• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险较大的首例人体临床试验在体质脆弱人群中开展:承担道德成本。

Risky first-in-human clinical trials on medically fragile persons: owning the moral cost.

机构信息

College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI, USA.

出版信息

Theor Med Bioeth. 2024 Dec;45(6):447-459. doi: 10.1007/s11017-024-09682-2. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1007/s11017-024-09682-2
PMID:39259366
Abstract

The purpose of a first-in-human (FIH) clinical trial is to gather information about how the drug or device affects and interacts with the human body: its safety, side effects, and (potential) dosage. As such, the primary goal of a FIH trial is not participant benefit but to gain knowledge of drug or device efficacy, i.e., baseline human safety knowledge. Some FIH clinical trials carry significant foreseeable risk to participants with little to no foreseeable participant benefit. Participation in such trials would be a bad deal for participants, and the research is considered justifiable because of the promise of significant potential social benefit. I argue that there is an ethical tension inherent in risky FIH research and that researchers should fairly compensate risky FIH trial participants. This does not make the risk-benefit outcome more favorable for participants; rather, it amounts to a collective reckoning with the ethical tension inherent in the research.

摘要

首次人体临床试验(FIH)的目的是收集有关药物或器械如何影响和与人体相互作用的信息:其安全性、副作用和(潜在)剂量。因此,FIH 试验的主要目标不是参与者的利益,而是获得药物或器械疗效的知识,即基本的人体安全知识。一些 FIH 临床试验对参与者具有重大可预见风险,几乎没有可预见的参与者受益。对于参与者来说,参与此类试验将是一个糟糕的选择,而且由于具有重大潜在社会效益的承诺,研究被认为是合理的。我认为,风险 FIH 研究中存在内在的伦理紧张关系,研究人员应该公平地补偿风险 FIH 试验参与者。这并没有使风险效益结果对参与者更加有利;相反,这相当于对研究中内在的伦理紧张关系进行集体清算。

相似文献

1
Risky first-in-human clinical trials on medically fragile persons: owning the moral cost.风险较大的首例人体临床试验在体质脆弱人群中开展:承担道德成本。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2024 Dec;45(6):447-459. doi: 10.1007/s11017-024-09682-2. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
2
Compensating clinical trial participants from limited resource settings in internationally sponsored clinical trials: a proposal.在国际资助的临床试验中补偿来自资源有限地区的临床试验参与者:一项提议。
Malawi Med J. 2008 Jun;20(2):42-5. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v20i2.10955.
3
Does the Law on Compensation for Research-Related Injury in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand Meet Ethical Requirements?
Med Law Rev. 2017 Aug 1;25(3):397-427. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwx019.
4
In need of remedy: US policy for compensating injured research participants.亟待补救:美国赔偿受伤研究参与者的政策。
J Med Ethics. 2014 Mar;40(3):182-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100771. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
5
First-in-human trial participants: not a vulnerable population, but vulnerable nonetheless.首例人体试验参与者:并非弱势群体,但仍易受伤害。
J Law Med Ethics. 2009 Spring;37(1):38-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00349.x.
6
New regulations on compensation for injury and death in drug trials.药物试验中伤亡赔偿新规定。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2013 Apr-Jun;10(2):76-9. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2013.026.
7
Compensation for subjects of medical research: the moral rights of patients and the power of research ethics committees.医学研究受试者的补偿:患者的道德权利与研究伦理委员会的权力
J Med Ethics. 1997 Jun;23(3):181-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.3.181.
8
The unique status of first-in-human studies: strengthening the social value requirement.首次人体研究的独特地位:强化社会价值要求。
Drug Discov Today. 2017 Feb;22(2):471-475. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
9
Compensation for research injuries.研究损伤的赔偿。
IRB. 2005 May-Jun;27(3):11-5.
10
Serial Participation and the Ethics of Phase 1 Healthy Volunteer Research.连续参与与1期健康志愿者研究的伦理
J Med Philos. 2018 Jan 12;43(1):83-114. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhx033.

引用本文的文献

1
Who should be included in first-in-human trials? A systematic review of reasons.首次人体试验应纳入哪些人?原因的系统评价。
J Transl Med. 2025 Jun 11;23(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06550-y.
2
Ethical Analysis of Voluntariness in Pig Kidney Xenotransplant First-in-Human Clinical Trials.猪肾异种移植首次人体临床试验中自愿性的伦理分析
Xenotransplantation. 2025 May-Jun;32(3):e70052. doi: 10.1111/xen.70052.