Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park.
Department of Special Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Oct 8;67(10):3803-3825. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00212. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
Language sample analysis (LSA) is a commonly recommended method of assessment for bilingual children. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the literature on the use of LSA to differentiate between developmental language disorder (DLD) and typical language (TL) in bilingual children.
We conducted a search of several large electronic databases along with forward and backward searches and applied abstract and full-text screening procedures to identify all relevant studies. We then estimated standardized mean differences, representing the ability of LSA to differentiate between DLD and TL, using multilevel model and subgroup and moderator analyses to identify characteristics of LSA that may be associated with differences in effect size magnitude. We conducted assessments of publication bias and risk of bias by examining quality indicators for each study.
The search yielded 35 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Participants ranged in age from 2;0 (years;months) to 11;9, with over 40 languages represented. Across studies, the pooled standardized mean difference indicated that children with DLD performed 0.78 lower on LSA measures than those with TL. Measures of morphosyntactic accuracy exhibited the largest pooled effect size. Elicitation method, language of task, and age were not associated with differences in effect size.
Results of this study provide evidence of the clinical utility of LSA in differentiating between DLD and TL in bilingual children. Further research is needed to examine classification accuracy as well as task characteristics that may improve its diagnostic utility.
语言样本分析(LSA)是一种常用于评估双语儿童的方法。本系统综述和荟萃分析全面概述了使用 LSA 区分双语儿童的发育性语言障碍(DLD)和典型语言(TL)的文献。
我们对几个大型电子数据库进行了搜索,并进行了向前和向后搜索,并应用了摘要和全文筛选程序来识别所有相关研究。然后,我们使用多层次模型和子组和调节因素分析来估计标准化均数差异,代表 LSA 区分 DLD 和 TL 的能力,以确定可能与效应大小差异相关的 LSA 特征。我们通过检查每项研究的质量指标来评估发表偏倚和偏倚风险。
搜索共产生了 35 篇符合纳入标准的文章。参与者的年龄从 2;0(岁;月)到 11;9 岁不等,涉及 40 多种语言。在各项研究中,汇总的标准化均数差异表明,患有 DLD 的儿童在 LSA 测量中的表现比 TL 儿童低 0.78。形态句法准确性的测量显示出最大的汇总效应量。启发方法、任务语言和年龄与效应大小差异无关。
本研究结果提供了 LSA 在区分双语儿童的 DLD 和 TL 方面具有临床实用性的证据。需要进一步研究来检查分类准确性以及可能提高其诊断效用的任务特征。