Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Sep;28(51):1-139. doi: 10.3310/KWDG6338.
We compared the relative benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy + cytoreductive surgery ± systemic chemotherapy versus cytoreductive surgery ± systemic chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy alone in people with peritoneal metastases from colorectal, gastric or ovarian cancers by a systematic review, meta-analysis and model-based cost-utility analysis.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and the Science Citation Index, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP trial registers until 14 April 2022. We included only randomised controlled trials addressing the research objectives. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool version 2 to assess the risk of bias in randomised controlled trials. We used the random-effects model for data synthesis when applicable. For the cost-effectiveness analysis, we performed a model-based cost-utility analysis using methods recommended by The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
The systematic review included a total of eight randomised controlled trials (seven randomised controlled trials, 955 participants included in the quantitative analysis). All comparisons other than those for stage III or greater epithelial ovarian cancer contained only one trial, indicating the paucity of randomised controlled trials that provided data. For colorectal cancer, hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy + cytoreductive surgery + systemic chemotherapy probably results in little to no difference in all-cause mortality (60.6% vs. 60.6%; hazard ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.58) and may increase the serious adverse event proportions compared to cytoreductive surgery ± systemic chemotherapy (25.6% vs. 15.2%; risk ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 2.77). Hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy + cytoreductive surgery + systemic chemotherapy probably decreases all-cause mortality compared to fluorouracil-based systemic chemotherapy alone (40.8% vs. 60.8%; hazard ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.95). For gastric cancer, there is high uncertainty about the effects of hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy + cytoreductive surgery + systemic chemotherapy versus cytoreductive surgery + systemic chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy alone on all-cause mortality. For stage III or greater epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy + cytoreductive surgery + systemic chemotherapy probably decreases all-cause mortality compared to cytoreductive surgery + systemic chemotherapy (46.3% vs. 57.4%; hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.93). Hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy + cytoreductive surgery + systemic chemotherapy may not be cost-effective versus cytoreductive surgery + systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer but may be cost-effective for the remaining comparisons.
We were unable to obtain individual participant data as planned. The limited number of randomised controlled trials for each comparison and the paucity of data on health-related quality of life mean that the recommendations may change as new evidence (from trials with a low risk of bias) emerges.
In people with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer with limited peritoneal metastases and who are likely to withstand major surgery, hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy + cytoreductive surgery + systemic chemotherapy should not be used in routine clinical practice (). There is considerable uncertainty as to whether hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy + cytoreductive surgery + systemic chemotherapy or cytoreductive surgery + systemic chemotherapy should be offered to patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastases . Hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy + cytoreductive surgery + systemic chemotherapy should be offered routinely to women with stage III or greater epithelial ovarian cancer and metastases confined to the abdomen requiring and likely to withstand interval cytoreductive surgery after chemotherapy ().
More randomised controlled trials are necessary.
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019130504.
This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 17/135/02) and is published in full in ; Vol. 28, No. 51. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
我们通过系统评价、荟萃分析和基于模型的成本效用分析,比较了高热腹腔内化疗联合细胞减灭术±全身化疗与细胞减灭术±全身化疗或全身化疗单独治疗结直肠、胃或卵巢癌腹膜转移患者的相对益处、危害和成本效益。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和科学引文索引、ClinicalTrials.gov 和世卫组织国际临床试验注册平台,检索时间截至 2022 年 4 月 14 日。我们仅纳入了针对研究目标的随机对照试验。我们使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具版本 2 评估了随机对照试验的偏倚风险。当适用时,我们使用随机效应模型进行数据综合。对于成本效用分析,我们使用英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所推荐的基于模型的成本效用分析方法。
系统评价共纳入了八项随机对照试验(七项随机对照试验,795 名参与者纳入定量分析)。除了 III 期或更高上皮性卵巢癌以外的所有比较,只有一项试验提供了数据,这表明提供数据的随机对照试验数量很少。对于结直肠癌,高热腹腔内化疗联合细胞减灭术+全身化疗+全身化疗可能与细胞减灭术±全身化疗相比,在全因死亡率方面没有差异(60.6% vs. 60.6%;风险比 1.00,95%置信区间 0.63 至 1.58),并且与细胞减灭术±全身化疗相比,可能增加严重不良事件的比例(25.6% vs. 15.2%;风险比 1.69,95%置信区间 1.03 至 2.77)。与氟尿嘧啶为基础的全身化疗相比,高热腹腔内化疗联合细胞减灭术+全身化疗可能降低全因死亡率(40.8% vs. 60.8%;风险比 0.55,95%置信区间 0.32 至 0.95)。对于胃癌,高热腹腔内化疗联合细胞减灭术+全身化疗与细胞减灭术+全身化疗或全身化疗单独治疗在全因死亡率方面的效果存在高度不确定性。对于接受间隔性细胞减灭术的 III 期或更高上皮性卵巢癌患者,与细胞减灭术+全身化疗相比,高热腹腔内化疗联合细胞减灭术+全身化疗可能降低全因死亡率(46.3% vs. 57.4%;风险比 0.73,95%置信区间 0.57 至 0.93)。与细胞减灭术+全身化疗相比,高热腹腔内化疗联合细胞减灭术+全身化疗可能对结直肠癌不太具有成本效益,但可能对其余的比较具有成本效益。
我们未能按计划获得个体参与者数据。每项比较的随机对照试验数量有限,并且关于健康相关生活质量的数据很少,这意味着随着新证据(来自低偏倚风险的试验)的出现,建议可能会发生变化。
对于腹膜转移有限且可能耐受大手术的结直肠癌患者,不应常规临床实践中应用高热腹腔内化疗联合细胞减灭术+全身化疗()。对于患有胃癌和腹膜转移的患者,高热腹腔内化疗联合细胞减灭术+全身化疗或细胞减灭术+全身化疗是否应被提供给患者存在很大的不确定性()。对于 III 期或更高上皮性卵巢癌且腹膜转移局限于腹部并需要且可能耐受化疗后间隔性细胞减灭术的女性,应常规提供高热腹腔内化疗联合细胞减灭术+全身化疗()。
需要更多的随机对照试验。
本研究已在 PROSPERO CRD42019130504 注册。
本研究由英国国家卫生与保健研究所卫生技术评估计划资助(英国国家卫生与保健研究所拨款文号:17/135/02),全文发表于;第 28 卷,第 51 期。欲了解更多有关拨款的信息,请访问英国国家卫生与保健研究所资助和奖项网站。