• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实践指南和专家共识声明:COVID-19 患者康复治疗的系统评价。

Clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements on rehabilitation for patients with COVID-19: a systematic review.

机构信息

School of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 10;14(9):e086301. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086301.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086301
PMID:39260851
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11409320/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To appraise the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and expert consensus statements on rehabilitation for patients with COVID-19, summarise recommendations of rehabilitation assessments and interventions and evaluate the heterogeneity of the recommendations.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Embase databases and five online guideline repositories: The National Guideline Clearinghouse, Guidelines International Network, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and WHO were searched from their inception to August 2024. In addition, we reviewed reference lists of eligible citations and searched the grey literature on the relevant websites.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

We included CPGs and expert consensus statements which provided information about rehabilitation of patients with COVID-19. To be eligible, the CPGs and expert consensus statements were issued in English by a nationally or internationally recognised government authority, medical/academic society or organisation. If there were multiple versions of the guidelines, we included the latest one. The translations, interpretations and abstracts of guidelines were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

All recommendations on rehabilitation assessments and interventions for COVID-19 were extracted and summarised. Two reviewers independently evaluated the methodological quality with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, and two other reviewers assessed the reporting quality using the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) statement of included CPGs and expert consensus statements. We used the Measurement Scale of Rate of Agreement to evaluate the heterogeneity of the recommendations in different CPGs and expert consensus statements.

RESULTS

A total of 31 CPGs and expert consensus statements were included. 14 guidelines provided recommendations for rehabilitation assessments. At the early, development, critical and recovery stages of COVID-19, the most frequently recommended were exercise therapy (25.8%, 35.5%, 25.8% and 58.1%, respectively). According to AGREE II, 17 included guidelines were assessed as low methodological quality (35%-56%), 10 guidelines were rated as moderate quality (46%- 62%) and four had high quality (69%-79%). Among 31 eligible guidelines, the reporting rate of 22 items in the RIGHT checklist ranged from 10% to 100%. The included guidelines were consistent with the reference guidelines (80%-100%). Only one guideline existed minor (60%-80%) disagreements in respiratory muscle training relative to the reference guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

Rehabilitation assessments and interventions should be implemented consistently throughout the entire process of COVID-19. The recommendations should be tailored to each stage of COVID-19. The methodological and reporting qualities of several guidelines remain suboptimal. Therefore, developers should adhere strictly to the AGREE II standard and RIGHT checklist to formulate and publish CPGs and expert consensus statements with high quality.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020190761.

摘要

目的

评价针对 COVID-19 患者康复的临床实践指南(CPG)和专家共识声明的质量,总结康复评估和干预措施的建议,并评估建议的异质性。

设计

系统评价。

数据来源

从建库至 2024 年 8 月,我们检索了 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库以及五个在线指南库:国家指南清除库、国际指南网络、苏格兰校际指南网络、国家卫生和临床卓越研究所和世界卫生组织。此外,我们还查阅了合格引文的参考文献列表,并在相关网站上搜索了灰色文献。

选择研究的标准

我们纳入了提供 COVID-19 患者康复信息的 CPG 和专家共识声明。为了符合条件,CPG 和专家共识声明必须由具有国家或国际认可度的政府机构、医疗/学术协会或组织以英文发布。如果有多个版本的指南,我们将纳入最新的版本。指南的翻译、解释和摘要被排除在外。

数据提取和综合

我们提取并总结了所有关于 COVID-19 康复评估和干预措施的建议。两名审查员独立使用评估研究和评估指南的适用性 (AGREE) II 工具评估方法学质量,另外两名审查员使用医疗保健实践指南报告项目 (RIGHT) 声明评估纳入的 CPG 和专家共识声明的报告质量。我们使用协议一致性度量尺来评估不同 CPG 和专家共识声明中建议的异质性。

结果

共纳入 31 项 CPG 和专家共识声明。14 项指南提供了康复评估的建议。在 COVID-19 的早期、发展、关键和康复阶段,最常推荐的是运动疗法(分别为 25.8%、35.5%、25.8%和 58.1%)。根据 AGREE II,17 项纳入的指南被评估为低方法学质量(35%-56%),10 项被评为中度质量(46%-62%),4 项具有高质量(69%-79%)。在 31 项合格指南中,RIGHT 清单中的 22 项报告率在 10%到 100%之间。纳入的指南与参考指南一致(80%-100%)。只有一项指南在呼吸肌训练方面与参考指南存在轻微(60%-80%)分歧。

结论

康复评估和干预措施应在 COVID-19 整个过程中持续实施。建议应根据 COVID-19 的每个阶段进行调整。一些指南的方法学和报告质量仍然不尽如人意。因此,制定者应严格遵守 AGREE II 标准和 RIGHT 清单,制定和发布高质量的 CPG 和专家共识声明。

