Yeh Kuan-Ting, Ho Valerie Wai-Yee, Chen Tai-Yu, Tu Junior Chun-Yu, Lin Hsiao-Yun, Chan Kai-Chieh
Department of Medical Education, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan, ROC.
Division of Head and Neck, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
J Chin Med Assoc. 2024 Dec 1;87(12):1090-1097. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001162. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
This study evaluated the long-term acoustic and subjective outcomes of Bonebridge bone conduction implant (BCI) 601 implantation in Taiwanese patients with microtia and aural atresia (AA).
A total of 41 microtia patients (28 males and 13 females; 26 with bilateral AA and 15 with unilateral AA) who received Bonebridge BCI 601 implantation between December 2014 and March 2021 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan, were included in this retrospective study. Acoustic outcomes assessed included functional hearing gain (FHG), speech reception threshold (SRT), and word recognition score (WRS), were assessed. Subjective outcomes were assessed using the Chinese versions of four questionnaires: the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB); the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale; the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids; and the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Living.
The mean age at the time of implantation was 18.9 years (range, 6.3-54.9), and the mean follow-up duration was 6.3 years (range, 2.8-9.1). The mean unaided air conduction pure tone average (PTA4) was 65.3 ± 8.8 decibels (dB) hearing level (HL) and the mean aided sound field PTA4 was 31.1 ± 9.1 dB HL, resulting in a FHG of 34.2 ± 11.7 dB HL ( p < 0.05). After Bonebridge implantation, improvements ( p < 0.05) in the mean SRT in quiet (from 58.3 ± 7.4 dB HL to 29.4 ± 7.0 dB HL), SRT in noise (from -1.4 ± 7.3 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to -9.6 ± 5.4 dB SNR), WRS in quiet (from 46.4 ± 26.9% to 93.8 ± 3.1%), and WRS in noise (from 46.7 ± 21.8% to 72.7 ± 19.3%) were found. Additionally, the bilateral AA group exhibited greater SRT and WRS improvements compared to the unilateral AA group ( p < 0.05). All mean subscale scores in the four questionnaires showed improvement after Bonebridge implantation, except for the mean aversiveness to sounds subscale score in the APHAB questionnaire.
Bonebridge BCI 601 implantation provided long-term acoustic and subjective benefits for patients with microtia and AA, particularly those with bilateral AA.
本研究评估了台湾小耳畸形和外耳道闭锁(AA)患者植入骨桥骨传导植入物(BCI)601后的长期声学和主观效果。
本回顾性研究纳入了2014年12月至2021年3月期间在台湾林口长庚纪念医院接受骨桥BCI 601植入的41例小耳畸形患者(28例男性和13例女性;26例双侧AA和15例单侧AA)。评估的声学结果包括功能性听力增益(FHG)、言语接受阈(SRT)和单词识别分数(WRS)。主观结果使用四份问卷的中文版进行评估:助听器效益简表(APHAB);言语、空间和听力质量量表;助听器国际结果量表;以及日常生活中对放大的满意度。
植入时的平均年龄为18.9岁(范围6.3 - 54.9岁),平均随访时间为6.3年(范围2.8 - 9.1年)。平均无助听气导纯音平均听阈(PTA4)为65.3±8.8分贝(dB)听力级(HL),平均助听听场PTA4为31.1±9.1 dB HL,功能性听力增益为34.2±11.7 dB HL(p < 0.05)。骨桥植入后,安静环境下的平均SRT(从58.3±7.4 dB HL改善至29.4±7.0 dB HL)、噪声环境下的SRT(从 - 1.4±7.3 dB信噪比(SNR)改善至 - 9.6±5.4 dB SNR)、安静环境下的WRS(从46.4±26.9%改善至93.8±3.1%)以及噪声环境下的WRS(从46.7±21.8%改善至72.7±19.3%)均有改善(p < 0.05)。此外,双侧AA组与单侧AA组相比,SRT和WRS改善更明显(p < 0.05)。除APHAB问卷中的声音厌恶感平均分量表分数外,四份问卷中的所有平均分量表分数在骨桥植入后均有改善。
骨桥BCI 601植入为小耳畸形和AA患者,尤其是双侧AA患者提供了长期的声学和主观益处。