Suppr超能文献

新一代药物洗脱支架置入后短期(1-3 个月)与标准(12 个月)双联抗血小板治疗的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Short-term (1-3 months) versus standard (12 months) dual antiplatelet therapy following new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 31;103(22):e38071. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038071.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention mainly receive antiplatelet therapy. However, limited data are available regarding the optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following the implantation of new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of short-term (1-3 months) DAPT and standard (12 months) DAPT after the implantation of a new-generation of DES.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library Database, Embase for trials that compared short-term (1-3 months) and standard DAPT after the implantation of next-generation DES were retrieved from all published studies in English until December 31, 2021. The primary endpoint was major bleeding. The secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and all bleeding.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 7 randomized controlled trials, comprising 28,344 subjects. Regarding primary endpoints, short-term DAPT exhibited a significantly lower incidence of major bleeding compared with standard DAPT [relative risk (RR): 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.54, 0.81), P < .0001]. For secondary endpoints, there were significant differences between short-term and standard DAPT in all bleeding [RR: 0.59, 95% CI: (0.50, 0.69), P < .00001]. However, no significant differences were identified in all-cause mortality [RR: 0.96, 95% CI: (0.77, 1.18), P = .27], myocardial infarction [RR: 0.98, 95% CI: (0.82, 1.18), P = .86], cardiac death [RR: 0.83, 95% CI: (0.63, 1.10), P = .20], stroke [RR: 1.08, 95% CI: (0.79, 1.47), P = .63], cerebrovascular [RR: 1.08, 95% CI: (0.79, 1.47), P = .63], and stent thrombosis [RR: 1.13, 95% CI: (0.80, 1.57), P = .49] between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing implantation of a new-generation of DES, short-term (1-3 months) DAPT exhibited no inferiority compared with standard (12 months) DAPT in terms of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and definite or probable stent thrombosis compared with standard (12 months) DAPT. However, short-term DAPT appeared superior to standard DAPT in terms of major bleeding and all bleeding.

摘要

背景

接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者主要接受抗血小板治疗。然而,关于新一代药物洗脱支架(DES)植入后最佳双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的数据有限。

目的

本研究旨在比较新一代 DES 植入后短期(1-3 个月)和标准(12 个月)DAPT 的临床结局。

方法

我们系统地检索了 PubMed、The Cochrane Library 数据库和 Embase,检索了截至 2021 年 12 月 31 日所有发表的英文研究中比较新一代 DES 植入后短期(1-3 个月)和标准 DAPT 的试验。主要终点是大出血。次要终点包括全因死亡率、心脏死亡、心肌梗死、卒中和支架血栓形成以及所有出血。

结果

本研究共纳入 7 项随机对照试验,共 28344 例患者。关于主要终点,短期 DAPT 与标准 DAPT 相比,大出血发生率显著降低[相对风险(RR):0.66,95%置信区间(CI):(0.54,0.81),P<0.0001]。对于次要终点,短期 DAPT 与标准 DAPT 相比,所有出血[RR:0.59,95%CI:(0.50,0.69),P<0.00001]有显著差异。然而,全因死亡率[RR:0.96,95%CI:(0.77,1.18),P=0.27]、心肌梗死[RR:0.98,95%CI:(0.82,1.18),P=0.86]、心脏死亡[RR:0.83,95%CI:(0.63,1.10),P=0.20]、卒[RR:1.08,95%CI:(0.79,1.47),P=0.63]、脑血管[RR:1.08,95%CI:(0.79,1.47),P=0.63]和支架血栓形成[RR:1.13,95%CI:(0.80,1.57),P=0.49]两组间无统计学差异。

结论

在新一代 DES 植入的患者中,与标准(12 个月)DAPT 相比,短期(1-3 个月)DAPT 在全因死亡率、心脏死亡、心肌梗死、卒中和明确或可能的支架血栓形成方面并不劣于标准(12 个月)DAPT。然而,与标准 DAPT 相比,短期 DAPT 在大出血和所有出血方面更具优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ddd/11142824/b6d62fdfef8f/medi-103-e38071-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验