Suppr超能文献

视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病研究中异质性复发和疗效终点定义:系统评价。

Heterogenous relapse and efficacy endpoint definitions for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder studies: A systematic review.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas, R. Afonso Pena, 1053, Manaus, AM, 69020-160, Brazil.

School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences of Minas Gerais, Alameda Ezequiel Dias, 275, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130-110, Brazil.

出版信息

Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024 Nov;91:105868. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105868. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the last years, multiple studies have been dedicated to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment options for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD). However, there is a wide variety of endpoints employed across these studies. Our goal is to conduct a systematic review describing the endpoints utilized in studies related to NMOSD.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception to May 2023, to identify studies analyzing treatment options in patients with NMOSD. We collected data on baseline study characteristics and all efficacy outcomes available.

RESULTS

We included 127 studies and identified approximately 40 different efficacy endpoints, categorized into 1) relapse, 2) disability, 3) visual acuity, and 4) surrogate outcomes. Most studies were retrospective (54.3 %) and aimed at attack prevention (81.4 %). The most common relapse-related outcomes were annualized relapse rate (73.2 %), followed by relapse rate (50.4 %), and relapse-free rate (36.2 %). The relapse definition also varied widely among studies, with only 73 (57.4 %) studies explicitly addressing the definition used. The most common disability outcome was the Expanded Disability Scale (97.6 %), followed by the Modified Rankin Scale (7.9 %). Visual Acuity Score was employed in 14.2 % of studies, followed by Visual Evoked Potentials (6.3 %). Imaging was the most common surrogate (20.5 %), followed by the fraction of B cells (18.1 %).

CONCLUSION

Publications were heterogeneous in measuring efficacy, with different use of endpoints and relapse definitions. Standardization across studies would improve data analysis and application in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

近年来,多项研究致力于评估不同治疗方案治疗视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病(NMOSD)的疗效。然而,这些研究中使用的终点指标种类繁多。我们的目标是进行一项系统综述,描述与 NMOSD 相关研究中使用的终点指标。

方法

从建库至 2023 年 5 月,我们检索了 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库,以确定分析 NMOSD 患者治疗选择的研究。我们收集了基线研究特征和所有可用疗效结果的数据。

结果

我们纳入了 127 项研究,确定了大约 40 种不同的疗效终点指标,分为 1)复发、2)残疾、3)视力和 4)替代终点。大多数研究为回顾性(54.3%),旨在预防发作(81.4%)。最常见的与复发相关的结果是年复发率(73.2%),其次是复发率(50.4%)和无复发率(36.2%)。研究之间的复发定义也存在很大差异,只有 73 项(57.4%)研究明确了所使用的定义。最常见的残疾结局是扩展残疾量表(97.6%),其次是改良 Rankin 量表(7.9%)。视力评分在 14.2%的研究中使用,其次是视觉诱发电位(6.3%)。影像学是最常见的替代指标(20.5%),其次是 B 细胞分数(18.1%)。

结论

在衡量疗效方面,出版物存在很大的异质性,终点指标和复发定义的使用也不同。跨研究的标准化将提高数据分析和在临床实践中的应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验