School of Exercise and Health, Yangpu District, Shanghai University of Sport, 399 Changhai Rd, Shanghai City, 200438, China.
Department of Military Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):2298. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19795-x.
Understanding the impact of environmental factors on physical activity (PA) and physical fitness (PF) is crucial for promoting a healthy lifestyle among children and adolescents. This study examines how awareness of sports policies, school, family, and community environments influence PA and PF in Chinese youth.
A cross-sectional study was conducted with 2747 children and adolescents (mean age 12.90 ± 2.49; 48.2% male) from 17 schools across five Chinese cities. Environmental factors were assessed via questionnaires, and PA levels were measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF). PF metrics, including BMI, waist-to-height ratio, grip strength, vertical jump, and 20-m shuttle run test (20-mSRT), were measured onsite. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to explore relationships between environmental factors and PA/PF outcomes.
The school environment scored highest (78.0 ± 9.5), while the community environment scored lowest (38.7 ± 18.0). Family environment positively influenced low-intensity PA (LPA) (β = 0.102, P < 0.001) but negatively affected moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) (β = -0.055, P = 0.035). Community environment and awareness of sports policies positively impacted MVPA (β = 0.216, P < 0.001; β = 0.072, P = 0.009, respectively). Family environment positively influenced BMI reduction (β = -0.103, P < 0.001) but negatively affected grip strength (β = -0.063, P = 0.018). Community environment improved grip strength and 20-mSRT performance (β = 0.088, P = 0.002; β = 0.065, P = 0.027).
School environments, despite high scores, do not significantly impact PA and PF. Community environments, though scoring lower, positively affect MVPA, grip strength, and 20-mSRT. Awareness of sports policies boosts MVPA, while family environments support LPA and BMI but are inversely related to MVPA and grip strength. Integrated strategies involving community infrastructure, family support, and policy awareness are essential for promoting active lifestyles among children and adolescents.
了解环境因素对儿童和青少年体力活动(PA)和身体状况(PF)的影响对于促进健康的生活方式至关重要。本研究旨在探讨中国青少年对体育政策、学校、家庭和社区环境的认识如何影响 PA 和 PF。
采用横断面研究,选取中国五个城市 17 所学校的 2747 名儿童和青少年(平均年龄 12.90±2.49 岁;48.2%为男性)。通过问卷调查评估环境因素,使用国际体力活动问卷-短表(IPAQ-SF)测量 PA 水平。现场测量 PF 指标,包括 BMI、腰高比、握力、垂直跳跃和 20 米穿梭跑测试(20-mSRT)。采用结构方程模型(SEM)探讨环境因素与 PA/PF 结果之间的关系。
学校环境得分最高(78.0±9.5),社区环境得分最低(38.7±18.0)。家庭环境正向影响低强度 PA(LPA)(β=0.102,P<0.001),但负向影响中高强度 PA(MVPA)(β=-0.055,P=0.035)。社区环境和体育政策意识正向影响 MVPA(β=0.216,P<0.001;β=0.072,P=0.009)。家庭环境正向影响 BMI 降低(β=-0.103,P<0.001),但负向影响握力(β=-0.063,P=0.018)。社区环境提高了握力和 20-mSRT 成绩(β=0.088,P=0.002;β=0.065,P=0.027)。
尽管学校环境得分较高,但对 PA 和 PF 没有显著影响。社区环境虽然得分较低,但正向影响 MVPA、握力和 20-mSRT。体育政策意识提高 MVPA,家庭环境支持 LPA 和 BMI,但与 MVPA 和握力呈负相关。社区基础设施、家庭支持和政策意识相结合的综合策略对于促进儿童和青少年的积极生活方式至关重要。