要

本研究旨在阐明A柱盲区对驾驶员在十字路口左右转弯时行人视野的影响。使用一辆轿车和一辆卡车进行了一项实验,有一名专业测试驾驶员参与。要求驾驶员在每次驾驶过程中从首次看到指定行人模型的那一刻起就只专注于该模型。实验结果揭示了A柱造成的盲区是如何出现的,并阐明了行人可见轨迹距离与特定车窗之间的关系。结果表明,轿车中右侧转弯时远侧行人模型在仅通过挡风玻璃可见的情况下,行人保持可见的最短轨迹距离为17.6米。对于卡车,左侧转弯时近侧行人模型的这一距离为20.9米,通过挡风玻璃可见的距离为9.5米(占20.9米的45.5%),通过乘客侧车窗可见的距离为11.4米(占20.9米的54.5%)。此外,我们对驾驶员视线被A柱遮挡时行人变得不可见的轨迹距离进行了量化。轿车中右侧转弯时远侧行人模型的不可见率最高,为46.1%,其次是同一模型的卡车,不可见率为17.8%。这些发现将有助于开发新的驾驶辅助系统,以提高在行人被A柱遮挡的情况下的视野。

相似文献

1
Effect of A-Pillar Blind Spots on a Driver's Pedestrian Visibility during Vehicle Turns at an Intersection.A柱盲区对驾驶员在路口车辆转弯时行人可见性的影响。
Stapp Car Crash J. 2024 Dec;68:14-30. doi: 10.4271/2024-22-0002. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Driving Behavior during Right-Turn Maneuvers at Intersections on Left-Hand Traffic Roads.左手交通道路交叉口右转操作时的驾驶行为。
Stapp Car Crash J. 2022 Nov;66:217-238. doi: 10.4271/2022-22-0008.
3
Driving Behavior during Left-Turn Maneuvers at Intersections on Left-Hand Traffic Roads.在左侧通行道路交叉口左转时的驾驶行为。
Stapp Car Crash J. 2024 Jun;67:180-201. doi: 10.4271/2023-22-0007. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
Effects of safety measures on driver's speed behavior at pedestrian crossings.安全措施对驾驶员在行人横道处的速度行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Oct;83:111-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
5
Investigating the safety influence path of right-turn configurations on vehicle-pedestrian conflict risk at signalized intersections.研究信号交叉口右转车道设置对车辆-行人冲突风险的安全影响路径。
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Mar;211:107910. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107910. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
6
Kinematic cues in driver-pedestrian communication to support safe road crossing.驾驶员-行人交流中的运动学提示以支持安全道路穿越。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Nov;192:107236. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107236. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
7
Analyzing fault and severity in pedestrian-motor vehicle accidents in China.分析中国行人-机动车事故中的故障和严重程度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
8
How do drivers overtake pedestrians? Evidence from field test and naturalistic driving data.驾驶员如何超越行人?来自现场测试和自然驾驶数据的证据。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 May;139:105494. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105494. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
9
Truck drivers' behavior in encounters with vulnerable road users at intersections: Results from a test-track experiment.卡车司机在交叉口与弱势道路使用者相遇时的行为:测试轨道实验的结果。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106289. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106289. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
10
Interdependence of driver and pedestrian behavior in naturalistic roadway negotiations.自然主义道路通行中驾驶员与行人行为的相互依存关系。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(sup1):S62-S67. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2108023. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Empirical Validation of a Multidirectional Ultrasonic Pedestrian Detection System for Heavy-Duty Vehicles Under Adverse Weather Conditions.恶劣天气条件下重型车辆多向超声波行人检测系统的实证验证
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 25;25(17):5287. doi: 10.3390/s25175287.