Department of General, Digestive and Metabolic Surgery, La Cavale Blanche University Hospital, Boulevard Tanguy Prigent, Brest, France; Univ Brest, CHU Brest, UMR 1304, Western Brittany Thrombosis Group, Brest, France.
Qualees, Paris, France.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 Dec;20(12):1270-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.08.019. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
The need for conversional metabolic and bariatric surgery (CMBS) is still growing. No large-scale prospective cohort studies have assessed changes in lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) after CMBS.
This study assesses and compares the effectiveness of the 4 main CMBS sequences after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB) on reimbursement and cost of LLT.
France.
This nationwide observational population-based cohort study analyzed data from the French National Health Insurance database. It included all patients who had undergone primary SG and AGB in France between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014, and followed until December 31, 2020. The study assessed LLT reimbursement evolution and costs across 4 different CMBS sequences.
During follow-up, 6396 patients underwent the 4 CMBS sequences: SG-RYGB (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) (n = 2400), AGB-SG (n = 2277), AGB-RYGB (n = 1173), and SG-SG (n = 546), with a rate of LLT reimbursement of 9.8%, 3.6%, 6.6%, and 7.9%, respectively, in the year before CMBS. The rates of discontinuation of treatment at 2 and 4 years were 41.9%, 35.4%, 45.6%, 20.5% and 45.6%, 31.3%, 64.3%, 31.6%, respectively. At 4 years, the median [interquartile range] annual costs (euros) per patient were significantly lower (P < .01) than the costs in the year before CMBS for each sequence: 86.8 [57.3; 136.1] versus 38.0 [.0; 64.6], 79.1 [50.5; 120.1] versus 50.4 [15.6; 64.1], 89.0 [66.5; 139.6] versus .0 [.0; 58.8], and 89.8 [66.1; 121.4] versus 63.1 [.0; 93.4].
Our study underlines the effectiveness of CMBS in significantly reducing the need and associated costs of LLT for patients with dyslipidemia over a 4-year period.
对转化代谢和减重手术(CMBS)的需求仍在不断增长。目前尚无大规模前瞻性队列研究评估 CMBS 后降脂治疗(LLT)的变化。
本研究评估并比较袖状胃切除术(SG)和可调胃束带术(AGB)后 4 种主要 CMBS 序列在 SG 和 AGB 后的报销和 LLT 费用方面的有效性。
法国。
本项全国性观察性基于人群的队列研究分析了法国国家健康保险数据库中的数据。纳入了 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间在法国接受过原发性 SG 和 AGB 的所有患者,并随访至 2020 年 12 月 31 日。研究评估了 4 种不同 CMBS 序列的 LLT 报销演变和成本。
在随访期间,6396 例患者接受了 4 种 CMBS 序列治疗:SG-RYGB(Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术)(n=2400)、AGB-SG(n=2277)、AGB-RYGB(n=1173)和 SG-SG(n=546),在 CMBS 前 1 年的 LLT 报销率分别为 9.8%、3.6%、6.6%和 7.9%。治疗在第 2 年和第 4 年的停药率分别为 41.9%、35.4%、45.6%、20.5%和 45.6%、31.3%、64.3%、31.6%。第 4 年,每位患者的年度中位(四分位距)费用(欧元)明显低于 CMBS 前 1 年的费用:86.8 [57.3;136.1] 比 38.0 [0.0;64.6],79.1 [50.5;120.1] 比 50.4 [15.6;64.1],89.0 [66.5;139.6] 比 0.0 [0.0;58.8],89.8 [66.1;121.4] 比 63.1 [0.0;93.4]。
我们的研究强调了 CMBS 在显著降低患有血脂异常的患者在 4 年内对 LLT 的需求和相关费用方面的有效性。