文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

干扰电疗法联合运动与假干扰电疗法联合运动治疗膝骨关节炎患者疼痛的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。

Efficacy of interferential current therapy plus exercise compared to sham interferential current plus exercise for pain relief in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2024 Dec;38(12):1622-1632. doi: 10.1177/02692155241278949. Epub 2024 Sep 10.


DOI:10.1177/02692155241278949
PMID:39257067
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of interferential current (IFC) therapy combined with quadriceps strengthening exercise versus sham IFC plus exercise for pain relief and functional improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis. STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation clinic. SUBJECTS: Knee osteoarthritis patients aged 50-85 years with a pain score ≥4/10. METHODS: One hundred forty-four participants were randomly allocated into the study and control groups. The study group received 20 min of IFC therapy (carrier frequency: 4000 Hz, beat frequency: 100 Hz) five times per week for three weeks, while the control group received sham IFC following the same protocol, followed by 10 min of exercise in both groups. Outcome measures included Numeric Rating Scale for Pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) score, gait speed, and EuroQol-Five Dimensions-Five Levels questionnaire assessed at baseline, Week 3, and Week 6. Adverse events and patient satisfaction were evaluated at Week 3. RESULTS: At Week 3, the study group demonstrated statistical improvement compared to the control group for Numeric Rating Scale for Pain, WOMAC Total, WOMAC Pain, and WOMAC Stiffness. The mean difference (95% confidence interval) between groups was 0.76 (0.21-1.30), 0.49 (0.03-0.95), 0.63 (0.13-1.13), and 0.62 (0.04-1.20), respectively. However, the mean differences between groups were below the Minimally Clinically Important Difference values for each outcome. Additionally, there were no significant differences between groups at Week 6 for any outcome measure. CONCLUSION: IFC had no effect on pain reduction and functional improvement in patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis.

摘要

目的:比较干扰电流(IFC)疗法联合股四头肌强化运动与假 IFC 加运动治疗膝骨关节炎患者疼痛缓解和功能改善的疗效。

研究设计:双盲随机对照试验。

设置:门诊康复诊所。

受试者:年龄在 50-85 岁之间,疼痛评分≥4/10 的膝骨关节炎患者。

方法:将 144 名参与者随机分配到研究组和对照组。研究组每周接受 5 次 20 分钟的 IFC 治疗(载波频率:4000 Hz,拍频:100 Hz),共 3 周,而对照组则按照相同的方案接受假 IFC 治疗,之后两组均进行 10 分钟的运动。在基线、第 3 周和第 6 周评估疼痛的数字评分量表、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学指数(WOMAC)评分、步态速度和欧洲五维健康量表问卷。在第 3 周评估不良事件和患者满意度。

结果:在第 3 周时,与对照组相比,研究组的疼痛数字评分量表、WOMAC 总分、WOMAC 疼痛和 WOMAC 僵硬均有统计学改善。组间平均差异(95%置信区间)分别为 0.76(0.21-1.30)、0.49(0.03-0.95)、0.63(0.13-1.13)和 0.62(0.04-1.20)。然而,对于每个结局,组间的平均差异均低于最小临床重要差异值。此外,在第 6 周时,对于任何结局指标,组间均无显著差异。

结论:IFC 对轻度至中度膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛缓解和功能改善没有影响。

相似文献

[1]
Efficacy of interferential current therapy plus exercise compared to sham interferential current plus exercise for pain relief in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomised controlled trial.

Clin Rehabil. 2024-12

[2]
Does the Combination of Platelet-rich Plasma and Supervised Exercise Yield Better Pain Relief and Enhanced Function in Knee Osteoarthritis? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024-6-1

[3]
Exercise program combined with electrophysical modalities in subjects with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020-4-20

[4]
Interferential current therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: comparison of the effectiveness of different amplitude-modulated frequencies.

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012-2

[5]
Comparison of the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, interferential currents, and shortwave diathermy in knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter study.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012-3-28

[6]
The effect of interferential current therapy on patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study.

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017-9-11

[7]
Effects of noninvasive interactive neurostimulation on symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, sham-controlled pilot study.

J Altern Complement Med. 2008-11

[8]
Efficacy of diadynamic currents as an adjunct to exercise to manage symptoms of knee osteoarthritis in adults: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Clin Rehabil. 2024-7

[9]
Is a Combination of Exercise and Dry Needling Effective for Knee OA?

Pain Med. 2020-2-1

[10]
Low-level laser therapy and interferential current in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Pain Manag. 2018-5

引用本文的文献

[1]
Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-12-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索