Muhamad Nasir Nadzirah, Taib Haslina, Awang Nawi Mohamad Arif, Hassan Akram
School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, MYS.
Cureus. 2024 Aug 10;16(8):e66605. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66605. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Maintenance of dental implant with different hygiene methods or instruments may cause a surface alteration. It directly affects bacterial colonization and adhesion on titanium implant surfaces that result in peri-implant diseases. This study aimed to compare the adhesion on titanium implant abutments after instrumentation with a rubber cup with pumice and erbium, chromium-doped: yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser using scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation and colony-forming unit (CFU) measurement.
Twenty-one MegaGen titanium implant abutments were randomly distributed into three groups. Seven abutments were respectively selected for the control/untreated (C) group, while the other two groups were treated with rubber cups with pumice (P) and Er, Cr: YSGG laser (L). All samples were cultured with . for bacterial colonization and adhesion. One sample for each group was selected for SEM observation, while the other samples were prepared for CFU calculation.
For SEM results, at 2,000× magnification, machining marks were intact in the C group, roughened in the L group, and smoothened in the P group. At 5,000× and 10,000× magnifications, moderate colonies of were revealed in C and L groups, while sparse bacterial colonies were detected in the P group. However, for CFU results, statistical analysis showed no significant value (p>0.05) comparing all three groups.
P instrumentation revealed a lesser amount of adhesion in SEM photographs, but no statistical significance of CFU results was noted for all three groups.
使用不同的口腔卫生方法或器械维护牙种植体可能会导致表面改变。这直接影响细菌在钛种植体表面的定植和黏附,进而引发种植体周围疾病。本研究旨在通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察和菌落形成单位(CFU)测量,比较使用含浮石的橡胶杯和掺铒、铬的钇、钪、镓石榴石(Er, Cr: YSGG)激光器械处理后,钛种植体基台上细菌的黏附情况。
将21个美格真钛种植体基台随机分为三组。七 个基台分别入选对照组/未处理(C)组,另外两组分别用含浮石的橡胶杯(P)和Er, Cr: YSGG激光(L)进行处理。所有样本均接种 进行细菌定植和黏附培养。每组选取一个样本进行SEM观察,其他样本用于CFU计算。
SEM结果显示,在2000倍放大倍数下,C组的加工痕迹完整,L组变粗糙,P组变光滑。在5000倍和10000倍放大倍数下,C组和L组可见中等数量的 菌落,而P组检测到稀疏的细菌菌落。然而,CFU结果显示,三组之间的统计学分析无显著差异(p>0.05)。
P组器械处理在SEM照片中显示出较少的 黏附,但三组CFU结果无统计学意义。