Czeczelewski Marcin, Kopyto Ewa, Kuczyńska Maryla, Drelich-Zbroja Anna, Jargiełło Tomasz
Department of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Students' Scientific Society at the Department of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Pol J Radiol. 2024 Aug 22;89:e414-e419. doi: 10.5114/pjr/190502. eCollection 2024.
The objective was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of microvascular flow imaging ultrasound (MVUS) for the detection of endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. A systematic search of the literature published until January 2024 was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines. The pooled rates of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of MVUS in endoleak detection with computed tomography angiography as the reference standard were estimated using univariate random-effect analysis with 95% confidence intervals. Three studies were considered eligible for inclusion. Superb micro-vascular imaging (SMI) was used as an MVUS technique in all cases. The total number of paired scans was 209. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual studies ranged 0.75-1.00 and 0.93-1.00, respectively. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of the SMI method was 0.91 (CI: 0.82-0.96) and 0.98 (CI: 0.94-1.00), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 635 (95% CI: 128-3140). The findings of the present study support the use of the MVUS for endoleak detection. However, further research is warranted to explore the broader application of MVUS, providing a more comprehensive understanding and establishing robust criteria for its role in clinical practice.
目的是评估微血管血流成像超声(MVUS)在检测腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后内漏方面的诊断准确性。根据诊断试验准确性的系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA-DTA)指南,对截至2024年1月发表的文献进行了系统检索。以计算机断层血管造影为参考标准,采用单变量随机效应分析估计MVUS检测内漏的敏感性、特异性和诊断比值比的合并率,并给出95%置信区间。三项研究被认为符合纳入标准。所有病例均采用超微血管成像(SMI)作为MVUS技术。配对扫描总数为209例。各研究的敏感性和特异性分别在0.75-1.00和0.93-1.00之间。SMI方法的合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.91(CI:0.82-0.96)和0.98(CI:0.94-1.00)。合并诊断比值比为635(95%CI:128-3140)。本研究结果支持使用MVUS检测内漏。然而,有必要进一步研究以探索MVUS更广泛的应用,以便更全面地理解并为其在临床实践中的作用建立可靠的标准。