• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语言样本分析在双语儿童中对发育性语言障碍与典型语言的区分作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Use of Language Sample Analysis to Differentiate Developmental Language Disorder From Typical Language in Bilingual Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park.

Department of Special Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Oct 8;67(10):3803-3825. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00212. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00212
PMID:39259882
Abstract

PURPOSE

Language sample analysis (LSA) is a commonly recommended method of assessment for bilingual children. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the literature on the use of LSA to differentiate between developmental language disorder (DLD) and typical language (TL) in bilingual children.

METHOD

We conducted a search of several large electronic databases along with forward and backward searches and applied abstract and full-text screening procedures to identify all relevant studies. We then estimated standardized mean differences, representing the ability of LSA to differentiate between DLD and TL, using multilevel model and subgroup and moderator analyses to identify characteristics of LSA that may be associated with differences in effect size magnitude. We conducted assessments of publication bias and risk of bias by examining quality indicators for each study.

RESULTS

The search yielded 35 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Participants ranged in age from 2;0 (years;months) to 11;9, with over 40 languages represented. Across studies, the pooled standardized mean difference indicated that children with DLD performed 0.78 lower on LSA measures than those with TL. Measures of morphosyntactic accuracy exhibited the largest pooled effect size. Elicitation method, language of task, and age were not associated with differences in effect size.

DISCUSSION

Results of this study provide evidence of the clinical utility of LSA in differentiating between DLD and TL in bilingual children. Further research is needed to examine classification accuracy as well as task characteristics that may improve its diagnostic utility.

摘要

目的

语言样本分析(LSA)是一种常用于评估双语儿童的方法。本系统综述和荟萃分析全面概述了使用 LSA 区分双语儿童的发育性语言障碍(DLD)和典型语言(TL)的文献。

方法

我们对几个大型电子数据库进行了搜索,并进行了向前和向后搜索,并应用了摘要和全文筛选程序来识别所有相关研究。然后,我们使用多层次模型和子组和调节因素分析来估计标准化均数差异,代表 LSA 区分 DLD 和 TL 的能力,以确定可能与效应大小差异相关的 LSA 特征。我们通过检查每项研究的质量指标来评估发表偏倚和偏倚风险。

结果

搜索共产生了 35 篇符合纳入标准的文章。参与者的年龄从 2;0(岁;月)到 11;9 岁不等,涉及 40 多种语言。在各项研究中,汇总的标准化均数差异表明,患有 DLD 的儿童在 LSA 测量中的表现比 TL 儿童低 0.78。形态句法准确性的测量显示出最大的汇总效应量。启发方法、任务语言和年龄与效应大小差异无关。

讨论

本研究结果提供了 LSA 在区分双语儿童的 DLD 和 TL 方面具有临床实用性的证据。需要进一步研究来检查分类准确性以及可能提高其诊断效用的任务特征。

相似文献

1
The Use of Language Sample Analysis to Differentiate Developmental Language Disorder From Typical Language in Bilingual Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.语言样本分析在双语儿童中对发育性语言障碍与典型语言的区分作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Oct 8;67(10):3803-3825. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00212. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Spanish Bilingual Morphosyntactic Development in Bilingual Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder: Articles, Clitics, Verbs, and the Subjunctive Mood.西班牙语双语儿童语言发育障碍与非语言发育障碍者的形态句法发展:冠词、小品词、动词和虚拟语气。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Dec 11;66(12):4678-4698. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00091. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
4
Code-Switching During Narratives by Bilingual Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.双语儿童与发展性语言障碍儿童叙事中的语码转换。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2023 Jul 5;54(3):996-1019. doi: 10.1044/2023_LSHSS-22-00149. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
5
Using Nonword Repetition to Identify Language Impairment in Bilingual Children: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.使用无词复述来识别双语儿童的语言障碍:诊断准确性的元分析。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Sep 23;30(5):2275-2295. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00237. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
6
L2 vocabulary acquisition of early sequentially bilingual children with TD and DLD affected differently by exposure and age of onset.患有典型发育(TD)和发育性语言障碍(DLD)的早期顺序双语儿童的L2词汇习得受接触情况和发病年龄的影响不同。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Jan;56(1):72-89. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12583. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
7
The Reliability of Short Conversational Language Sample Measures in Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.有和没有发育性语言障碍的儿童的简短会话语言样本测量的可靠性。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 May 11;65(5):1939-1955. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00628. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
8
Diagnostic Accuracy of Grammaticality and Utterance Length in Bilingual Children.双语儿童语法性和话语长度的诊断准确性。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2024 Apr 11;55(2):577-597. doi: 10.1044/2024_LSHSS-23-00100. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
9
Using Nonword Repetition to Identify Developmental Language Disorder in Monolingual and Bilingual Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.使用非词重复测试识别单语和双语儿童的发育性语言障碍:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Sep 14;64(9):3578-3593. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00552. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
10
Language intervention in bilingual children with developmental language disorder: A systematic review.发育性语言障碍双语儿童的语言干预:系统评价。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Mar;58(2):576-600. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12803. Epub 2022 Nov 25.