• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应当如何修订 3“法则”及其原因?

How Should the 3 's Be Revised and Why?

机构信息

Postdoctoral fellow at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, Maryland.

Professor in the Department of Environmental Health and Engineering at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2024 Sep 1;26(9):E724-729. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2024.724.

DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2024.724
PMID:39250945
Abstract

The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique established what many know today as the "3 R's"-refinement, reduction, and replacement-when it was published in 1959. Since their formulation, these principles have guided decision-making for many about nonhuman animal subjects' uses in laboratory-based research. Discussion about how to amend or replace the 3 R's is ongoing, driven mainly by philosophical ethics approaches to nonhuman animal rights and by scientific advancement. This article explores merits and drawbacks of possible updates to and interpretations of the 3 R's.

摘要

《人道实验技术原则》于 1959 年出版,其中确立了许多人今天所熟知的“3R”原则——即优化、减少和替代——以用于非人类动物实验。自提出以来,这些原则一直为许多人在基于实验室的研究中使用非人类动物实验提供决策指导。关于如何修改或取代“3R”的讨论仍在继续,主要由非人类动物权利的哲学伦理方法和科学进步所驱动。本文探讨了“3R”原则的更新和解释的优点和缺点。

相似文献

1
How Should the 3 's Be Revised and Why?应当如何修订 3“法则”及其原因?
AMA J Ethics. 2024 Sep 1;26(9):E724-729. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2024.724.
2
With What Should We Replace Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Research Protocols?用什么来替代生物医学研究方案中的非人类动物?
AMA J Ethics. 2024 Sep 1;26(9):E701-708. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2024.701.
3
Does It Make Sense to Say Humans "Protect" Nonhuman Animals While Using Them to Promote Human Health Interests?说人类“保护”非人类动物,同时利用它们来促进人类健康利益,这有意义吗?
AMA J Ethics. 2024 Sep 1;26(9):E737-740. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2024.737.
4
Use of animals in experimental research: an ethical dilemma?动物在实验研究中的使用:一个伦理困境?
Gene Ther. 2004 Oct;11 Suppl 1:S64-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302371.
5
The utility of basic animal research.基础动物研究的效用。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2012 Nov-Dec;Suppl:S12-5. doi: 10.1002/hast.101.
6
Editorial: concepts of animal welfare.社论:动物福利的概念
Acta Biotheor. 2011 Jun;59(2):93-103. doi: 10.1007/s10441-011-9134-0. Epub 2011 May 6.
7
The moral status of invasive animal research.侵入性动物研究的道德地位。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2012 Nov-Dec;Suppl:S4-6. doi: 10.1002/hast.99.
8
Balancing animal welfare and assisted reproduction: ethics of preclinical animal research for testing new reproductive technologies.平衡动物福利与辅助生殖:用于测试新生殖技术的临床前动物研究的伦理问题
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Dec;21(4):537-545. doi: 10.1007/s11019-018-9827-0.
9
Vulnerable subjects? The case of nonhuman animals in experimentation.易受伤害的主体?实验中非人类动物的情况。
J Bioeth Inq. 2013 Dec;10(4):497-504. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9473-4. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
10
Should Nonhuman Animals Be Recognized Legally as Persons?非人类动物应否被法律承认为“人”?
AMA J Ethics. 2024 Sep 1;26(9):E696-700. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2024.696.

引用本文的文献

1
Bicomponent nano- and microfiber aerogels for effective management of junctional hemorrhage.用于有效处理交界性出血的双组分纳米和微纤维气凝胶
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 11;16(1):2403. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57836-0.