Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Clin Rehabil. 2024 Dec;38(12):1622-1632. doi: 10.1177/02692155241278949. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of interferential current (IFC) therapy combined with quadriceps strengthening exercise versus sham IFC plus exercise for pain relief and functional improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis. STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation clinic. SUBJECTS: Knee osteoarthritis patients aged 50-85 years with a pain score ≥4/10. METHODS: One hundred forty-four participants were randomly allocated into the study and control groups. The study group received 20 min of IFC therapy (carrier frequency: 4000 Hz, beat frequency: 100 Hz) five times per week for three weeks, while the control group received sham IFC following the same protocol, followed by 10 min of exercise in both groups. Outcome measures included Numeric Rating Scale for Pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) score, gait speed, and EuroQol-Five Dimensions-Five Levels questionnaire assessed at baseline, Week 3, and Week 6. Adverse events and patient satisfaction were evaluated at Week 3. RESULTS: At Week 3, the study group demonstrated statistical improvement compared to the control group for Numeric Rating Scale for Pain, WOMAC Total, WOMAC Pain, and WOMAC Stiffness. The mean difference (95% confidence interval) between groups was 0.76 (0.21-1.30), 0.49 (0.03-0.95), 0.63 (0.13-1.13), and 0.62 (0.04-1.20), respectively. However, the mean differences between groups were below the Minimally Clinically Important Difference values for each outcome. Additionally, there were no significant differences between groups at Week 6 for any outcome measure. CONCLUSION: IFC had no effect on pain reduction and functional improvement in patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis.
目的:比较干扰电流(IFC)疗法联合股四头肌强化运动与假 IFC 加运动治疗膝骨关节炎患者疼痛缓解和功能改善的疗效。
研究设计:双盲随机对照试验。
设置:门诊康复诊所。
受试者:年龄在 50-85 岁之间,疼痛评分≥4/10 的膝骨关节炎患者。
方法:将 144 名参与者随机分配到研究组和对照组。研究组每周接受 5 次 20 分钟的 IFC 治疗(载波频率:4000 Hz,拍频:100 Hz),共 3 周,而对照组则按照相同的方案接受假 IFC 治疗,之后两组均进行 10 分钟的运动。在基线、第 3 周和第 6 周评估疼痛的数字评分量表、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学指数(WOMAC)评分、步态速度和欧洲五维健康量表问卷。在第 3 周评估不良事件和患者满意度。
结果:在第 3 周时,与对照组相比,研究组的疼痛数字评分量表、WOMAC 总分、WOMAC 疼痛和 WOMAC 僵硬均有统计学改善。组间平均差异(95%置信区间)分别为 0.76(0.21-1.30)、0.49(0.03-0.95)、0.63(0.13-1.13)和 0.62(0.04-1.20)。然而,对于每个结局,组间的平均差异均低于最小临床重要差异值。此外,在第 6 周时,对于任何结局指标,组间均无显著差异。
结论:IFC 对轻度至中度膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛缓解和功能改善没有影响。
Pain Med. 2020-2-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-12-3