Wille Kai, Dumke Marvin, Wilsdorf Nadine, Sadjadian Parvis, Schneider Artur, Jender-Bartling Stephanie, Kolatzki Vera, Horstmann Anette, Meixner Raphael, Jiménez-Muñoz Marina, Fuchs Christiane, Tischler Hans-Joachim, Griesshammer Martin
University Clinic for Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Palliative Care, Johannes Wesling Medical Center Minden, University of Bochum, Minden, Germany.
Core Facility Statistical Consulting, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Eur J Haematol. 2025 Jan;114(1):17-25. doi: 10.1111/ejh.14302. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
The prognosis of patients with refractory or relapsed AML (R/R-AML) is very limited. To (re)achieve complete remission, there has recently been increasing evidence that the combination of venetoclax (VEN) with chemotherapy is associated with improved outcomes.
Our retrospective, single-center study of 53 R/R-AML patients with a median follow-up time of 11.0 months compared standard salvage chemotherapy (FLAG-Ida or HAM in n = 35 patients) with a combination of venetoclax (VEN) and FLAG-Ida (FLAVIDA in n = 18 patients) concerning safety and efficacy.
Regarding the primary endpoints, there was a statistically significant increased event free survival (EFS) in the FLAVIDA group compared to patients with standard chemotherapy based on the univariate log-rank-test and in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (HR 0.22 [95% CI 0.05, 0.97]). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of patients developing febrile neutropenia CTCAE III° and IV° or a delay in hematological recovery. In addition, a clear trend towards an improved overall response rate (78% vs. 51%) was demonstrated in the FLAVIDA group.
The FLAVIDA regimen represents a promising treatment alternative for R/R AML patients with a high response rate and significantly improved EFS compared to standard chemotherapy.
难治性或复发性急性髓系白血病(R/R-AML)患者的预后非常有限。为了(再)实现完全缓解,最近越来越多的证据表明,维奈克拉(VEN)与化疗联合使用可改善预后。
我们对53例R/R-AML患者进行了回顾性单中心研究,中位随访时间为11.0个月,比较了标准挽救化疗(35例患者采用FLAG-Ida或HAM)与维奈克拉(VEN)和FLAG-Ida联合方案(18例患者采用FLAVIDA)的安全性和疗效。
关于主要终点,基于单变量对数秩检验和多变量Cox回归分析(HR 0.22 [95% CI 0.05, 0.97]),FLAVIDA组的无事件生存期(EFS)与标准化疗患者相比有统计学显著提高。两组在发生III°和IV°发热性中性粒细胞减少症的患者或血液学恢复延迟方面没有差异。此外,FLAVIDA组显示出总体缓解率提高的明显趋势(78%对51%)。
与标准化疗相比,FLAVIDA方案是R/R AML患者一种有前景的治疗选择,具有高缓解率和显著改善的EFS。