前瞻性注册号

CRD42020190761。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5cf/11409320/ee193a19ebcc/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5cf/11409320/ee193a19ebcc/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5cf/11409320/ee193a19ebcc/bmjopen-14-9-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements on rehabilitation for patients with COVID-19: a systematic review.临床实践指南和专家共识声明:COVID-19 患者康复治疗的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 10;14(9):e086301. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086301.
2
Clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements on rehabilitation for patients with COVID-19: protocol for a systematic review.临床实践指南和专家共识声明关于 COVID-19 患者康复:系统评价的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e060767. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060767.
3
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines addressing massage interventions using the AGREE II instrument.按摩干预措施临床实践指南的 AGREE II 工具质量评价。
Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 8;13(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02503-6.
4
Clinical practice guidelines and experts' consensuses of traditional Chinese herbal medicine for novel coronavirus (COVID-19): protocol of a systematic review.临床实践指南和传统中药专家共识治疗新型冠状病毒(COVID-19):系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 3;9(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01432-4.
5
Analysis of COVID-19 Guideline Quality and Change of Recommendations: A Systematic Review.《2019冠状病毒病指南质量及推荐意见变化分析:一项系统评价》
Health Data Sci. 2021 Jul 22;2021:9806173. doi: 10.34133/2021/9806173. eCollection 2021.
6
Evaluation of guidelines regarding surgical treatment of breast cancer using the AGREE Instrument: a systematic review.使用AGREE工具对乳腺癌手术治疗指南的评估:一项系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 14;7(11):e014883. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014883.
7
A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements for Cardiac Rehabilitation Delivery: Consensus, Divergence, and Important Knowledge Gaps.心脏康复实施的临床实践指南与共识声明的系统评价:共识、分歧及重要知识空白
Can J Cardiol. 2024 Mar;40(3):330-346. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.10.016. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
8
Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for the management of COVID-19: protocol for a systematic review.对 COVID-19 管理临床实践指南的批判性评估:系统评价议定书。
Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 22;10(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01871-7.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
A Systematic Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of Children With Moderate or Severe Acquired Brain Injury.基于循证的临床实践指南对中度或重度获得性脑损伤儿童康复的系统批判性评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Apr;100(4):711-723. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.031. Epub 2018 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Functional outcome after interdisciplinary, acute rehabilitation in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study.COVID-19 患者接受跨学科、急性期康复治疗后的功能预后:一项回顾性研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Dec;274(8):1993-2001. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01862-4. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
Two- and 3-year outcomes in convalescent individuals with COVID-19: A prospective cohort study.COVID-19 康復者的 2 年和 3 年結果:一項前瞻性隊列研究。
J Med Virol. 2024 Apr;96(4):e29566. doi: 10.1002/jmv.29566.
3
Clinical effectiveness of an online supervised group physical and mental health rehabilitation programme for adults with post-covid-19 condition (REGAIN study): multicentre randomised controlled trial.
新冠后成人在线监督团体身心康复项目的临床效果(REGAIN 研究):多中心随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2024 Feb 7;384:e076506. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076506.
4
Cognitive dysfunction after covid-19.新冠病毒感染后认知功能障碍
BMJ. 2024 Feb 1;384:e075387. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075387.
5
Evidence-based position paper on physical and rehabilitation medicine professional practice for persons with COVID-19, including post COVID-19 condition: the European PRM position (UEMS PRM Section).基于证据的关于 COVID-19 患者的物理医学与康复医学专业实践的立场文件,包括新冠后状况:欧洲物理医学与康复医学学会(UEMS PRM 分会)的立场。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Dec;59(6):789-799. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08315-6.
6
Rehabilitation Interventions for Physical Capacity and Quality of Life in Adults With Post-COVID-19 Condition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新冠后成年人身体能力和生活质量的康复干预:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2333838. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.33838.
7
Efficacy of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新冠肺炎康复后的肺康复疗效:系统评价与荟萃分析
Biomedicines. 2023 Aug 7;11(8):2213. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082213.
8
Forming a consensus opinion to inform long COVID support mechanisms and interventions: a modified Delphi approach.形成共识意见以指导长期新冠支持机制和干预措施:一种改良的德尔菲法。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Aug 9;62:102145. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102145. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study.新冠肺炎患者出院后 6 个月的后果:一项队列研究。
Lancet. 2023 Jun 17;401(10393):e21-e33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00810-3. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
10
S2k-Guideline SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 and (early) rehabilitation - a consensus-based guideline for Germany.S2k指南:新型冠状病毒、2019冠状病毒病与(早期)康复——德国基于共识的指南
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2023 May 12;18:Doc12. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000438. eCollection 2023.